Does your kernel include device sa?
Your tape should be recognized as /dev/.*sa[0-9]
For instance :
Waiting 5 seconds for SCSI devices to settle
sa0 at ahc0 bus 0 target 5 lun 0
sa0: HP C1533A 9503 Removable Sequential Access SCSI-2 device
sa0: 10.000MB/s transfers (10.000MHz, offset 8)
Hi,
we use Amanda version 2.4.2p2 with HP SureStore DLT.
Every night after backup i get an email like this below, where i do not
understand all messages (our company name was replaced by company).
But the backup seems to work fine, and the speed also.
My questions:
1) What does the message
Gregor Ibic wrote:
Ok, I have done some symlinks to data directories and create a few tapes
with amlabel.
What you say is very confusing. Why did you create symlinks for?
Normally symlinks are not followed when making backups.
I create backup, first full and then incremental. It works ok.
Hello
I have configured amanda on a test server . If I modify a parameter in the
config.site file , do I have to go through the following steps before the
changes are applied : -
run ./configure, make , make install ???
Is there a quicker way
Thanx in advance
M
On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 09:47:05AM +0100, Dalton Hubert wrote:
Hi,
we use Amanda version 2.4.2p2 with HP SureStore DLT.
Every night after backup i get an email like this below, where i do not
understand all messages (our company name was replaced by company).
But the backup seems to work
Title: Rehberim.de
Please wait
Bu mail Spam degildir...Rehberim.de Avrupa'da Turklerin ve Turk Is dunyasinin Ticari ve Mesleki Rehberidir...Bu tur mailleri almak istemiyorsanz, lutfen bize iletin. Verdigimiz rahatsizliktan dolayi ozur dileriz.
Remove me from this Email list
On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 09:23:10AM +0100, Konrad Dienst wrote:
Does your kernel include device sa?
Your tape should be recognized as /dev/.*sa[0-9]
For instance :
Waiting 5 seconds for SCSI devices to settle
sa0 at ahc0 bus 0 target 5 lun 0
sa0: HP C1533A 9503 Removable
I've been playing with rait I haven't been successful yet.
Is rait touchy about the tape drives being identical? My 3rd exb8505 was
dead from the get go so I tried using an ait-1 in it's place.
amlabel amdump seem to run fine, but I cannot get amrestore to pull the
backups off tape. It
Hum. I thought the same originally as well. But I have about a
dozen tapes reacting the same way. Half are new and half are old. I use
vxa-1 v17 tapes. I find it unlikely that so many are defective/went bad
all together in one shot. What does your experience say?
robin
On Thu, 20 Feb
Is there any way to make amanda work in standalone mode or with tcpserver?
I really do not want to have to install inetd...
--
Casey Allen Shobe / Software Developer Linux Administrator
SecureWorks, Inc. / 404.327.6339 x169 / Fax: 404.728.0144
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / http://www.secureworks.net
On Mon February 24 2003 05:50, Madhvi Gokool wrote:
Hello
I have configured amanda on a test server . If I modify a
parameter in the config.site file , do I have to go through the
following steps before the changes are applied : -
run ./configure, make , make install ???
Is there a quicker
I had many VXA-1 v17 tapes act this way with amanda with 2 different
internal VXA drives. I have also tried an older external drive that never
showed the behavior. I have since replace the internal drive with VXA-2
(basically, in order to get more capacity out of the tapes I'm reusing)
and the
On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 05:06:08PM -0800, Jay Lessert wrote:
[Posted and Cc'ed]
Why? I subscribe... :-)
My last posting on this thread, we're in tapeout crunch right now...
On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 03:43:13PM -0800, John Oliver wrote:
No, not really... :-) My tapes are 20GB without
my kernel config just mentions the sa driver. (no zero or one etc)
that way it should detect the sa devices on boot. Once you've got that
far you may need to make the /dev/*sa0 devices by
cd /dev
Makedev sa0
--
Martin Hepworth
Senior Systems Administrator
Solid State Logic Ltd
+44 (0)1865
On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 09:10:35PM -0500, Jon LaBadie wrote:
On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 03:49:32PM -0800, John Oliver wrote:
On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 06:14:37PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
Throw in that marketing is usually a bit optimistic in saying its a
20 gigger without compression,
On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 02:42:31PM -0800, Jay Lessert wrote:
See also got result in amdump.1, it'll tell you if there's any
difference between a level0 and level1 estimate.
planner: time 10.451: got result for host backup disk /dev/hda1: 0 -
21156480K, 1 - 19996640K, 2 - 19996600K
I've posted this a few days ago, but I guess it slipped through the
list. Here I post it again.
I need to backup the first drive to the second hard drive on the same
machine (client + server), but encounter this when running amdump.
Here're the config. and the error mail
Thank you
I've posted this a few days ago, but I guess it slipped through the
list. Here I post it again.
I need to backup the first drive to the second hard drive on the same
machine (client + server), but encounter this when running amdump.
Here're the config. and the error mail
Thank you
Sorry for
On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 10:03:53AM -0800, John Oliver wrote:
Hopefully, this issue will be resolved in a couple of weeks when I get a
DLT7000 library in here. But I would like to understand the basic issue
here... I don't want to be limited to 35GB with a unit that should be
able to
On Mon February 24 2003 13:03, John Oliver wrote:
On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 09:10:35PM -0500, Jon LaBadie wrote:
On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 03:49:32PM -0800, John Oliver wrote:
On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 06:14:37PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
Throw in that marketing is usually a bit optimistic in
--On Monday, February 24, 2003 10:03:53 -0800 John Oliver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 09:10:35PM -0500, Jon LaBadie wrote:
On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 03:49:32PM -0800, John Oliver wrote:
On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 06:14:37PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
Throw in that marketing is
On Monday, February 24, 2003, at 01:03 PM, John Oliver wrote:
On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 09:10:35PM -0500, Jon LaBadie wrote:
On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 03:49:32PM -0800, John Oliver wrote:
On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 06:14:37PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
Throw in that marketing is usually a bit
On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 10:51:06AM -0800, bao wrote:
I've posted this a few days ago, but I guess it slipped through the
list. Here I post it again.
I need to backup the first drive to the second hard drive on the same
machine (client + server), but encounter this when running amdump.
Has anyone seen a situation in which amcheck succeeds yet amdump fails
with the following:
FAILURE AND STRANGE DUMP SUMMARY:
mail /home lev 2 FAILED [could not connect to mail]
mail /var/spool/mail lev 2 FAILED [could not connect to mail]
I know that this is an iptables problem.
info
help
end
--
Dr. Karl Hudnut System Administrator UCAR - COSMIC
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.cosmic.ucar.edu303 497 8024
On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 02:27:18PM -0500, Matt Hyclak wrote:
You're getting your math confused, I think. If your tapetype defines
compression, then what is in your holding disk is already compressed. Your
tape drive should be in non-compression mode then and should hold 20GB of
*already
On Mon, 24 Feb 2003 at 1:52pm, Karl Hudnut wrote
Has anyone seen a situation in which amcheck succeeds yet amdump fails
with the following:
FAILURE AND STRANGE DUMP SUMMARY:
mail /home lev 2 FAILED [could not connect to mail]
mail /var/spool/mail lev 2 FAILED [could not
[ On Sunday, February 23, 2003 at 23:14:37 (-0500), Mark Radabaugh wrote: ]
Subject: Binding amanda to specific interface
I'm trying to run Amanda on FreeBSD on a machine with multiple IP's bound to
the ethernet interface. Amanda seems to insist on picking the alias
interface rather than the
On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 10:43:12AM -0800, John Oliver wrote:
The sudden jump in the size of this backup was caused when I moved the
holdingdisk. It didn't occur to me that I was moving it on to the
filesystem I was backing up... :-) I just added /hold to the exclude
file. So, backups will
CCed back to the list for the archives...
On Mon, 24 Feb 2003 at 3:01pm, Karl Hudnut wrote
Thanks for your help. I don't seem to have that documentation in any of
the rpms I have here. It doesn's seem to be in the tarballs from
amanda.org either. Can you help me find it?
?? I just
Hi
I have seen something very interesting on the changelog of
amanda2.4.4b1
it s the ability of amrecover ( and related servers ) to use the
changer.
i have setup successfully amanda with a tapeless configuration with
the chg-multi script.
then i m trying to configure the amrecover to use the
Joshua:
You are correct, there is a docs directory in the 2.4.3 tarball and it has
the PORTS.USAGE document.
Thanks again. And sorry for disseminating missinformation.
--
Dr. Karl Hudnut System Administrator UCAR - COSMIC
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.cosmic.ucar.edu303 497
Hallo,
first I say sorry for your trouble with my bounce-mails.
This weekend I setup my new Mail-Backupserver. After this work I test a new
version of my Spamcheck-script. In this script I call rblcheck. My mistake
was the test via list.dsbl.org.
The big prob by my was that the powerline
Well, I'm using xinetd as a (hopefully) temporary solution. The security
issues are my primary concern for not wanting to use it. I prefer to run
everything as a standalone daemon if possible (i.e. sshd, httpd, xfs, etc.).
xinetd was easy enough to get working though, and I've currently got
BTW, it's not really that hard at all to keep your reverse DNS fully
consistent for multi-homed hosts reachable on multiple subnets, though
of course it does help to have a well considered naming plan.
--
Greg A. Woods
The problem is the forward lookup rather than the reverse DNS. If you
BTW, it's not really that hard at all to keep your reverse DNS fully
consistent for multi-homed hosts reachable on multiple subnets, though
of course it does help to have a well considered naming plan.
--
Greg A. Woods
The problem is the forward lookup rather than the reverse DNS. If you
Hello,
The Amanda core team is pleased to announce the release of Amanda
2.4.4. It is the latest stable release of amanda.
It can be dowloaded from http://www.amanda.org/
Here's a list of the changes for release 2.4.4 (from the NEWS file):
Look at the ChangeLog file for more details.
* New -a
I was thinking about backing up using snapshots. Is there any
best-practices way to do this cleanly?
I was going to just script the lvcreate/lvremove stuff around the
amdump, but figured someone may have a more comprehensive approach.
--
-rupa
[ On Monday, February 24, 2003 at 20:09:07 (-0500), Mark Radabaugh wrote: ]
Subject: Re: Binding amanda to specific interface
The problem is the forward lookup rather than the reverse DNS. If you give
2 different IP addresses to the same hostname BIND will round-robin the 2
addresses -
[ On Monday, February 24, 2003 at 19:36:46 (-0500), Casey Shobe wrote: ]
Subject: RE: tcpserver
Well, I'm using xinetd as a (hopefully) temporary solution. The security
issues are my primary concern for not wanting to use it. I prefer to run
everything as a standalone daemon if possible
40 matches
Mail list logo
