: "iot-director...@ietf.org" , "alto@ietf.org"
> , "last-c...@ietf.org" ,
> "draft-ietf-alto-new-transport....@ietf.org"
>
> Subject: Re: [alto] Iotdir telechat review of draft-ietf-alto-new-transport-17
>
> Hi Med and Wesley,
>
> Th
To: "Wesley Eddy" , "iot-director...@ietf.org"
>
> Cc: "alto@ietf.org" ,
> "draft-ietf-alto-new-transport....@ietf.org"
> , "last-c...@ietf.org"
>
> Subject: RE: [alto] Iotdir telechat review of draft-ietf-alto-new-transport-17
&g
org
> Cc : alto@ietf.org; draft-ietf-alto-new-transport@ietf.org; last-
> c...@ietf.org
> Objet : [alto] Iotdir telechat review of draft-ietf-alto-new-
> transport-17
>
> Reviewer: Wesley Eddy
> Review result: Ready with Issues
>
> I only found 1 real "issue"
Reviewer: Wesley Eddy
Review result: Ready with Issues
I only found 1 real "issue" in reading this document, and a few smaller nits,
described below. None of these comments are specifically related to IoTDIR
type of concerns, and it doesn't seem like the protocol would be intended for
use in
