On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 08:15:05AM +0100, Dietmar Goldbeck wrote:
On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 08:04:49PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
~$ amadmin DailySet1 find localhost
Scanning /data/backup...
date host disk lv tape or file file status
2003-02-17 localhost
Hello
I added the /usr/local/sbin to the Path variable of user amanda. I can
successfully execute the amanda commands.
I ran amdump without running amlabel. I want to label the tape now-
Running the command gives the following error
[amanda@backup admin]$ amlabel -f DailySet1 DailySet10
I ran Tapetype on my Ultrium drive (came with a Dell Poweredge server),
and got this:
define tapetype Ultrium {
comment Ultrium
length 101632 mbytes
filemark 0 kbytes
speed 13884 kbytes
}
If I remember right, it took about an hour to run if I gave it the right
parameters. I
Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
On Mon, 17 Feb 2003 at 11:27pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
I am using an Exabyte Eliant 820 tape drive on Linux kernel 2.4.18 and
would like to make sure the hardware compression is disabled. Does anyone
know how I can check that ?
For that drive, compression is
--
Someone (possibly you) has requested that your email address be added
to or deleted from the mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED].
If you really want this action to be taken, please send the following
commands (exactly as shown) back to [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
auth e7c6df57 subscribe
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 10:27:44AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have indeed a tapecycle 4 configuration
Is there a way to make sevral backup a day but still have the same
behaviour as if those backups were made one per day? (without playing
wit the date of the computer)
You can run
On Mon, 17 Feb 2003 at 6:50pm, Qian Chen wrote
1. crontab entray like 45 0 * * 2-6/usr/sbin/amdump DailySet1 to
start the amanda server. server reads /etc/amanda/DailySet1/disklist to
find which client/dir needs backup?
Yep, and reads amanda.conf for all the other config parameters.
2.
Jean-Louis Martineau [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 10:40:22AM +0100, Sven Rudolph wrote:
With Amanda 2.4.2 the exclude files didn't need to be readable by the
amanda user. The exclude files are only used by tar which runs as
root anyway.
In 2.4.3 the exclude files
Dave Ewall wrote:
I ran Tapetype on my Ultrium drive (came with a Dell Poweredge server),
and got this:
define tapetype Ultrium {
comment Ultrium
length 101632 mbytes
filemark 0 kbytes
speed 13884 kbytes
}
If I remember right, it took about an hour to run if I gave it the right
It should take about:
2 passes * (101632 * 1024 kbytes / 13884 kbytes/sec) /pass
= 14990 sec
or about4 hours 10 min.
+ some time to rewind and stop/start at filemarks.
The stop/start at filemarks is what makes it slower than expected. The
more files it has to
On Tuesday 18 February 2003 05:44 am, Paul Bijnens wrote:
Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
On Mon, 17 Feb 2003 at 11:27pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
I am using an Exabyte Eliant 820 tape drive on Linux kernel
2.4.18 and would like to make sure the hardware compression is
disabled. Does anyone know how
Has anyone else already on the list gotten the message that Someone
(possibly you) has requested that your email address be added?
It is dated today.
I have.
/ Lars Segerlund.
Potts, Ross A. wrote:
Has anyone else already on the list gotten the message that Someone
(possibly you) has requested that your email address be added?
It is dated today.
--On Tuesday, February 18, 2003 06:58:18 -0800 Potts, Ross A. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anyone else already on the list gotten the message that Someone
(possibly you) has requested that your email address be added?
It is dated today.
Yes, someone evidently tried to subscribe the list to
Under Linux you can call the following to disable compression.
mt -f /dev/st0 nocompression
The other method would be the disable a DIP switch or jumper on the
tape drive.
I include the above line in my startup scripts. It would appear it
only needs to be set at boot.
Russell
On Mon,
It looks like someone tried to register [EMAIL PROTECTED] as a member of
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Not a pretty concept... :-)
Unless someone replies to it and verifies the addition we should be fine.
Hopefully the moderator/administrator caught it and cancelled it...
X-Authentication-Warning:
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 06:58:18AM -0800, Potts, Ross A. enlightened us:
Has anyone else already on the list gotten the message that Someone
(possibly you) has requested that your email address be added?
It is dated today.
Yeah, it looks like someone tried to subscribe the list to itself...
yes, some burb in the listserver I guess.
cheers
Axel
On Tue, 2003-02-18 at 09:58, Potts, Ross A. wrote:
Has anyone else already on the list gotten the message that Someone
(possibly you) has requested that your email address be added?
It is dated today.
--
Axel Haenssen
Department of
Has anyone else already on the list gotten the message that Someone
(possibly you) has requested that your email address be added?
It is dated today.
Yup.
Looked to me like it was sent to the entire list.
Now, if anyone replies to that email, I guess the entire list is going to
get a second copy of every single email :(
Maybe time to unsubscribe
Nige
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Lars
yes,
i've got it, it was adressed to amanda-useres, so i think someone stupid tryed
to register amanda-users to amanda-users.
Christoph
Potts, Ross A. schrieb:
Has anyone else already on the list gotten the message that Someone
(possibly you) has requested that your email address be added?
It
Has anyone else already on the list gotten the message that Someone
(possibly you) has requested that your email address be added?
It is dated today.
Yes, I have, I was wondering about it myself...
On Tue, 2003-02-18 at 06:58, Potts, Ross A. wrote:
Has anyone else already on the list gotten the message that Someone
(possibly you) has requested that your email address be added?
It is dated today.
I got this also (timestamped 3:28am). I'm ignoring it, because I am
continuing to
On Tuesday, February 18, 2003, at 09:58 AM, Potts, Ross A. wrote:
Has anyone else already on the list gotten the message that Someone
(possibly you) has requested that your email address be added?
It is dated today.
From the message, it looks as though someone tried to register the
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 10:23:01AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 05:51:16PM -0500, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
On Mon, 17 Feb 2003 at 11:27pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
I am using an Exabyte Eliant 820 tape drive on Linux kernel 2.4.18 and
would like to make sure
Just for your information, on my Linux mtx's version (Slackware 8.1 with a
2.4.18 kernel) there is no such option nocompression to mtx... But there
are the options defcompression and compression which can be set to 0 then
it looks like that compression is disabled...
PS: thanks Joshua for your
My bad, I was having an OpenVMS moment. :P
Its really...
mt -f /dev/st0 compression off
Russell
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 05:52:44PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just for your information, on my Linux mtx's version (Slackware 8.1 with a
2.4.18 kernel) there is no such option
Hi! I realize that it's bad form to follow-up to yourself, but nobody
else seems to be, so...
On Friday, February 14, 2003, at 11:26 AM, Richard Morse wrote:
Hi! I have a 2.4.4b1 client, compiled on Cygwin. I'd like to use the
include list feature, so I upgraded my server from 2.4.2p2 to
On Tuesday, February 18, 2003, at 09:58 AM, Potts, Ross A. wrote:
Has anyone else already on the list gotten the message that Someone
(possibly you) has requested that your email address be added?
It is dated today.
I've notified the list manager in case they are unaware.
--
Jon
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 11:00:26AM -0600, Russell Adams wrote:
My bad, I was having an OpenVMS moment. :P
Its really...
mt -f /dev/st0 compression off
I don't have this either; I only have (from the manpage) a
datcompression that take 1(show) , 0 (disables) or nothing (enables)
as
I still haven't been able to determine why amanda reports success after
amdumps while amrecover still cannot read the file headers on the tapes.
Does anyone know why when I downgrade, the local host's filesystems being
backed up fail with missing estimates?
thanks
robin
Hi
Both computers are on the private network. 192.168.1.100 is the amanda
server and 192.168.1.47 is the client.
$amcheck DailySet1
gave this error
Amanda Backup Client Hosts Check
ERROR: 192.168.1.47: [addr 192.168.1.100: hostname lookup failed]
Client check: 1
Looked to me like it was sent to the entire list.
Now, if anyone replies to that email, I guess the entire list is going to
get a second copy of every single email :(
Maybe time to unsubscribe
As several folks figured out, someone messed up a subscription request
FOR amanda-users
On Tue, 18 Feb 2003 at 2:25pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
I still haven't been able to determine why amanda reports success after
amdumps while amrecover still cannot read the file headers on the tapes.
Can you read them manually? What amanda version?
Does anyone know why when I downgrade,
On Tuesday 18 February 2003 02:41 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 11:00:26AM -0600, Russell Adams wrote:
My bad, I was having an OpenVMS moment. :P
Its really...
mt -f /dev/st0 compression off
I don't have this either; I only have (from the manpage) a
datcompression
the estimates from all the other remote clients.
log.1 has lines for each of the failed filesystems:
FAIL planner hostname /disk/blah/restore 20030218 0 [missing result for
/disk/blah/restore in hostname response]
And what's in /tmp/amanda/sendsize*debug or /tmp/amanda/amandad*debug for
those backups
disks
but it can get the estimates from all the other remote clients.
log.1 has lines for each of the failed filesystems:
FAIL planner hostname /disk/blah/restore 20030218 0 [missing result for
/disk/blah/restore in hostname response]
I could put the other dozen filesystems listed in the logs here
I am adding a new system to our amanda backup system. The system has a
LARGE filesystem so I have
to use tar to divide it up some. amcheck runs fine, but when amdump runs I
get the following error
in the email report : Request to hostname timed out
The problematic client (Intel Solaris 8) gets
On Tue, 18 Feb 2003 at 10:13pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
My tape is on the same server that I want to back-up. Maybe this is not
optimal, but I can't change it...
Nothing wrong with it, really.
Due to this, I want to use a little holding disk, or even not use any
(I read that if the file to
On Fri, 14 Feb 2003, Paul Bijnens wrote:
For the record, I also had that problem with errors like Bad file
number and dgram_recv: timeout just after I upgraded to 2.4.3. I had
the problem for 3 consecutive nights, each night on different hosts.
I then recompiled and reinstalled the Amanda
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 02:55:40PM -0500, Qian Chen enlightened us:
Hi
Both computers are on the private network. 192.168.1.100 is the amanda
server and 192.168.1.47 is the client.
$amcheck DailySet1
gave this error
Amanda Backup Client Hosts Check
ERROR:
Thanks Dave and Paul,
Help much appreciated.
BTW
I know tapetype, what is amtatype??
On Wed, 19 Feb 2003 00:22, Paul Bijnens wrote:
Dave Ewall wrote:
I ran Tapetype on my Ultrium drive (came with a Dell Poweredge server),
and got this:
define tapetype Ultrium {
comment Ultrium
On Tue, 18 Feb 2003, Rebecca Pakish Crum wrote:
_Does the server have the client in /etc/hosts?
_Does the client have the server in /etc/hosts?
Thanks. I changed these two files and /etc/amanda/DailySet1/disklist
(server side). It was 192.168.1.47 /root comp-root-tar, changed it
to client
On Tuesday 18 February 2003 20:42, Gene Heskett wrote:
mt -f /dev/st0 datcompression 0
has worked as wanted (tapeinfo is showing the change).
A Side comment here in case the mt folks are watching. I would be
VERY nice if mt had the same syntax across all the platforms it
runs on.
But
Hi Folks,
I have been trying to archive about 20 Window's machines
(Win95/98/NT). Overall things seem to be working. Can anyone explain why
the estimates and real size vary so greatly? I have checked the hosts and
no new files are being created between the time the estimate is done and
the
UNSUBSCRIBE
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm going to post the following to the Wiki as well. This was a VXA-1
tape drive with V17 tapes. (My memory is a little fuzzy actually, I
can't remember if it's V10 or a V17...the numbers below seem to indicate
it's a V17).
[root@Galaxy Linux]#
On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 02:21:25PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I had only-root-readable index files, and the generated exlcude file
was empty.
IMHO amcheck should check that the exclude files on the client are
readable.
It should, unless you specified them to be
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 02:04:46PM +0100, Sven Rudolph wrote:
Jean-Louis Martineau [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 10:40:22AM +0100, Sven Rudolph wrote:
IMHO amcheck should check that the exclude files on the client are
readable.
It should, unless you specified
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 12:16:16PM -0500, Richard Morse wrote:
Hi! I realize that it's bad form to follow-up to yourself, but nobody
else seems to be, so...
On Friday, February 14, 2003, at 11:26 AM, Richard Morse wrote:
Hi! I have a 2.4.4b1 client, compiled on Cygwin. I'd like to use
50 matches
Mail list logo
