Re: [Analytics] EventLogging blocked by ad blockers

> > In most instances what we look when deriving insights are ratios. For > example: "of the people that saw the red link how many clicked it". In this > scenario, with an adequate sample sizes, insights can be extracted without > any issues. > Yes, I agree that in most cases this doesn't

[Analytics] EventLogging blocked by ad blockers

ble to say that ad blockers should not be blocking EventLogging (since it's just an internal logging system)? 2. If the answer to #1 is "yes", could we change the URL that EventLogging uses so that it is no longer blacklisted by ad blockers? -- *Ryan Kaldari* (they/them) Director

Re: [Analytics] Community health metrics kit: Input needed!

A quick update: I talked to Patrick Earley and he informed me that the Community Health Metrics Kit project was put on ice last year due to lack of resources. On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 4:57 AM Cristian Consonni wrote: > Hi, > > On 25/2/20 18:35, Dan Andreescu wrote: > > In my last meeting with

Re: [Analytics] Community health metrics kit: Input needed!

Anyone else know anything about the fate of the community health metrics kit? The wiki page <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Community_health_initiative/Metrics_kit> still says it's expected to be launched in 2019. On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 1:19 PM Ryan Kaldari wrote: > Hey Joe, &

Re: [Analytics] Community health metrics kit: Input needed!

Hey Joe, whatever happened with this? Is it still being worked on? On Fri, Oct 5, 2018 at 3:29 PM Joe Sutherland wrote: > Hello everyone - apologies for cross-posting! *TL;DR*: We would like your > feedback on our Metrics Kit project. Please have a look and comment on > Meta-Wiki: >

Re: [Analytics] Wikipedia Early Page View Data Set Inquiry

Note that the definition of pageviews has changed several times over the years. Only the data from 2015 to present is strictly comparable. I'm sure some data analysts will chime in with more details. Good luck with your project! > On Jan 15, 2020, at 6:59 PM, Emily Chen wrote: > > Hi, > >

Re: [Analytics] need metric definition clarification

The reason I was > confused and the code does not show an explicit filter for deleted pages is > because we exclude deleted pages from the entire dataset right now. > > On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 12:41 PM Ryan Kaldari > wrote: > >> I need clarification about

[Analytics] need metric definition clarification

I need clarification about whether or not this graph reflects deletions or not. It seems to be unclear:

[Analytics] abnormal traffic to https://en.wikivoyage.org/wiki/Zimbabwe

Since the beginning of February, English Wikivoyage has seen it's daily pageviews double: http://tools.wmflabs.org/siteviews/?platform=all-access=pageviews=user=latest-20=en.wikivoyage.org This seems to be caused by a sustained spike in desktop-only views to the Zimbabwe page. Is this maybe a bot

[Analytics] fishy browser stats

According to... https://analytics.wikimedia.org/dashboards/browsers/#all-sites-by-browser/browser-family-and-major-hierarchical-view ... IE7 accounts for 2.5% of all pageviews in the last month. According to...

Re: [Analytics] Tool to identify the articles versions across Wikipedia language editions?

You can do such queries through the Wikidata Query Service ( https://query.wikidata.org/). For example, if you wanted to get a list of 100 paintings by women that have articles in both the French and English Wikipedias, you would do something like: SELECT DISTINCT ?painting ?paintingLabel ?artist

Re: [Analytics] browser dashboards again!

Very cool! At first I was confused by Ubuntu being the 3rd most popular operating system.[1] But then I realized it was actually iOS, which for some reason is missing from the key. 1. https://analytics.wikimedia.org/dashboards/browsers/#all-sites-by-os On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 12:00 PM, Toby

Re: [Analytics] Pageview analysis graphs not loading

Musikanimal fixed it. > On Jun 23, 2016, at 1:09 AM, Pine W wrote: > > Thanks Toby. > > Pine > >> On Jun 22, 2016 16:02, "Toby Negrin" wrote: >> ok -- I'm getting a spinning wheel of doom where the graphs used to be. I >> suspect there's

Re: [Analytics] Pagecount Datasets to be Deprecated at the end of May

ight, it's just a > matter of changing the url you download from, the rest is meant to be > compatible and we can help if you have questions. > > From: Ryan Kaldari > Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2016 17:27 > To: A mailing list for the Analytics Team at WMF and everybody wh

