[Analytics] [Announcement] Daily Social Media Traffic Report for English Wikipedia articles

The WMF Research team has published a new pageview report of inbound traffic coming from Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, and Reddit.[1] The report contains a list of all articles that received at least 500 views from one or more of these platforms (i.e. someone clicked a link on Twitter that sent

Re: [Analytics] [Wiki-research-l] Active meta users v active wikimedia users

gt; > The best solution to this is to have a common table/relation across all > > Wikis and to aggregate from there. I don't think there's any such > > cross-wiki table/relation available. > > > > On Mon, Jan 6, 2020 at 1:38 PM Jonathan Morgan > > wrote: > > &

Re: [Analytics] [Wiki-research-l] Active meta users v active wikimedia users

buting/active-editors/normal|line|2-year|~total|monthly > > Best regards, > Jan Ainali > http://ainali.com > > > Den mån 6 jan. 2020 kl 20:38 skrev Jonathan Morgan >: > >> Same dashboard, but for "All wikis": >> https://stats.wikimedia.org/v2/#/al

Re: [Analytics] [Wiki-research-l] Active meta users v active wikimedia users

Same dashboard, but for "All wikis": https://stats.wikimedia.org/v2/#/all-projects That work? - J On Mon, Jan 6, 2020 at 11:32 AM RhinosF1 - wrote: > Hi, > > That provides active users for meta but not globally. Anything for global? > > RhinosF1 > > On Mon

Re: [Analytics] Active meta users v active wikimedia users

RhinosF1, Are you looking for information like this , or something different? - J On Mon, Jan 6, 2020 at 8:51 AM RhinosF1 - wrote: > Hi, > > Does anyone know a way to find out how many wikimedia users are active > globally compared to

Re: [Analytics] [Wikimedia Research Showcase] June 26, 2019 at 11:30 AM PST, 19:30 UTC

RhinosF1, All talks are recorded and archived on YouTube, so the link below should still work. Let me know if there's a problem with the archiving and I'll see what I can do. I'm also working on getting all slides linked to from the Showcase page on me.org, whenever possible! It was a great

Re: [Analytics] [Wiki-research-l] A new landing page for the Wikimedia Research team

Quick heads up that there's now a Phab tag[1] for the landing page. Please feel free to use this tag to document issues and feature requests. Thanks, Jonathan 1. https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/project/profile/3243/ On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 8:46 AM, Jonathan Morgan <jmor...@wikimedia.org>

Re: [Analytics] [Wiki-research-l] A new landing page for the Wikimedia Research team

Aaron: I'll ask Baha about the issue tracking... *issue* today. The code is hosted on Gerrit now, with a one-way mirror on this GitHub repo[1], which is not ideal from an openness/collaboration POV. For me, enabling easy issue tracking and pull requests is the most pressing issue. In the meantime,

Re: [Analytics] Top editors in a certain namespace across sites?

The recentchanges table only contains edits from the past 30 days. And you can filter by namespace! - J On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 1:55 PM, Andre Klapper wrote: > On Wed, 2017-03-22 at 17:25 -0500, Aaron Halfaker wrote: > > https://quarry.wmflabs.org/query/17556 > > Thanks

Re: [Analytics] Beyond Numbers: Making sense of data. Studies and best Practices.

Hi Jan, A few years ago, the Grants (now Community Engagement) dept. at WMF put together a set of metrics designed to measure the impact of different kinds of grant-funded and/or "programmatic" events and

Re: [Analytics] Monthly page view stats that can now be queried via Pageview API.

Awesome. Thanks Analytics team! - J On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 3:19 AM, Thomas Steiner wrote: > > The Analytics team would like to announce that the Pageview API is able > to > > return monthly pageview stats as of this week. > > Thanks, Nuria and team, very useful addition to

Re: [Analytics] stats.grok.se used in study about Snowden and internet traffic

On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 11:09 AM, Dan Andreescu wrote: > > On a technical note: we should revisit the idea of backfilling old data > into AQS so people can do this type of research project on top of the > pageview API, now that stats.grok is completely down. > I would

Re: [Analytics] Question about data mining of the "Articles for Deletion" queues

+research-l because this is more of a research than an analytics question. Hi Jane, What do you mean by acronyms in deletion queues here? Are you talking about policy links used to justify !votes in deletion discussions, or acronyms used in deletion comments of AfD'd articles? Or something else

Re: [Analytics] [Wikimedia Cascadia] Page views on Cascadia article

Well, at least two of those hits were me :) #cascadianow On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 10:49 PM, Pine W wrote: > Hi WMF Analytics, > > It would be interesting to know where all this traffic is originating. Do > we have a way of tracking back the origin of Wikipedia pageviews to >

Re: [Analytics] [Pageview API] Data Retention Question

My use case: historical data beyond 18 months would be really useful for teaching data science. This spring, I had a bunch of college programming students using the PageView API in combination with the standard MW API in their course research projects. They tracked edits and views to particular

Re: [Analytics] Survey for Wikipedia readers

Hi Vipul, I anticipate that you will have to field additional questions about who you are, the purpose of your research, your methods, and your data collection and usage practices. To anticipate these questions, I strongly suggest that you create a page for your project in our research

Re: [Analytics] Demographics survey

rom 2012, not 2008. - J > > On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 5:18 PM, Tilman Bayer <tba...@wikimedia.org> > wrote: > >> >> >> On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 9:07 AM, Jonathan Morgan <jmor...@wikimedia.org> >> wrote: >> >>> Oh, I thought it was an Enwiki spec

Re: [Analytics] Demographics survey

t is the age of Wikipedia editors? > * What is the educational background of Wikipedia editors? > * What is the relationship status of Wikipedia editors? > * What percentage of Wikipedia editors have children? > > On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 9:44 AM, Jonathan Morgan <jmor...@wikimedia.o

Re: [Analytics] Demographics survey

CC'ing Edward Galvez, our survey specialist. Hi Pete, I support this idea in general, and am always interested in learning more about the demographics of our communities. A few considerations/suggestions (these are opinions: I'm not in a position to launch or kill a project like this). - It

Re: [Analytics] help troubleshooting tunnelling issue

FWIW, I also use Sequel Pro and I am currently able to connect to S1 using the researcher credentials. Here's a screencap of my login. Looks like the only difference is that I'm using stat1003.eqiad.wmnet to tunnel in. Try that? - J [image: Inline image 1] On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 8:39 AM,

Re: [Analytics] [link] Why Big Data Needs Thick Data

Thanks for sharing this, Asaf and Raul. The design research team is (obviously) onboard with this approach. Related: here's a post on doing ethnographic work in a Wikipedia context, written for Medium by veteran Wikiresearcher Heather Ford:

Re: [Analytics] [link] Why Big Data Needs Thick Data

nization, at least, I never feel like I need to use buzzwords in order to get PMs to take me seriously. \o/ J > > -Aaron > > > On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 11:43 AM, Jonathan Morgan <jmor...@wikimedia.org> > wrote: > >> Thanks for sharing this, Asaf and Raul. The de

Re: [Analytics] Echo schema eventlogging

rg> wrote: > >> We could blacklist this schema from the mysql database, and still keep >> producing it. It would be available in Hadoop either way. >> >> >> On Dec 15, 2015, at 12:22, Jonathan Morgan <jmor...@wikimedia.org> wrote: >> >> Hi Nuria

Re: [Analytics] Echo schema eventlogging

Hi Nuria, FWIW: Although I'm not using this right now, but I could see it being useful for understanding the impact of new notification updates that are coming down the pike.[1][2] What are the costs involved in keeping this schema up? Best, J 1.

Re: [Analytics] Does StackExchange have more monthly active users than Wikipedia?

