Re: [PATCH v1 10/12] sfc: falcon: Make I2C terminology more inclusive

2024-05-07 Thread Easwar Hariharan
On 5/3/2024 3:13 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Tue, 30 Apr 2024 17:38:09 + Easwar Hariharan wrote: >> I2C v7, SMBus 3.2, and I3C 1.1.1 specifications have replaced "master/slave" >> with more appropriate terms. Inspired by and following on to Wolfram's >> series to fix drivers/i2c/[1], fix

Re: [PATCH v1 10/12] sfc: falcon: Make I2C terminology more inclusive

2024-05-03 Thread Jakub Kicinski
On Tue, 30 Apr 2024 17:38:09 + Easwar Hariharan wrote: > I2C v7, SMBus 3.2, and I3C 1.1.1 specifications have replaced "master/slave" > with more appropriate terms. Inspired by and following on to Wolfram's > series to fix drivers/i2c/[1], fix the terminology for users of > I2C_ALGOBIT

[PATCH v1 10/12] sfc: falcon: Make I2C terminology more inclusive

2024-05-01 Thread Easwar Hariharan
I2C v7, SMBus 3.2, and I3C 1.1.1 specifications have replaced "master/slave" with more appropriate terms. Inspired by and following on to Wolfram's series to fix drivers/i2c/[1], fix the terminology for users of I2C_ALGOBIT bitbanging interface, now that the approved verbiage exists in the