Localhost has its inetd.conf and services modified correctly by the
client setup script, as evidenced by telnetting to localhost:10080
pressing ENTER, output follows:
I found the amcheck version of the answer on FAQ-o-Matic:
http://amanda.sourceforge.net/fom-serve/cache/16.html
I also
Yes, that's the frist thing I prove... Something like settape
localhost:eu.xxd:/path/to/my/virtual/tapeNN.
Any ideas?
Thanks
-Mensaje original-
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
En nombre de Jean-Louis Martineau
Enviado el: miércoles, 19 de marzo de 2003 3:34
Para:
Joshua Baker-LePain schrieb:
Is the kernel to old?
Well, given that current is 2.4.20... It's also not a release kernel
(note the pre). I know nothing about Debian, but I'd strongly recommend
upgrading at least to a released 2.2 series kernel (it's actually still
maintained -- 2.2.25 just
hello
I'm trying amanda. But amcheck doesn't work :
Amanda Backup Client Hosts Check
WARNING: helium: selfcheck request timed out. Host down?
WARNING: carbone.edge-it.subnet: selfcheck request timed out. Host down?
Client check: 2 hosts checked in 30.005
Title: Kopitek
OZELLIKLER
:
Dakikada 12 A4 sayfa fotokopi
Sadece Toner kullanimi
(Developersiz sistem)
Cok Yonluluk %70-%141
kucultme ve buyultme
On Thu, 2003-03-20 at 01:50, anne wrote:
I'm trying amanda. But amcheck doesn't work :
Amanda Backup Client Hosts Check
WARNING: helium: selfcheck request timed out. Host down?
WARNING: carbone.edge-it.subnet: selfcheck request timed out. Host down?
Client
Hello
I have been testing how many filesystem full dumps of the servers on my
network could be stored on a specific tape.
An excerpt of the dump summary is as follows: -
DUMPER STATSTAPER STATS
HOSTNAME DISKL ORIG-KB OUT-KB COMP%
On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 10:50:42AM +0100, anne enlightened us:
hello
I'm trying amanda. But amcheck doesn't work :
Amanda Backup Client Hosts Check
WARNING: helium: selfcheck request timed out. Host down?
WARNING: carbone.edge-it.subnet: selfcheck request
The sencrypt ssl patch (
http://cns.utoronto.ca/~pkern/stuff/amanda-patch/) has been around
for a while now, and seems to work well as simple approach to encrypting
amanda network traffic. As it is an unobtrusive, configurable patch
could it be assimilated into the mainstream Amanda code base,
I will reiterate what I posted to the list several months ago. This is for
the list maintainer:
If you maintain an open and unmoderated list, eventually the spam and
offensive material that hits this list is going to become too much for
folks. Also, you may find yourself with legal problems if
On Thu, 20 Mar 2003 at 3:31pm, Madhvi Gokool wrote
I have been testing how many filesystem full dumps of the servers on my
network could be stored on a specific tape.
An excerpt of the dump summary is as follows: -
DUMPER STATSTAPER STATS
On Wed, 19 Mar 2003 at 4:09pm, Seth, Wayne (Contractor) wrote
Since signing up on the Amanda list serve about 2 or 3 weeks ago, my e-mail
address seems to have distributed to several pornographic spammers. Because
of that, I cannot continue with the list. Please unsubscribe me.
To be clear,
On Thursday 20 March 2003 01:31 am, Madhvi Gokool wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] restoredir]$ amrestore /dev/st0 osama /
It looks like you're using the auto-rewinding tape device. If you try
'/dev/nst0', it might work better for you.
Hello,
I 'm trying to backup a Linux client, as it looks now everything is
looking fine in the client. But when I try to do an amcheck in the server I
received the following error.
I'm completely sure that is my mistake in one of the config files,
but I checked many times and I
On Thu, 20 Mar 2003 at 8:02am, Martinez, Michael - CSREES/ISTM wrote
I think you should implement a spam prevention policy and a moderated list.
Are you volunteering to be moderator? I'm not at all involved with
running this list, but it seems to me that, given the pretty high traffic,
Joshua,
The spam comes both ways. In all cases so far, the message part is in
several foreign languages, so probably not from one source. My feeling is
that somehow the spammers have gotten into to amanda user-list database and
are using it directly.
Wayne Seth
COE Lab Manager
520-538-0110
Hey there people...
I hope this isn't too off topic, as it's related to Samba, but only
while using Amanda, as far as I can tell.
I was wondering if anybody else has had these types of issues while
backing up Windows machines via samba (hopefully I'm not the only person
trying to do something so
If the spam was directly to you and not through the list, then the reason
is that the spammers search through webpages for email addresses, and since
most mailing lists have a web-archive, you really cannot expect your email
address to remain private after you post to a mailing list.
Stopping
Martinez, Michael - CSREES/ISTM on Thu 20/03 08:02 -0500:
I will reiterate what I posted to the list several months
ago. This is for the list maintainer:
If you maintain an open and unmoderated list, eventually
the spam and offensive material that hits this list is
going to become too much
Title: Nachricht
Hello,
I want to save a
windows share on am win2k-workstation. I test the share with smbmount
//bv-miene/test -o username=amanda/agki (amanda is the backup account in the
agki domain). And it works.
Now I want to
register it in the disklist and amandapass.
But how can I
The best solution is probably the easiest to do.
Restrict the mail relay for the mailing list to members only.
Whenever a member spams the list, he/she/it is removed from the list and
banned for some period of time (1 to 6 months seems reasonable).
Junk spams from outsiders should be dropped
Environment: amanda 2.4.4, Solaris 9, mtx 1.2.17rel
I was running amanda 2.4.3 with the chg-zd-mtx from 2.4.4
and mtx 1.2.12(?) on Solaris 8 but things got wonky when
I started the Solaris 9 upgrade.
What I'm currently seeing is also a little odd.
1) I'm seeing that # amtape newtonr update
On Thu, 2003-03-20 at 05:43, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
On Thu, 20 Mar 2003 at 8:02am, Martinez, Michael - CSREES/ISTM wrote
I think you should implement a spam prevention policy and a moderated list.
Are you volunteering to be moderator?
My $0.02: unmoderated.
I very
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on Thu 20/03 08:58 -0600:
Whenever a member spams the list, he/she/it is removed
from the list and banned for some period of time (1 to 6
months seems reasonable).
this doesn't help the main problem, which is list archive
address harvesting.
There is no solution to this
On Thu, 20 Mar 2003, Seth, Wayne (Contractor) wrote:
several foreign languages, so probably not from one source. My feeling is
that somehow the spammers have gotten into to amanda user-list database and
are using it directly.
Or perhaps they've found your email address in a post on one of
Albert,
Am I correct in assuming you have not been introduced to the military?
The phrases US Military, should be, and reality in the same sentence
is a contradiction. The reality is that the military, and the us government
in general, seem to have a severe case of pornophobia (is that a
On Thu, 20 Mar 2003, David Raistrick wrote:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amanda-users/message/42277
Of course, now I notice that groups.yahoo is finally obfuscating the email
addresses.
Other list archives are not, though:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=amanda-usersm=104812034407134w=2
All I know is, none of the other email lists I subscribe to have this
problem. I'm not just going around blatantly complaining to every list about
any little old issue that comes up. I mean, with this list here, it's really
getting annoying receiving so much spam.
Martinez, Michael
Seth,
I'm not getting that spam via the list. maybe my address got
out that way but its not the vector for the incoming.
Brian
If the spam was directly to you and not through the list, then the reason
is that the spammers search through webpages for email addresses, and since
most mailing
So unsubscribe.
Probably the amanda people would not appreciate that statement.
Also, you may find yourself with legal problems if you
allow someone to post illegal material to your list.
Oh please, what are you trying to threaten people because
you can't be bothered to filter your
Hi all.
I have a HP C7200 (Dell powervault 128T) medium changer that i cant figure
out how to talk to. I have read the chg-scsi instructions but i havent managed
to understand what to do other than the big-picture. That doesnt help when
it comes to details (the devil is in the details, someone
Brian Cuttler wrote:
Seth,
I'm not getting that spam via the list. maybe my address got
out that way but its not the vector for the incoming.
That's very odd. All the spam I get is through the list -- porn or otherwise.
Why is the list set up to allow non-subscribers to post to it?
On Thursday 20 March 2003 11:34 am, Scott Mcdermott wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on Thu 20/03 08:58 -0600:
Whenever a member spams the list, he/she/it is removed
from the list and banned for some period of time (1 to 6
months seems reasonable).
this doesn't help the main problem, which is
For the Spam mails that I have been receiving, each of them have
gone through the mail list server. Maybe I am missing the ones
that our corporate mail server blocks?
Don
Donald L. (Don) Ritchey
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Scott Mcdermott [mailto:[EMAIL
I have a C5713A and this its my configuration,...
For cat /proc/scsi/scsi
Attached devices:
Host: scsi0 Channel: 00 Id: 05 Lun: 00
Vendor: HP Model: C5713A Rev: H107
Type: Sequential-AccessANSI SCSI revision: 02
Host: scsi0 Channel: 00 Id: 05 Lun: 01
I use spamassasin. And I've never seen porno from this list. Although I
don't think I'd mind too much (hehehe...).
quit your whining and filter spam. The list is not the cause of spam,
spammers are.
Frank Tore Johansen wrote:
If the spam was directly to you and not through the list, then the
On Thu, 20 Mar 2003 at 6:07pm, Mats Blomstrand wrote
I have a HP C7200 (Dell powervault 128T) medium changer that i cant figure
out how to talk to. I have read the chg-scsi instructions but i havent managed
to understand what to do other than the big-picture. That doesnt help when
it comes
One of the things that might help is to limit majordomo's who access to
list members. I have tried this from a yahoo account, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
is happy to supply me with a list of all subscribers to the amanda-users
list. I suppose it would do so for the other lists as well. I see no
On Thu, 20 Mar 2003 at 12:46pm, Marty Shannon, RHCE wrote
I'm not getting that spam via the list. maybe my address got
out that way but its not the vector for the incoming.
That's very odd. All the spam I get is through the list -- porn or otherwise.
Why is the list set up to allow
Jon LaBadie wrote:
On Wed, Mar 19, 2003 at 02:18:21PM -0800, bao wrote:
As a followup to my previous mail.
I have repeatedly tried amrecover with different disks in my config. The
small disk (with original 760 MB, after backup ~380 MB) seems to let me
recover. The bigger disk (original ~ 18
Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
On Thu, 20 Mar 2003 at 12:46pm, Marty Shannon, RHCE wrote
I'm not getting that spam via the list. maybe my address got
out that way but its not the vector for the incoming.
That's very odd. All the spam I get is through the list -- porn or otherwise.
Marty Shannon, RHCE on Thu 20/03 12:46 -0500:
That's very odd. All the spam I get is through the list
-- porn or otherwise.
I don't get any spam off the amanda-users list either btw.
What must be happening is that the spammers are forging
from-headers and sending to addresses they have
Every other list I subscribe to is moderated.
Really? Are you sure that they don't simply restrict posting by
requiring a subscription to post?
A classic moderated list requires each individual message to be approved
by a human before it is distributed to the list. This requires much more
On Thursday 20 March 2003 01:50 pm, bao wrote:
Jon, I have done some search for Linux file size. It says:
For ext2/3 and kernel 2.4.x, file size: ~ 4TB, filesystem size: ~ 1TB.
Obviously, it can't be the kernel that imposes this limit. Morever, I
was able to get a dump, using tar, of size 9
Hi,
I'm having problems getting amanda (2.4.1p1) configured to use gnutar.
There
may be a different way to do what I need and if so please let me know.
We
are trying to back up files from a NAS device.
When I run amcheck I get a message that says
Error: tycho.wmi.com: [Can not execute
Title: LoLita Resim ve Videolari
INDIR IZLE
INDIR IZLE
INDIR IZLE
INDIR IZLE
INDIR IZLE
INDIR IZLE
INDIR IZLE
INDIR IZLE
Maybe I'm just wrong. I guess I could be getting spam from
the list that comes with the originator's email address
rather than something indicating amanda in name or subject.
I take it all back, I don't know. All I know is that I'm not
in a position where subscription to a valid work related
On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 12:46:18PM -0500, Marty Shannon, RHCE wrote:
Why is the list set up to allow non-subscribers to post to it?
Ummm... Because people who don't subscribe to the list might want to
ask a question about amana?
Scott Mcdermott wrote:
Marty Shannon, RHCE on Thu 20/03 12:46 -0500:
That's very odd. All the spam I get is through the list
-- porn or otherwise.
I don't get any spam off the amanda-users list either btw.
What must be happening is that the spammers are forging
from-headers and
Marty Shannon, RHCE on Thu 20/03 13:50 -0500:
*All* lists *I'm* on -- with the exception of this one --
do not permit any access by non-subscribers (except to
subscribe, of course).
Agreed. This is standard practice on most lists and cuts
down radically on direct spam to the list itself.
Uncle! I have been trying to get amanda working on a RedHat 7.3 box for
a while now. I am probably missing something small or obvious that I am
just not getting. I am running Amanda 2.4.4. Some help would be greatly
appreciated.
I have made the entries in the xinet.d as follows:
# default:
On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 12:01:26PM -0500, Martinez, Michael - CSREES/ISTM wrote:
Also, you may find yourself with legal problems if you
allow someone to post illegal material to your list.
Oh please, what are you trying to threaten people because
you can't be bothered to filter your
[EMAIL PROTECTED](Scott Mcdermott) 20.03.03 11:34
Once upon a time Scott Mcdermott shaped the electrons to say...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on Thu 20/03 08:58 -0600:
Whenever a member spams the list, he/she/it is removed
from the list and banned for some period of time (1 to 6
months seems
[EMAIL PROTECTED](Seth, Wayne (Contractor)) 20.03.03 07:21
Joshua,
The spam comes both ways.