Re: [Analytics] Demographics survey

ographic statistics on regular English Wikipedia editors?"* > > Either way, I have no objections. Just opinions :) > > Jonathan > > On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 9:00 AM, Ryan Kaldari <rkald...@wikimedia.org> > wrote: > >> This request is not about English Wikipedia; it

Re: [Analytics] Demographics survey

This request is not about English Wikipedia; it's about demographics for Wikipedia editors in general. Apparently, the last time we did a cross-wiki demographic survey was 2008. Let me know if that isn't correct. The specific questions that people would like answers to are: * What is the gender

[Analytics] looking for stats on edit conflicts

The Community Tech team is trying to find out stats about edit conflicts. It looks like there was a patch merged back in January to collect stats on this (https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/266760/2/includes/EditPage.php) but I can't figure out where this is actually collecting the stats at. It

Re: [Analytics] looking for stats on edit conflicts

On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 12:08 PM, Dan Andreescu wrote: > What you're looking at now is the percent of edits that ended in an edit > conflict since last April. > So when it says the average edit conflict rate for VisualEditor on 2015-10-07 was "0.01", does that mean 1%

Re: [Analytics] WikimediaBot convention

Yeah, I don't see anything at [[Manual:Bots]] that mentions a user-agent convention for bots that edit Wikipedia. As far as I know, there isn't any. Most editing bots either use a user-agent string set by the framework they are using or have a completely unique user-agent string. It seems like it

Re: [Analytics] top articles script

Any idea why the most popular article in India is "-"? CCing Dan Garry of Discovery team. On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 5:13 PM, Tilman Bayer wrote: > Below is an example Hive query yielding the 50 most viewed pages in > India during December 2015. It took less than 10 minutes

Re: [Analytics] On toxic communities

I was skeptical of even reading this article, but it actually seems pretty insightful. It also seems more relevant to Wikipedia than I was expecting: "The answer had to be community-wide reform of cultural norms. We had to change how people thought about online society and change their

Re: [Analytics] noccokie tag on X-analytics

I was under the impression that most of the MediaWiki bot frameworks do accept cookies, but I imagine many of the home-made bots don't. Seems like using an unknown useragent string might be a better proxy. On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 1:49 PM, Nuria Ruiz wrote: > >What was the

[Analytics] Data on Wikidata references coverage

Hi, I'm looking to generate some data around what percentage of claims in Wikidata have references. What's the best way for me to get this data? As a bonus, I would like to find out what percentage of claims in Wikidata have references other than XX Wikipedia. Thanks, Kaldari

Re: [Analytics] Virtual file view hack for Media Viewer views

I have to admit that I haven't read all of this rather lengthy thread, but why wouldn't we just track this with EventLogging? That would avoid all the pitfalls of other possible solutions: dealing with caching, creating bogus extra file requests, etc. On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 8:51 AM, Toby Negrin

Re: [Analytics] Beta Labs EventLogging logs

:49 PM, Ryan Kaldari rkald...@wikimedia.org wrote: Looks like I've lost permission to view those logs on Beta Labs again. Any chance you could fix them? Also, was any progress ever made on piping the live cluster errors into a dedicated log with easy access? I know it sounds like it wouldn't

Re: [Analytics] Beta Labs EventLogging logs

server-side EventLogging was failing on en.wiki, but working on Beta Labs and locally. It would also be useful for catching obscure failures that only happen for edge cases. Kaldari On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 1:27 PM, Ryan Kaldari rkald...@wikimedia.org wrote: Ah, sorry, I was looking on the wrong

Re: [Analytics] Only parts of EventLogging events getting written to the database since 2015-01-07 ~1:55

Who is actually maintaining the EventLogging Extension now? As far as I can tell, none of the members of the Analytics-EventLogging project in Phabricator are developers. This makes it hard to know who to ping when there is a problem. For example, this EL bug that I filed a month ago was never

Re: [Analytics] Beta Labs EventLogging logs

eventlogging_processor-server-side-events.log On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 12:57 PM, Ryan Kaldari rkald...@wikimedia.org wrote: It seems the EventLogging logs have disappeared from /var/log/upstart/ on Beta Labs (deployment-bastion). Does anyone know where they are now? Kaldari

Re: [Analytics] WikiGrok and EventLogging

long you keep your experiment running you can try a lower sampling ratio, say, 1/1000 and keep the experiment running for longer. On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 5:50 PM, Ryan Kaldari rkald...@wikimedia.org wrote: The highest volume events we are going to log will be: 1. For each of the 166,000

Re: [Analytics] WikiGrok and EventLogging

I can elaborate on this after I finished the SWAT deployment Gimme 30 minutes or so. On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 4:51 PM, Leila Zia le...@wikimedia.org wrote: Hi, The mobile team is planning to switch WikiGrok on for non-logged in users next week (2014-01-12). The widget will be on on

Re: [Analytics] WikiGrok and EventLogging

of users and it is with that usage the mobile team could estimate the total throughput expected, with this throughput we can recommend sampling ratios. Thanks for asking about this without before deploying! On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 4:55 PM, Ryan Kaldari rkald...@wikimedia.org wrote: I can

Re: [Analytics] EventLogging data QA

I added a comment to the ticket requesting a simple error log for validation errors. I think that would solve about 50% of the problem and should be easy to implement. Kaldari On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 5:58 PM, Leila Zia le...@wikimedia.org wrote: On Monday, December 15, 2014, Kevin Leduc

Re: [Analytics] EventLogging data QA

I filed a bug about the difficultly of debugging Schema failure back in November, but no one ever responded to it: https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T75678 On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 10:06 AM, Toby Negrin tneg...@wikimedia.org wrote: I share Christian's concerns - Dario/Leila - can you comment

Re: [Analytics] [WikimediaMobile] Reportcards

There's a nice directory of the various dashboards and stats pages at https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Statistics. ___ Analytics mailing list Analytics@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics

Re: [Analytics] eventlogging largest tables

Maryana, would it be OK if we delete the MobileWebClickTracking records from before 2014? Would we still need those for any reason? On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 10:32 AM, Maryana Pinchuk mpinc...@wikimedia.org wrote: On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 3:10 PM, Dario Taraborelli dtarabore...@wikimedia.org

Re: [Analytics] pitching the Gender Edit Dashboard

nothing for us to do? Or do we then decide that it is important for us to gather good data so that we can actually know what's going on? -Aaron On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 4:50 AM, Ryan Kaldari rkald...@wikimedia.org wrote: On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 9:53 AM, Leila Zia le...@wikimedia.org wrote

Re: [Analytics] pitching the Gender Edit Dashboard

at least help to control for overall changes in the rate, for example, due to the change in the interface that Steven mentioned. Kaldari On Aug 28, 2014, at 9:50 AM, Ryan Kaldari rkald...@wikimedia.org wrote: We could restrict the query to only look at editors who had explicitly set their gender

Re: [Analytics] pitching the Gender Edit Dashboard

options? - Jonathan On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 10:03 AM, Ryan Kaldari rkald...@wikimedia.org wrote: And because I know someone is going to point this out... Actually, restricting the data to only editors who have explicitly set their gender would not completely control for changes

Re: [Analytics] pitching the Gender Edit Dashboard

On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 9:53 AM, Leila Zia le...@wikimedia.org wrote: 1. We look at the self-reported gender data and do some simple observations. Pros: + we will have an updated view of the gender gap problem. + we may spread seeds for further internal and/or external research about

Re: [Analytics] pitching the Gender Edit Dashboard

On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 4:54 PM, Steven Walling swall...@wikimedia.org wrote: On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 12:21 PM, Ryan Kaldari rkald...@wikimedia.org wrote: You can get accurate information from bad or incomplete data. The issue is not merely that data are incomplete like your tides example

Re: [Analytics] pitching the Gender Edit Dashboard

On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 6:22 PM, Dan Garry dga...@wikimedia.org wrote: Honestly, I disagree with pretty much everything you just said. Even if we assume the bias has remained the same, we still don't understand how it transforms the underlying data, and without that understanding any

Re: [Analytics] response to Magnus' post about page views

open up a world of new feature possibilities, many of which would be useful at promoting editor engagement. I'm sure you have a lot of other concerns to balance with such requests, but just wanted to throw in 2 cents from the mobile team. Cheers, Ryan Kaldari On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 3:14 PM, Toby