Re: [aqm] working group last call on CoDel drafts

2015-12-04 Thread Dave Taht
In just about every benchmark we have created to date, the linux version of the codel implementation wins over dozens of attempted alternatives. We have one that is mildly better at a 10ms RTT, but not as good at 80ms, but that's it. This doesn't mean that more experimentation isn't called for

Re: [aqm] working group last call on CoDel drafts

2015-12-04 Thread Bless, Roland (TM)
Dear all, we believe that the Codel specification https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-aqm-codel/ needs at least one major clarification. The following lines are present in the draft's pseudo-code, but are not explained further anywhere in the document text, and moreover differ from the

[aqm] working group last call on CoDel drafts

2015-12-02 Thread Wesley Eddy
This message is to start a working group last call on the CoDel and FQ-CoDel documents: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-aqm-codel/ and: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-aqm-fq-codel/ Please provide any comments you might be saving up on these by the end of December.