+research Fascinating. Thanks for sharing this, Nemo. And for setting those arrogant Stackers straight ;) For anyone else interested: Nemo was able to answer this question because StackExchange has a Quarry -like public query interface of their own. You should go play

Re: [Analytics] [Spam] Re: User statistics for video marking ENWP 5m article milestone

ytics-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org] *On > Behalf Of *Aaron Halfaker > *Sent:* Tuesday, October 27, 2015 15:48 > *To:* A mailing list for the Analytics Team at WMF and everybody who has > an interest in Wikipedia and analytics. > *Subject:* Re: [Analytics] [Spam] Re: User statistics for

Re: [Analytics] Canonical location for metrics documentation

On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 11:02 AM, Guillaume Paumier wrote: > > What about turning the old pages into redirects to the new pages? That way, > you keep the old content in the history, but the page now points to the > correct information, and you don't break any (internal or

Re: [Analytics] Canonical location for metrics documentation

You are welcome to move the other documentation to the Research namespace on Meta :) On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 8:05 AM, Dan Andreescu wrote: > Strongly oppose moving the Research namespace hosted metrics documentation >> off Meta. It's s'posed to be broadly accessible.

Re: [Analytics] Canonical location for metrics documentation

Strongly oppose moving the Research namespace hosted metrics documentation off Meta. It's s'posed to be broadly accessible. Wikitech is on few peoples' radar. Mediawiki.org is for software documentation. Meta is the central wiki for the movement (however imperfect). - J On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at

Re: [Analytics] [Survey] Pageview API

I would prefer to have both days-in-past and start/end daterange options, along the lines of Adam's proposal. But if I have to choose one, I concur with Leila. Start/end daterange offers more functionality. Jonathan On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 4:44 PM, Oliver Keyes wrote: >

Re: [Analytics] Welcome Joseph

Welcome, Joseph! Glad to have you onboard. Cheers, Jonathan On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 8:57 AM, Aaron Halfaker ahalfa...@wikimedia.org wrote: Glad to have you, sir. On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 10:08 AM, Dan Andreescu dandree...@wikimedia.org wrote: Welcome! On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 10:58 AM,

Re: [Analytics] No information on http://stats.grok.se/

Hi Anthony, Thanks for the ping. We're aware of the problem. Analytics is following up with the (volunteer) maintainer of stats.grok.se now. Hopefully this will be resolved soon, and we'll update this list. Cheers, J On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 7:17 PM, Anthony Oertel t...@frederickbee.com wrote:

Re: [Analytics] data in Vital Signs

+1 We should always be careful about baking assumptions of EnWIki origin into metrics and tools that are intended for use across our projects. - J On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 9:25 PM, Dario Taraborelli dtarabore...@wikimedia.org wrote: to add some context to the present approach, you may remember

Re: [Analytics] Records of article access

Pine, have you considered asking Milowent who they work with on the IP data? I really, really doubt that there is some sort of shady back-alley data dealing going down here. - Jonathan On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 9:52 PM, Pine W wiki.p...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks Toby. I understand that IPs are

Re: [Analytics] pitching the Gender Edit Dashboard

Stepping back... We all seem to agree that user-set gender preference is a problematic measure. We don't trust it. We can come up with plausible hypotheses for why someone would mis-report their gender. And we can be almost certain it's not a representative sample. Do we have any ideas for what

Re: [Analytics] Survey tool for features

On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 12:30 PM, Oliver Keyes oke...@wikimedia.org wrote: Geneally speaking my advice to the multimedia team would be don't go near surveys. I've done a lot of them in the last 3 years, and the one thing I've learned is that surveys are very, very difficult to get right.

Re: [Analytics] Social Machines Event

Whoops... nope, sorry. Just re-checked the dates. I'm traveling that weekend. Bummer. :( Let me know if there's any help or information I can provide ahead of time. Cheers, J On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 10:02 AM, Jonathan Morgan jmor...@wikimedia.orgwrote: Hi Ed, This looks fascinating. I'm