[Aptitude-devel] Bug#451137: Tagging bugs fixed in Git.

2012-02-11 Thread Daniel Hartwig
tags 451137 + pending tags 476399 + pending thanks #451137 aptitude update succeeds despite hash sum mismatch, etc. #476399 [aptitude] aptitude ignores APT::Update options These bugs are fixed in latest Git HEAD: commit bd3f0ed4935577f5d942b418f11c0a8a50894c7b Author: Daniel Hartwig

[Aptitude-devel] Processed: Tagging bugs fixed in Git.

2012-02-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 451137 + pending Bug #451137 [aptitude] aptitude update succeeds despite hash sum mismatch, etc. Bug #457372 [aptitude] aptitude: fails with code 255 without outputting any E: Error description line, and without stopping Bug #563887

[Aptitude-devel] Bug#468186: marked as done (aptitude: There are now 1 update [-12].)

2012-02-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 11 Feb 2012 18:25:35 +0800 with message-id CAN3veRc6ojzeKonP=1AOD=NMVf0Czvq2de=fysg87h9vttu...@mail.gmail.com and subject line Bug#468186: aptitude: plural forms in update status has caused the Debian Bug report #468186, regarding aptitude: There are now 1 update [-12]. to

[Aptitude-devel] Bug#457946: marked as done (aptitude: Incorrect plural in commandline status)

2012-02-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 11 Feb 2012 18:25:35 +0800 with message-id CAN3veRc6ojzeKonP=1AOD=NMVf0Czvq2de=fysg87h9vttu...@mail.gmail.com and subject line Bug#468186: aptitude: plural forms in update status has caused the Debian Bug report #468186, regarding aptitude: Incorrect plural in commandline

[Aptitude-devel] Bug#458005: marked as done (bad grammar in output in new update-counting thingie)

2012-02-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 11 Feb 2012 18:25:35 +0800 with message-id CAN3veRc6ojzeKonP=1AOD=NMVf0Czvq2de=fysg87h9vttu...@mail.gmail.com and subject line Bug#468186: aptitude: plural forms in update status has caused the Debian Bug report #468186, regarding bad grammar in output in new

[Aptitude-devel] [PATCH] Only check for VTE when building the GTK+ frontend

2012-02-11 Thread Sven Joachim
The VTE library is not needed in the curses fontend, do not fail to configure if it is unavailable and GTK+ is disabled. --- configure.ac |4 ++-- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac index 7504ba4..33e4201 100644 --- a/configure.ac +++

[Aptitude-devel] Bug#659479: aptitude: Too chatty even with --quiet=9

2012-02-11 Thread Toby Speight
Package: aptitude Version: 0.6.4-1.2 Severity: minor Aptitude is an awesome tool, but one thing that annoys me is a bunch of progress messages that can't be eliminated even at the highest 'quiet' setting: / | # aptitude -q9 update | Reading package lists... | Building dependency tree...

Re: [Aptitude-devel] [PATCH] Only check for VTE when building the GTK+ frontend

2012-02-11 Thread Daniel Hartwig
On 11 February 2012 19:56, Sven Joachim svenj...@gmx.de wrote: The VTE library is not needed in the curses fontend, do not fail to configure if it is unavailable and GTK+ is disabled. Thanks, your patch is applied. ___ Aptitude-devel mailing list

[Aptitude-devel] Bug#659479: aptitude: Too chatty even with --quiet=9

2012-02-11 Thread Daniel Hartwig
severity 569516 minor merge 569516 659479 tags 569516 + patch pending thanks On 11 February 2012 20:40, Toby Speight t.m.speight...@cantab.net wrote: Package: aptitude Version: 0.6.4-1.2 Severity: minor Aptitude is an awesome tool, but one thing that annoys me is a bunch of progress

[Aptitude-devel] Processed: Tagging bug fixed in Git.

2012-02-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 653479 + pending Bug #653479 [aptitude] aptitude: does not hold lock for duration of update Added tag(s) pending. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 653479:

[Aptitude-devel] Bug#608786: priority cost level is broken which makes it basically useless

2012-02-11 Thread Daniel Hartwig
tags 608786 + pending thanks Modestas Vainius mo...@debian.org wrote: while documentation [1] says the following: priority Level A value that increases as the apt pin priority of a version decreases. Specifically, this is computed by negating the pin

[Aptitude-devel] Processed: Re: Bug#608786: priority cost level is broken which makes it basically useless

2012-02-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 608786 + pending Bug #608786 [aptitude] priority cost level is broken which makes it basically useless Added tag(s) pending. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 608786: