In just about every benchmark we have created to date, the linux
version of the codel implementation wins over dozens of attempted
alternatives. We have one that is mildly better at a 10ms RTT, but not
as good at 80ms, but that's it.
This doesn't mean that more experimentation isn't called for
Dear all,
we believe that the Codel specification
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-aqm-codel/ needs at least
one major clarification.
The following lines are present in the draft's pseudo-code, but are not
explained further anywhere in the document text, and moreover differ
from the
This message is to start a working group last call on the CoDel and
FQ-CoDel documents:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-aqm-codel/
and:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-aqm-fq-codel/
Please provide any comments you might be saving up on these by the end
of December.