I have got it to work --- had to modify the group of amanda user in
/etc/passwd
Thanx
Madhvi
- Original Message -
From: Madhvi Gokool [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Joshua Baker-LePain [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 11:00 AM
Subject: Permissin denied
--
Someone (possibly you) has requested that your email address be added
to or deleted from the mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED].
If you really want this action to be taken, please send the following
commands (exactly as shown) back to [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
auth e7c6df57 subscribe
On 21 Feb 2003 at 2:58am, Xander D Harkness wrote
What I have tried to do is to generate a listing of the files in the
directory and back them up individually as disk entries
e.g.
fileserver /raid/solaris9.iso high-tar
However the result I get in amstatus is
On Fri February 21 2003 02:00, Madhvi Gokool wrote:
Hello
After changing the group of the user amanda to disk , when I run
amcheck , I ams till getiing the
Amanda Tape Server Host Check
-
ERROR: /dev/nst0: Permission denied
(expecting a new tape)
NOTE: skipping
Did everyone get YASM (Yet Another Subscribe Message) from the
majordomo this morning? Is someone trying to be funny, or is a
script kiddie exersizeing his talents?
--
Cheers, Gene
AMD K6-III@500mhz 320M
Athlon1600XP@1400mhz 512M
99.23% setiathome rank, not too shabby for a WV hillbilly
Hello
I'm trying to setup amanda2.4.4b1 on a win2000 machine with cygwin.
I followed the instruction in the HOWTO for cygwin but have the
following problem.
i run /usr/sbin/inetd -d on the win2000 machine
I run amcheck -c testdisk on my server
on my 2000 machine i got the follwoing messages
Good point...
But I think if you use amrmtape you are effectively saying that the tape is
no longer in use therefore you wouldn't use amrmtape if you intend reusing
the tape(s). So amrmtape behaviour shouldn't change from what it does now.
Not sure why you would want to amrmtape 'just one'...
If
Gene
Its being sent to the list, not just to you, but we've been assured that it
can't have any effect, and just to ignore them.
Cheers
Nige
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Gene Heskett
Sent: 21 February 2003 13:59
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi!
I have a DELL PowerVault 128T and a DELL PowerEDGE 1650.
I'm running FreeBSD with mtx and the chg-zd-mtx script.
FreeBSD doesn't recognize the tape devices, only /dev/pass0 as changer.
But there is no such thing as a npass0.
How do I tell the system that this device is supposed to be
Yes, I received it again as well.
Hi Kirk,
include works only at one level directory unless you try this untested
patch.
Jean-Louis
On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 07:57:38PM -0600, Kirk Strauser wrote:
I've been tinkering with my disklist entries. Right now, I'm using the
following setup to split a very large filesystem into a few
Is 2.4.4b1 the current realease or should I use something a
little older.
I'd like to be current but I've no real desire to run
beyond the edge.
I ran configure on Solaris 8 with --with-user and --with-group
but no other options.
configure ran fine and make ran fine until the changer-src
I'm sorry, I was obviously being stupid. Thinking about it
I've realized that B is obviously beta and I want to find
myself a P production release.
Well, maybe someone just had a hard time understanding how to sign up to
that list ;o)
On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 02:22:04PM -, Keith Hall wrote:
Good point...
But I think if you use amrmtape you are effectively saying that the tape is
no longer in use therefore you wouldn't use amrmtape if you intend reusing
the tape(s). So amrmtape behaviour shouldn't change from what it
On Friday, February 21, 2003, at 09:16 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hello
I'm trying to setup amanda2.4.4b1 on a win2000 machine with cygwin.
I followed the instruction in the HOWTO for cygwin but have the
following problem.
i run /usr/sbin/inetd -d on the win2000 machine
I run amcheck -c
On Fri, 21 Feb 2003 at 10:58am, Brian Cuttler wrote
Is 2.4.4b1 the current realease or should I use something a
little older.
b is for beta, although there are also some issues with 2.4.3.
I'd like to be current but I've no real desire to run
beyond the edge.
I'm running 2.4.4b1 on my big
Someone asked [EMAIL PROTECTED] to subscribe itself
Just ignore it, I guess...
- Original Message -
From: Rebecca Pakish Crum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 12:31 PM
Subject: RE: dummy subscribe message again
Yes, I
On Fri, 21 Feb 2003, Richard Morse wrote:
Hello
I'm trying to setup amanda2.4.4b1 on a win2000 machine with cygwin.
I followed the instruction in the HOWTO for cygwin but have the
following problem.
i run /usr/sbin/inetd -d on the win2000 machine
I run amcheck -c testdisk on
Hello.
Finally I made it to bulding Amanda on HP-UX 11.0a
Seems to be working, but I will only confirm that after properly
configuring Amanda.
I need to do a full backup off a couple of directories situated on
two different HP-UX machines over the same network.
What would be the preferreed
On Fri February 21 2003 10:06, Nigel Barker wrote:
Gene
Its being sent to the list, not just to you, but we've been
assured that it can't have any effect, and just to ignore them.
