Thanks for getting back with comments.
On 18/03/2015 00:38, Greg Skinner wrote:
I noticed that the RFC 2119 boilerplate text (Key words for use in RFCs
to Indicate Requirement Levels such as MUST) is missing. IMO, several
issues in Section 6 (and possibly Section 7) should have the
On 3/11/2015 4:10 PM, go...@erg.abdn.ac.uk wrote:
Alas, due to a slight technical mistake by me, we missed the ID deadline.
So I have posted an interim version here:
http://www.erg.abdn.ac.uk/users/gorry/ietf/AQM/draft-ietf-aqm-ecn-benefits-01.txt
On 17/03/2015 15:11, Wesley Eddy wrote:
On 3/11/2015 4:10 PM, go...@erg.abdn.ac.uk wrote:
Alas, due to a slight technical mistake by me, we missed the ID deadline.
So I have posted an interim version here:
http://www.erg.abdn.ac.uk/users/gorry/ietf/AQM/draft-ietf-aqm-ecn-benefits-01.txt
AQM'ers,
Michael and I have a new version of the WG draft motivating use of ECN.
This version seeks to produce a readable and near-complete version that
should be ready for review comments. Please let us know what you think via
the AQM list, all comments appreciated.
Alas, due to a slight