I searched and the last three spams went totally normally
to amanda-user
Be cause i never mail with my subscription address to any mailing list
i can be quite sure that the database is not
in the
Unlike many I've seen, it actually came *through* the list -- or so it appears.
Received: from guinness.omniscient.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by
guinness.omniscient.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h2KJr8EL029329
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for
[EMAIL
Make sure amanda(or what ever user you are running amanda as) is a
member of the group backup.
Joe
IDI
Joel wrote:
Hi,
I'm having problems getting amanda (2.4.1p1) configured to use gnutar.
There
may be a different way to do what I need and if so please let me know.
We
are trying to back up
On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 02:19:54PM -0500, Scott Mcdermott wrote:
Marty Shannon, RHCE on Thu 20/03 12:46 -0500:
That's very odd. All the spam I get is through the list
-- porn or otherwise.
I don't get any spam off the amanda-users list either btw.
I happen to archive the lists I read.
Is there some confusion here with terminology...
moderated mailing list does not equal qualified-posting to mailing list...
i.e. qualified by list membership...
just checking if this is a misunderstanding amongst some subscribers?
If so, this discussion for/against qualified posting has come up
Brian Cuttler on Thu 20/03 15:21 -0500:
That and I'm pretty handy with the delete key, anything
that is in HTML or meantions my size in the first two
lines goes.
and sadly, that covers about 95% of spam :)
Dave Sherohman on Thu 20/03 14:36 -0600:
Why is the list set up to allow non-subscribers to post
to it?
Ummm... Because people who don't subscribe to the list
might want to ask a question about amana?
ummm... we're supposed to all get spammed to accomodate the
fact that you are too lazy
c) I've never heard of a list admin even being threatened with legal
action over the content of list messages except in cases where the list
was explicitly dedicated to the distribution of illegal content.
I believe this happened on the Exim list.
and likely others...
On Thursday, March 20, 2003, at 03:42 PM, Scott Mcdermott wrote:
Marty Shannon, RHCE on Thu 20/03 13:50 -0500:
*All* lists *I'm* on -- with the exception of this one --
do not permit any access by non-subscribers (except to
subscribe, of course).
Agreed. This is standard practice on most lists
On Thu, 20 Mar 2003 at 12:29pm, Jeanne Case wrote
Uncle! I have been trying to get amanda working on a RedHat 7.3 box for
a while now. I am probably missing something small or obvious that I am
just not getting. I am running Amanda 2.4.4. Some help would be greatly
appreciated.
I
Thomas Hu on Thu 20/03 17:26 -0500:
Have we enjoyed talking about spam so far? Is this still
an amanda list? Are we interested in spam more than in
amanda? Finally, is enough enough?
The same discussion occurs about every year or so on many
lists. Those that aren't interested can hit their
Have we reached the point yet where the spam discussion has generated
more list messages today than all the spam that's crossed it in the
past year?
-Mitch
Have we enjoyed talking about spam so far? Is this still an amanda
list? Are we interested in spam more than in amanda? Finally, is enough
enough?
Thomas
unsubscribe amanda-users [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi all
I have a very large disk (700GB) where my users have their $HOME's.
Can someone please help me with a example disklist file for user 'foo'
and 'bar' on separate images?
Reading manpages, the amanda chapter and other textfiles i have come
up with this:
hostname home_foo /home/foo {
At 2003-03-20T13:02:16Z, Martinez, Michael - CSREES/ISTM [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Us folks that work in government have strict rules about pornography and
are under surveillance from our Security people who are on the watch for
this kind of activity.
I'm sure that's true. I know that no
At 2003-03-20T20:42:52Z, Scott Mcdermott [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
There is no reason someone should not want to subscribe to the list to
post.
That's not true:
Oh, crap, my server just melted, and I'm having trouble getting Amanda to
work! I need an answer ASAP! I know, I'll send an email
Kirk Strauser wrote:
At 2003-03-20T20:42:52Z, Scott Mcdermott [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
There is no reason someone should not want to subscribe to the list to
post.
That's not true:
Oh, crap, my server just melted, and I'm having trouble getting Amanda to
work! I need an answer
Have we enjoyed talking about spam so far? Is this still
an amanda list? Are we interested in spam more than in
amanda? Finally, is enough enough?
The same discussion occurs about every year or so on many
lists. Those that aren't interested can hit their
delete-thread key.
I am trying a test amrestore of some files after amanda has run for a
bit on a RedHat 8.0 system with an HP DDS-3 6-tape changer. The backups
are fine, as are the automatic tape changes; I can get at all of my
backups manually with dd and tar. However, amrestore is not happy.
The details:
Title: DECODER
SiFRELi TV/UYDU YAYINLARI
ARTIK BEDAVA!
Turkiyede Ilk Defa!...
Isterseniz Bilgisayardan:
74 matches
Mail list logo
