Re: [aqm] status of codel WGLC

That sounds good to me. On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 10:05 AM, Wesley Eddy wrote: > In my opinion, point 1 would be a research topic to mention in section 9 > (or other suitable place). Since we want to encourage wide > experimentation, it's a good idea to be explicit about

[aqm] aqm - Not having a session at IETF 97

Wesley Eddy, a chair of the aqm working group, indicated that the aqm working group does not plan to hold a session at IETF 97. This message was generated and sent by the IETF Meeting Session Request Tool. ___ aqm mailing list aqm@ietf.org

Re: [aqm] status of codel WGLC

In my opinion, point 1 would be a research topic to mention in section 9 (or other suitable place). Since we want to encourage wide experimentation, it's a good idea to be explicit about what some of the open questions/topics are. On 9/29/2016 12:29 PM, Jana Iyengar wrote: Hi Wes, Roland,