Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] drm/amd: Drop unneeded functions to check if s3/s0ix active

Am 08.02.24 um 16:04 schrieb Mario Limonciello: On 2/8/2024 00:54, Christian König wrote: Am 08.02.24 um 06:52 schrieb Mario Limonciello: amdgpu_acpi_is_s0ix_active() and amdgpu_acpi_is_s0ix_active() aren't needed to be checked multiple times in a suspend cycle. Checking and setting up

Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] drm/amd: Drop unneeded functions to check if s3/s0ix active

On 2/8/2024 00:54, Christian König wrote: Am 08.02.24 um 06:52 schrieb Mario Limonciello: amdgpu_acpi_is_s0ix_active() and amdgpu_acpi_is_s0ix_active() aren't needed to be checked multiple times in a suspend cycle.  Checking and setting up policy one time in the prepare() callback is

Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] drm/amd: Drop unneeded functions to check if s3/s0ix active

Am 08.02.24 um 06:52 schrieb Mario Limonciello: amdgpu_acpi_is_s0ix_active() and amdgpu_acpi_is_s0ix_active() aren't needed to be checked multiple times in a suspend cycle. Checking and setting up policy one time in the prepare() callback is sufficient. Mhm, looking at

[PATCH v4 3/3] drm/amd: Drop unneeded functions to check if s3/s0ix active

amdgpu_acpi_is_s0ix_active() and amdgpu_acpi_is_s0ix_active() aren't needed to be checked multiple times in a suspend cycle. Checking and setting up policy one time in the prepare() callback is sufficient. Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello --- v4: New patch ---