On Tue, 7 May 2019 22:27:14 +
Chris Hassell wrote:
> There we go! Debian 9.0 looks good to me.
>
> % bash autogen && ./packaging/deb/buildpkg
Chris, I am going to try duplicating your work.
One thing I have learned is to build test environments on throwaway
machines. I now use virtual
On Wednesday 08 May 2019 01:37:03 pm Debra S Baddorf wrote:
> > On May 7, 2019, at 9:38 PM, Gene Heskett
> > wrote:
> >
> > echo "!! Warning !!!"
> > echo "Amanda needs to be configured and built by the"
> > echo "user amanda, but must be installed by
> "CH" == Chris Hassell writes:
CH> Most build systems these days recommend building entirely as a
CH> normal user (even Debian?) and the chown-and-other-ops are done with
CH> careful setuid privileges given to the build system.
CH> RPM and rpmbuild have been doing it that way for years.
* Chris Hoogendyk [20190508 14:08]:
> I've always done all the configure, build and install from root,
> using the --with-user=amanda and --with-group=amanda in configure.
> Then all my backup and administrative operations are done as user
> amanda. No problems going back 15 years or so.
>
> On
I've always done all the configure, build and install from root, using the --with-user=amanda and
--with-group=amanda in configure. Then all my backup and administrative operations are done as user
amanda. No problems going back 15 years or so.
On 5/8/19 1:37 PM, Debra S Baddorf wrote:
On
Most build systems these days recommend building entirely as a normal
user (even Debian?) and the chown-and-other-ops are done with careful
setuid privileges given to the build system.
RPM and rpmbuild have been doing it that way for years.
On 5/8/19 11:37 AM, Debra S Baddorf wrote:
>
>> On May
> On May 7, 2019, at 9:38 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
>
> echo "!! Warning !!!"
> echo "Amanda needs to be configured and built by the"
> echo "user amanda, but must be installed by user root."
Is this actually still true? I always configure
On Wednesday 08 May 2019 01:48:03 am Jon LaBadie wrote:
> On Wed, May 08, 2019 at 12:01:42AM +, Chris Hassell wrote:
> > I don't allow a script to alter the repo unless it's in big neon.
>
> ...
>
> > It does (if I recall correctly) require a user "amandabackup" to
> > exist, but that's all.
On Wed, May 08, 2019 at 12:01:42AM +, Chris Hassell wrote:
> I don't allow a script to alter the repo unless it's in big neon.
>
...
>
> It does (if I recall correctly) require a user "amandabackup" to exist, but
> that's all. The user 'amanda' (?), not so sure if that's made in the build
On Tuesday 07 May 2019 08:01:42 pm Chris Hassell wrote:
> I don't allow a script to alter the repo unless it's in big neon.
>
> This is (btw) all placed in github ... so the actual clone is 'git
> clone'... and its mighty fast. Far faster than a subversion copy or
> even a zip file. I'd just
On Tuesday 07 May 2019 08:01:42 pm Chris Hassell wrote:
> I don't allow a script to alter the repo unless it's in big neon.
>
> This is (btw) all placed in github ... so the actual clone is 'git
> clone'... and its mighty fast. Far faster than a subversion copy or
> even a zip file. I'd just
I don't allow a script to alter the repo unless it's in big neon.
This is (btw) all placed in github ... so the actual clone is 'git clone'...
and its mighty fast. Far faster than a subversion copy or even a zip file.
I'd just try the below if you're okay with that. (Where in anywhere is
On Tuesday 07 May 2019 06:27:14 pm Chris Hassell wrote:
> There we go! Debian 9.0 looks good to me.
Who were you? I always do this as amanda, sudo -i (enter pw, become root,
then "su ananda -c "./gh.cf", which builds it as amanda. When its done
with no errors. then I'm still root, and root
There we go! Debian 9.0 looks good to me.
% bash autogen && ./packaging/deb/buildpkg
and then [magic happens]
~/src/amanda #0$0 [..manda:3_5[origin/3_5:+4]]@DEB9$ ls -l *.deb
-rw-r--r-- 1 hassell hassell 1298368 May 7 16:10
amanda-backup-client_3.5.1.git.507ad0ab-1Debian99_amd64.deb
On Monday 06 May 2019 12:14:54 pm Chris Hassell wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm a major advocate for OSS in general here at Zmanda/BETSOL. I'm
> interested in giving a full-voiced support to the community of those
> who know Amanda works well for them. Opinions may vary and projects
> fork for all
+1 ...
On Mon, May 6, 2019 at 1:25 PM Dustin J. Mitchell wrote:
> On Mon, May 6, 2019 at 12:25 PM Chris Hassell
> wrote:
>
>> I'm a major advocate for OSS in general here at Zmanda/BETSOL. I'm
>> interested in giving a full-voiced support to the community of those who
>> know Amanda works well
Hello,
I'm a major advocate for OSS in general here at Zmanda/BETSOL. I'm
interested in giving a full-voiced support to the community of those who
know Amanda works well for them. Opinions may vary and projects fork
for all reasons or no reason (as everyone has a right to) but I hope to
On Monday 25 March 2019 02:40:56 pm Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> Am 20.03.19 um 18:53 schrieb Gene Heskett:
> > The sudden silence from JLM did beg for the question to be asked,
> > and I'm fairly famous for that, so it was mentioned. I hope you are
> > well these days Dustin. I had to have a
> -Original Message-
> From: Stefan G. Weichinger
> So you suggest skipping my try to svn2git here? Does that mean that you will
> come up with new patches etc in github and plan to sync those over to the
> betsol/sourceforge-svn-repo?
[Chris Hassell]
Actually I am using the git-svn
Am 25.03.19 um 22:53 schrieb Chris Hassell:
> Hi all,
>
> Actually here at BETSOL I'm tasked with getting changes from
> github-git converted into SVN commits.
>
> Git at Github should be the main repo AFAIK. It's been a bit quiet
> too long to treat it like the back end of the master-slave.
nal Message-
> From: owner-amanda-hack...@amanda.org hack...@amanda.org> On Behalf Of Chapman Flack
> Sent: Monday, March 25, 2019 3:15 PM
> To: li...@xunil.at; amanda-users@amanda.org
> Cc: Amanda Hackers ; Ashwin Krishna
>
> Subject: Re: if to fork Amanda
>
> On 3/25/19
Am 20.03.19 um 18:53 schrieb Gene Heskett:
> The sudden silence from JLM did beg for the question to be asked, and I'm
> fairly famous for that, so it was mentioned. I hope you are well these
> days Dustin. I had to have a pacemaker installed back in January. I
> guess its a sign of the 84
22 matches
Mail list logo