Cheers
Nige
Well, considering the consequences if it wasn't somehow filtered,
I've been tapping the little red x
On Fri February 21 2003 10:58, Brian Cuttler wrote:
Is 2.4.4b1 the current realease or should I use something a
little older.
The most recent snapshot was dated the 20th, and I built it
installed it and ran it last night with no problems that I could
see here.
I'd like to be current but I've
On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 04:02:19PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
I have a DELL PowerVault 128T and a DELL PowerEDGE 1650.
I'm running FreeBSD with mtx and the chg-zd-mtx script.
FreeBSD doesn't recognize the tape devices, only /dev/pass0 as changer.
But there is no such thing as a
I got this report from amanda. It looks to me like it's reporting that
it used 48.9% of the tape (a DLT 4000 20/40GB), but that it ran out of
space.
These dumps were to tape Indyme008.
*** A TAPE ERROR OCCURRED: [[writing file: No space left on device]].
Some dumps may have been left in the
On Fri, 21 Feb 2003 at 11:51am, John Oliver wrote
I got this report from amanda. It looks to me like it's reporting that
it used 48.9% of the tape (a DLT 4000 20/40GB), but that it ran out of
space.
Not quite. 48.9% of the tape was filled successfully. However...
FAILURE AND STRANGE
On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 03:46:44PM -0500, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
On Fri, 21 Feb 2003 at 11:51am, John Oliver wrote
I got this report from amanda. It looks to me like it's reporting that
it used 48.9% of the tape (a DLT 4000 20/40GB), but that it ran out of
space.
Not quite.
[posted and Cc'ed]
On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 11:51:59AM -0800, John Oliver wrote:
I got this report from amanda. It looks to me like it's reporting that
it used 48.9% of the tape (a DLT 4000 20/40GB), but that it ran out of
space.
Let's see
Total Full
On Fri, 21 Feb 2003 at 1:08pm, John Oliver wrote
On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 03:46:44PM -0500, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
On Fri, 21 Feb 2003 at 11:51am, John Oliver wrote
I got this report from amanda. It looks to me like it's reporting that
it used 48.9% of the tape (a DLT 4000
On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 01:08:10PM -0800, John Oliver wrote:
Why is it, then, that 17 filesystems compressed to 10GB, but this one
No, 18 filesystems compressed to 10GB, problem was on the 19th, right?
filesystem isn't being compressed at all, apparently?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# df
On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 01:08:10PM -0800, John Oliver wrote:
On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 03:46:44PM -0500, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
On Fri, 21 Feb 2003 at 11:51am, John Oliver wrote
I got this report from amanda. It looks to me like it's reporting that
it used 48.9% of the tape (a DLT
On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 04:44:37PM -0500, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
Well, I have no idea how much of that 21GB changed -- have a look at the
estimate which will be in /tmp/amanda/sendsize*debug and in an amdump.N
file. Also, only 10GB or so was written to tape from that fs. It also
On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 02:26:22PM -0800, John Oliver wrote:
Since we're seeing 18 fulls and 1 daily, it smells like you're dumping
a whole bunch of new DLE's on amanda at the same time? If so, you'll
probably be OK tonight, just don't put any more new DLE's in.
DLE?
disklist entry.
I
Server is Linux 2.4.20, Amanda 2.4.4b1 Troublesome client is
Linux 2.4.18, Amanda 2.4.4b1. 108 other DLEs on other systems are
working fine. I'm using dump for my backups.
/-- Odin /home lev 1 STRANGE
sendbackup: start [Odin:/home level 1]
sendbackup: info BACKUP=/sbin/dump
sendbackup:
On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 02:58:16PM -0800, Jay Lessert wrote:
On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 02:26:22PM -0800, John Oliver wrote:
Since we're seeing 18 fulls and 1 daily, it smells like you're dumping
a whole bunch of new DLE's on amanda at the same time? If so, you'll
probably be OK tonight,
On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 06:14:37PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
Humm, if thats a 40gig tape (with compression) it would be about a
20 gigger without. And if hardware compression is also enabled, it
would not be unusual to over-run the EOT because the compressed
stuff you are sending it will
[Posted and Cc'ed]
My last posting on this thread, we're in tapeout crunch right now...
On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 03:43:13PM -0800, John Oliver wrote:
No, not really... :-) My tapes are 20GB without compression. I'm
telling amanda to use compression. It looks like it's saying it is.
And it
I'm drowning in bounce messages here, so would somebody please tell
me who this [EMAIL PROTECTED] really is.
I get at least one of these for every reply I send to the list, and
only to the list if its a John Collier posting.
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: Delivery Status
On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 03:49:32PM -0800, John Oliver wrote:
On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 06:14:37PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
Throw in that marketing is usually a bit optimistic in saying its a
20 gigger without compression, and that always needs a fudge factor
when actually estimating,
38 matches
Mail list logo
