On 5/7/2015 5:39 PM, Dave Taht wrote: > On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 2:31 PM, Michael Welzl <mich...@ifi.uio.no> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> >>> On 7. mai 2015, at 22.40, Dave Taht <dave.t...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> I see that during my absence here most mention of the potential >>> negative aspects of ecn >>> have been nuked from this document. >> >> Actually I don't think we really removed any - it's just a stylistic change >> (title, headlines). So: could you be specific about which one there is in a >> (which?) previous version that is missing in this one? > > You are correct. I should have said that few of the negatives I had > attempted to discuss previously were added to the document. >
Hi Dave, I'm trying as a co-chair to figure out if we have consensus on this document to go forward. If it's easy to point to, or summarize, a list of negatives that haven't yet been included, I think that would make it simpler for the editors to incorporate. I wasn't able to go back and track every message, but the things that have been most discussed do seem to be included currently. If there are some still missing, I'd like to make sure they get discussed and incorporated as needed. There was the topic of "gaming ECN", which I thought Bob Briscoe's message on 4/15/2015 came close to putting to rest, and personally, I'm not sure if or how to reflect this conversation in the draft, but maybe others have more clear ideas? -- Wes Eddy MTI Systems _______________________________________________ aqm mailing list aqm@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm
