Re: [ansible-project] Using include_vars and with_items with optiona files == bug?

2017-07-10 Thread Brian Coca
Well, this is not include_vars behaviour but 'merge loop results behaviour' that affects all modules as this is result processing. The other part of 'saving intermediate results' would also affect all tasks. I doubt either will change in the future. -- Brian Coca -- You received this

Re: [ansible-project] Using include_vars and with_items with optiona files == bug?

2017-07-10 Thread Dan Linder
I'm falling back to the six tasks for now (three stat file, three include when exists). In my mind this is a bug; the "ignore_errors" setting should let it keep the partial result. The parallel being that the file module could partially succeed in setting a file owner but SELinux or other

Re: [ansible-project] Using include_vars and with_items with optiona files == bug?

2017-07-10 Thread Brian Coca
The merge setting will affect the result of the task, but not the internal iterator of the task. You might want to make this 3 tasks or use vars_files. -- -- Brian Coca -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ansible Project" group. To

Re: [ansible-project] Using include_vars and with_items with optiona files == bug?

2017-07-10 Thread Dan Linder
I forgot to add that I've defined the hash_behaviour to "merge" just for this express purpose of keeping and stacking/appending variables so the normal behavior is suppose to be modified here. On Monday, July 10, 2017 at 2:59:22 PM UTC-5, Brian Coca wrote: > > Well, when you include_vars you

Re: [ansible-project] Using include_vars and with_items with optiona files == bug?

2017-07-10 Thread Brian Coca
Well, when you include_vars you are normally overwriting existing vars, this will happen in a with_ loop or outside of it, that is normal behaviour. As for the error wiping out myvars ... the task failed, so none of the work was done. The previously accumulated data in the 2 files that did work

[ansible-project] Using include_vars and with_items with optiona files == bug?

2017-07-10 Thread Dan Linder
I'm trying to setup a hierarchical set of variable files so that different teams can setup value, permitting more specific instances to override generic ones. The key is that the more specific instances may not be defined in all cases. I thought I solved it with a combination of