Re: 答复: 答复: [PATCH 3/3] amd/amdgpu: seperate sriov fb aperture setting

? > > Best Regards, > Frank > > -邮件原件- > 发件人: Koenig, Christian > 发送时间: 2019年8月19日 15:21 > 收件人: Min, Frank ; amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > 主题: Re: 答复: [PATCH 3/3] amd/amdgpu: seperate sriov fb aperture setting > > Yeah, I thought so. > > In this ca

答复: 答复: [PATCH 3/3] amd/amdgpu: seperate sriov fb aperture setting

人: Koenig, Christian 发送时间: 2019年8月19日 15:21 收件人: Min, Frank ; amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org 主题: Re: 答复: [PATCH 3/3] amd/amdgpu: seperate sriov fb aperture setting Yeah, I thought so. In this case we don't need this patch or is there anything I'm still missing? The use of min/max here is exactly

Re: 答复: [PATCH 3/3] amd/amdgpu: seperate sriov fb aperture setting

Yeah, I thought so. In this case we don't need this patch or is there anything I'm still missing? The use of min/max here is exactly to avoid having a SRIOV dependency here. Regards, Christian. Am 19.08.19 um 09:17 schrieb Min, Frank: > Hi Christian, > Thanks for your review. > For SRIOV,

答复: [PATCH 3/3] amd/amdgpu: seperate sriov fb aperture setting

Hi Christian, Thanks for your review. For SRIOV, amdgpu_gmc_agp_location() would not be called, since it do not use AGP. Also there is no need to use the min and max to judge which range is correct for using. Best Regards, Frank -邮件原件- 发件人: Christian König 发送时间: 2019年8月19日 15:07 收件人: