Re: [arch-general] latest kernel update surprise

On Sunday, March 22, 2020 2:28:13 PM CET Piscium via arch-general wrote: > Before Arch I used Fedora for 7 years. I found Fedora far more stable > than Arch when upgrading to a new Fedora version 3 months after > release when most bugs have been fixed. With Arch there is always > something that

Re: [arch-general] External monitors are no longer detected (Intel graphics)

On Wednesday, July 3, 2019 2:59:01 PM CEST Genes Lists via arch-general wrote: > On 7/3/19 3:58 AM, Bennett Piater wrote: > > To clarify: I did not find an upstream bug, and I don't know that this > > is an upstream issue. > > It is an upstream bug - peraps my previous ema

Re: [arch-general] External monitors are no longer detected (Intel graphics)

On 2019-07-03 10:24, Ralf Mardorf via arch-general wrote: Hi, since I didn't follow this thread close enough, I don't know if this is an Arch or upstream related issue. However, it's crass if you consider it to be most likely an upstream bug and you think somebody else should do your job.

Re: [arch-general] External monitors are no longer detected (Intel graphics)

On 2019-07-03 09:51, Ralf Mardorf via arch-general wrote: On Wed, 03 Jul 2019 09:25:46 +0200, Bennett Piater wrote: I opened an Arch bug so we can track it: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/63079 The maintainers can report it further upstream, they know where - that's what

Re: [arch-general] External monitors are no longer detected (Intel graphics)

On 2019-07-03 06:38, Oliver Jaksch via arch-general wrote: Glad that this (4.19 in your case) works for you, too. Good idea in general. But where? Seems that this is Intels' thing again and their list of open bugs is already extensive :( I opened an Arch bug so we can track it:

Re: [arch-general] External monitors are no longer detected (Intel graphics)

On Tuesday, July 2, 2019 9:59:57 AM CEST Oliver Jaksch via arch-general wrote: > There are *some* issues with intel gpu's and recent kernels. I can't use > multiple monitors in most of the cases as the i915 module misinterpret > possible resolutions, for example. > >

Re: [arch-general] External monitors are no longer detected (Intel graphics)

Have you checked the troubleshooting options on https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Intel_graphics. I also recall an intel issue with recent kernels, but can't put my hand on a link. The problems experienced with some are listed in the wiki. There are *some* issues with intel gpu's and

[arch-general] External monitors are no longer detected (Intel graphics)

Hi, I'm using a Thinkpad T450s with Intel graphics. Yesterday, I could no longer connect external monitors via miniDP. They were not detected at all, either by xrandr in i3 or by sway (wayland). I didn't have time to dig out a VGA cable and try that, so I cannot rule out physical damage yet -

Re: [arch-general] How long do you make the passphrase for the private key?

On 2019-06-25 12:11, Ralf Mardorf via arch-general wrote: Six words are just six words out of an assessable vocabulary. "This level of unpredictability assumes that a potential attacker knows that Diceware has been used to generate the passphrase, knows the particular word list used, and

Re: [arch-general] How long do you make the passphrase for the private key?

On 2019-06-25 11:09, Ralf Mardorf via arch-general wrote: On Tue, 25 Jun 2019 09:35:53 +0100, Ralph Corderoy wrote: Are you familiar with https://xkcd.com/936/ ? Too funny, that is the method I described and while I was writing my email, you posted that cartoon. However, even this suffers

Re: [arch-general] Arch Linux USB stick won't boot

On Saturday, March 23, 2019 6:05:59 AM CET David C. Rankin wrote: > In the past there was a wonderful "Beginner's Guide" with detailed a > detailed install procedure with expanded explanations for each step. When > the arch installer went away, it was removed shortly thereafter. It would > be

Re: [arch-general] Why is permission for /run/user/1000/gvfs denied for root?

>Perhaps there is something provided by >e.g. KDE, that allows to access an Android filesystem. I recommend Dolphin - or KDEConnect, which works outside of KDE. -- GPG fingerprint: 871F 1047 7DB3 DDED 5FC4 47B2 26C7 E577 EF96 7808

Re: [arch-general] Aur git - missing .SRCINFO hook declined to update refs/heads/master - help?

On 06/04/2018 12:41 PM, David C. Rankin wrote: > That is the tarball generated by: > > $ makepkg --printsrcinfo > .SRCINFO > $ makepkg -S --sign -f > > That results in the two untracked files: > > console-blanking-0.0.1-4.src.tar.gz > console-blanking-0.0.1-4.src.tar.gz.sig > > The

Re: [arch-general] Aur git - missing .SRCINFO hook declined to update refs/heads/master - help?

On 06/04/2018 11:39 AM, David C. Rankin wrote: > On 06/04/2018 04:30 AM, Bennett Piater wrote: >> This is a different error, is it not? >> Does your most recent commit contain the LICENSE file, or did you only >> add PKGBUILD and .SRCINFO? > > Oh, it's there... >

Re: [arch-general] Aur git - missing .SRCINFO hook declined to update refs/heads/master - help?

On 06/04/2018 11:27 AM, David C. Rankin wrote: > Well I tried without `-a` and no changes to .SRCINFO or PKGBUILD were > incorporated. Did you add the files before committing? > remote: error: missing source file: LICENSE This is a different error, is it not? Does your most recent commit

Re: [arch-general] Aur git - missing .SRCINFO hook declined to update refs/heads/master - help?

On 06/04/2018 10:49 AM, Tinu Weber wrote: >> $ git commit -am "console-blanking-0.0.1-2" >> > On Mon, Jun 04, 2018 at 03:38:08 -0500, David C. Rankin wrote: > > It appears you've committed also the built package files into the repo.> never git commit -a. always manually track files using git

Re: [arch-general] How to access mythes or other thesaurus from the commandline?

On 05/19/2018 10:40 AM, Jens John wrote: > On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 11:39:05PM +0200, Jeanette C. via arch-general > wrote: > > You may want to use something like > >  tell ()  { dict "$@" | colorit | less -R >  } > > to get a coloured output, which is much more practical for long result

Re: [arch-general] Interesting Dual Boot Problems

On 04/10/2018 12:44 PM, Hunter Jozwiak via arch-general wrote: > I do not have a spare laptop or network card. Everything was working > perfectly fine before I installed Windows, so I have no idea what is > going on here. Interesting. Maybe windows turned something off? Broken power saving

Re: [arch-general] Interesting Dual Boot Problems

On 04/10/2018 12:10 PM, morganamilo via arch-general wrote: > > > On 10/04/18 10:45, Hunter Jozwiak via arch-general wrote: > Campus wifi is usually wpa enterprise which I've always had trouble > with. I don't know how installing windows could cause this or how to fix > this but I would

Re: [arch-general] Virtualbox under KDE plasma

On 02/13/2018 06:13 AM, Shridhar Daithankar wrote: > On Tuesday 13 February 2018 8:33:09 AM IST you wrote: > > kde plasma wayland to be specific :( It all works under kde plasma Xorg. Yes, do definitely file a bug upstream. Also, plasma wayland is still considered experimental, so don't expect

Re: [arch-general] Tips for a stable GNOME Shell?

On 02/06/2018 11:08 PM, Giovanni Santini via arch-general wrote: > Good evening, > I am writing here since I do believe people here might have found > solutions already to my problems. > > Sadly, I am the problem, as I love GNOME Shell (ops). > Jokes aside, I love its interface and behaviour;

Re: [arch-general] AUR and missing/unidentifiable GPG keys

> Quick tip or link of a howto? It's been ages since I set anything up > with GPG and co. cat ~/.gnupg/gpg.conf: [...] # auto-key-retrieve : automatically fetch keys as needed from the keyserver when verifying signatures or when importing keys that have been revoked by a revocation key that is

Re: [arch-general] AUR and missing/unidentifiable GPG keys

> I know this can be circumvented by editing the pkgbuild file and > removing the verification option, but that feels wrong. Is there a > systematic way to update the relevant keys? You are supposed to manually download the keys, ideally from a trusted source. Another option would be to

Re: [arch-general] How to build nvidia driver?

> > Where can I get this "downgrade" command? > I don't want to put any words in Ralf's mouth, but I don't know of any other > way to do it :) There is a downgrade package in AUR which does that automatically :)

Re: [arch-general] Why there is no NetworkManager in ArchISO

On July 24, 2017 9:36:39 AM GMT+02:00, Junayeed Ahnaf via arch-general wrote: >All fine and good but I don't see arch being installed on something >other than desktop/laptop. Of course there are niche cases as arch >server I do not doubt but how much of arch

Re: [arch-general] Kde + Gnome dual-install issues

On 06/27/2017 04:15 PM, Francesco Porro via arch-general wrote: > > I'm having another trouble, but this time is about QT-apps looks on > Gnome, so maybe it's better discussing to a new mail-thread. I assume you mean that QT5 apps don't use any theme? There are several ways to fix that, you can

Re: [arch-general] Mount point of MTP devices?

On April 2, 2017 7:06:59 AM GMT+02:00, Rijul Gulati via arch-general wrote: >Hello, >I have recently installed Arch on my desktop machine (KDE). >I want to access android device (MTP) from terminal. The device is >accessible from file manager (Dolphin). This means

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] AUR ToS (aka making AUR user names public)

Reply-To is not what you are supposed to look into; look at In-Reply-To! On 03/07/2017 11:06 AM, fnodeuser wrote: > test > -- GPG fingerprint: 871F 1047 7DB3 DDED 5FC4 47B2 26C7 E577 EF96 7808 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] AUR ToS (aka making AUR user names public)

On 03/06/2017 10:03 AM, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > I did not wrote about the NSA. I only pointed out that even the NSA > doesn't get all the data as a gift. Why should a researcher get such > data as a gift? You are seemingly already that used to data mining and > offended privacy, that it's good and

Re: [arch-general] Why isn't SELinux officially supported?

Have a look at aurutils :) On 03/01/2017 05:45 PM, Robert Wong via arch-general wrote: > But I'm not meaning disappealing, I just felt uncomfortable when I > see the packages from the AUR can't be updated by the pacman and I > don' feel like using yaourt... Probably it's my obsessive compulsive >

Re: [arch-general] sandboxing

On 02/02/2017 07:28 PM, Leonid Isaev wrote: > I already described an approach when one always runs browsers, pdf readers, > etc, inside an lxc container, as an unprivileged user. That container resides > on a filesystem mounted with nosuid (so things like ping, su, sudo won't > work), > and has a

Re: [arch-general] Getting freeze on early start with linux 4.9-1 kernel.

On 12/23/2016 03:17 PM, Mauro Santos via arch-general wrote: > There is an LTS kernel in the repos, which you > can have installed exactly for things like this. Exactly. I never actually needed it, but I have linux-lts installed and configured in systemd-boot for cases like this. Keeping old

Re: [arch-general] Why was wpa_supplicant.conf renamed wpa_supplicant.conf.pacsav??

> Other than that, I don't like gentoo's way of dealing with this > problems other than the fact they ship tooling to actually deal with > the 3-way merge pacman expects from the user. I'd welcome suggestions > on this and actually was not smart enough up to now to somehow have a > script dig up

Re: [arch-general] Stronger Hashes for PKGBUILDs

>> Is there any voting system that we have so that we can also >> democratically vote for stronger hashes? > > The Arch developers decide this, not a democratically vote ;). Arch is not a democracy, that has been said many times. -- GPG fingerprint: 871F 1047 7DB3 DDED 5FC4 47B2 26C7 E577 EF96

Re: [arch-general] Stronger Hashes for PKGBUILDs

> You are partly right. For a checksum CRC would be best. Fast and > simple, as its meant as checksum, not as a hash. You misunderstand something. Every checksum is also a hash (a mapping to another domain), and cryptographic hash functions always produce checksums. > So possibly we should get

Re: [arch-general] Stronger Hashes for PKGBUILDs

On 12/07/2016 11:17 AM, Gregory Mullen wrote: > If the argument left is, I don't want (better checksum) because it's > shouldn't be thought of as a security check, and I want a security check. > > Why can't the requirement be PGP sig's are now required, and we drop the > checksum completely?

Re: [arch-general] Stronger Hashes for PKGBUILDs

> In fact, I am making CRC the default. I assume this to be sarcasm. In any case, this may not be a good idea because the younglings will have never heard about it and don't know how insecure it is ;) Cheers, Bennett -- GPG fingerprint: 871F 1047 7DB3 DDED 5FC4 47B2 26C7 E577 EF96 7808

Re: [arch-general] After upgrade

> It was in the news today. At CERN by accident a black hole was > produced. It expands, Switzerland already is lost, now the black hole > eats words from emails, since it has got impact on German Internet > nodes. If we don't stop replying, the black hole will grow by eating > word by word and

Re: [arch-general] After upgrade

I prever ancient greek, so here you go: τῇ καλλίστῃ :) I knew it would pay of to learn that :D Cheers, Bennett On 12/02/2016 06:53 PM, Martin Kühne via arch-general wrote: > Wait a minute, wait a minute. > I just realized some crucial aspect of your fnord. > You stripped the context yourself,

Re: [arch-general] On containers. WAS: Re: snapcraft.io ...

> Another very useful case would be using containers as a chroot replacement > for having clean (only what's in the recipe), reproducable build environments > for building arch packages. It would also allow installing makedeps only in > the container/chroot or make cross-compilation easier to

Re: [arch-general] snapcraft.io IMO gets across the message that snaps are appropriate for Arch Linux

> o...@ubuntu.com is deeply involved in working on snappy. > ^^ > ^^ > > Date: Sun, 09 Oct 2016 14:40:32 +0200 > Subject: Re: Question about Snaps > To: ubuntu-us...@lists.ubuntu.com > From: o...@ubuntu.com > > [snip] > > snaps are the future in the ubuntu

Re: [arch-general] Does LTS package really not fit to Rolling Release model and Arch Philosophy?

> Ralf, exactly, and that is to what I'm attracted. That they maintain it doesn't necessarily mean that they will also make sure that it works with new library versions. It sounded more like bug- and security fixes to me. Arch is not like Debian or even Ubuntu. Most libraries get updated as soon

Re: [arch-general] ensuring integrity of sources (was: [arch-dev-public] todo list for moving http -> https sources)

On 11/01/2016 12:40 AM, Allan McRae wrote: > I would like some bourbon. > > Allan I like your sense of humor :) > > * It might appear unrelated, but I can spend time on pacman/makepkg if I > don't have to work for bourbon. Then again, bourbon reduces the quality > of my coding after a

Re: [arch-general] ensuring integrity of sources (was: [arch-dev-public] todo list for moving http -> https sources)

> Any PKGBUILD kept in git can already optionally have this feature. See > git-commit(1), specifically, its --gpg-sign option. I know that, I have [commit] gpgsign = true in my ~/.gitconfig. It would be nice if more people did that and if makepkg checked that, though. It would

Re: [arch-general] ensuring integrity of sources (was: [arch-dev-public] todo list for moving http -> https sources)

On 10/31/2016 06:04 PM, Levente Polyak wrote: > On the other side we have a dev/TU authenticating the buildscript. > Both cover certain areas but are still independent and one does not make > the other futile. Since this thread is helpfully on arch-general now, I want to quickly chime in and say

Re: [arch-general] Unlocking the screen through fprintd

> Not using fprint, but merely an idea (you have possibly already checked > that): maybe the PAM-file for the screenlocker has a higher priority for > passwords than for the fingerprint sensor while the rest has it the > other way around. > > iirc this depends on the ordering of the corresponding

Re: [arch-general] Unlocking the screen through fprintd

> Unfortunately I can't help you, I'm just curious. Well, you did anyway! > If you type no password at all, just push enter, does the fingerprint > check allow you to unlock the screen? Or doesn't it appear, if you just > push enter without typing a password? I tested it with kscreenlocker and

[arch-general] Unlocking the screen through fprintd

Hi all, I have been trying to get fprint working properly with screen lockers for months and have yet to find a working solution. I am using i3wm without DM. Login on the TTY and sudo work properly: They ask me to swipe the finger and then ask for my password if that didn't work. However, every

Re: [arch-general] arch-audit: pkg-audit-like tool for Arch Linux

On 09/24/2016 11:59 AM, Andrea Scarpino wrote: > Hi everybody, > > I'm happy to announce my tiny project named arch-audit[1]. > > It parses the CVE wiki page[2] and reports which packages on your system are > affected by a vulnerability and if a fixed version for that package is > already >

Re: [arch-general] i3wm (randomly?) freezes; SIGCONT seems to fix it

Oh, that looks promising. I'll read through those issues tomorrow. Thank you! :) Cheers, Bennett On 09/11/2016 09:08 PM, Martin Kühne via arch-general wrote: > Oh, this stuff might all be related to the issue: [0], [1], [2] > > cheers! > mar77i > > [0] >

Re: [arch-general] i3wm (randomly?) freezes; SIGCONT seems to fix it

> No freeze since the one I told you about! I will definitely > investigate further if/when I get a new one. Very weird... I had another one yesterday, but again, no clue what caused it. $(killall -CONT i3) fixed it again, so be sure to try that if you get another freeze :) Sadly, the logs

Re: [arch-general] i3wm (randomly?) freezes; SIGCONT seems to fix it

> Comparing your pacman.log with mine (mine taken from 2016-08-23 to > 2016-09-05), here is the list of common packages we both have either > installed or upgraded: > > - man-db > - mariadb > - mariadb-clients > - mediainfo > - nano > - networkmanager > - openvpn > - pacman-mirrorlist > -

Re: [arch-general] i3wm (randomly?) freezes; SIGCONT seems to fix it

> .xsession-errors contains the output of every GUI app you are running, > as if you would launch all those apps in terminals. That's good to know, thank you :) I'm very curious as to what I will (or won't) find next time the freeze happens. It hasn't happened this boot, ever since I sent

Re: [arch-general] i3wm (randomly?) freezes; SIGCONT seems to fix it

> Regarding > > https://www.google.de/?gws_rd=ssl#q=+linux+no+.xsession-errors > https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=143068 > http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/slackware-14/where-is-~-xsession-errors-log-867498/ > > $ startx 2> ~/.xsession-errors > > should do the job. Thank you,

Re: [arch-general] i3wm (randomly?) freezes; SIGCONT seems to fix it

I do not have that file. Cheers, Bennett On 09/09/2016 05:17 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > On Fri, 9 Sep 2016 16:11:48 +0200, Bennett Piater wrote: >> I've had a very elusive and frustrating problem this week and don't >> know where to look anymore. > > Where did you alread

Re: [arch-general] i3wm (randomly?) freezes; SIGCONT seems to fix it

> (I think I managed to trace them back to Sept 1st and Sept 5th). My last update before the apparently breaking one was 2016-08-24. So, maybe some upgrade between 2016-08-24 and 2016-09-04 doesn't play well with i3... Would you mind cross-checking your upgrades between 2016-08-24 and 2016-09-01

[arch-general] i3wm (randomly?) freezes; SIGCONT seems to fix it

Hi all, I've had a very elusive and frustrating problem this week and don't know where to look anymore. Maybe one of you has an idea? :) Since 2016-09-04, i3wm freezes every once and a while; often after waking the screen (even if it wasn't locked), a few times also directly or a few minutes

Re: [arch-general] Announcing pacpak

On 08/06/2016 03:40 PM, pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) wrote: > Thank you. I now tend towards pacbub; bubblepac seems too long. pacbub > is similar to pacman and pacpak. It is also a pun on pacman because in > German “der bub” is “the boy”. I like that too :) Cheers, Bennett -- GPG fingerprint:

Re: [arch-general] Pacman doesn't optionally require fakeroot

> fakeroot is part of core, > https://www.archlinux.org/packages/core/x86_64/fakeroot/ . Oh, I completely missed that. Thanks, that makes perfect sense :) Cheers, Bennett -- GPG fingerprint: 871F 1047 7DB3 DDED 5FC4 47B2 26C7 E577 EF96 7808 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital

[arch-general] Pacman doesn't optionally require fakeroot

Hi, I have a quick question. Makepkg, which is provided by pacman, doesn't work without fakeroot. Is there a reason why pacman doesnt opdep on it? Cheers, Bennett -- GPG fingerprint: 871F 1047 7DB3 DDED 5FC4 47B2 26C7 E577 EF96 7808 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [arch-general] Announcing pacpak

On 07/10/2016 02:18 PM, pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) wrote: > The intention is that, once implemented, `pacpak -Syu` or maybe `pacpak > -Su` will install a current version of all apps and runtimes. Old > versions of apps and app runtimes that are not used by any app could be > cleaned by `pacpak

Re: [arch-general] Announcing pacpak

> A specter is haunting the GNU/Linux ecosystem: the specter of per-user > containerization. Software like Flatpak and Snappy promise fully > sandboxed GNU/Linux application bundles (instead of merely launching an > application with fewer privileges but without hiding the operating > system, like

Re: [arch-general] Mailing list etiquette

> Unsubscribe To unsubscribe, use the request address instead of the main one. -- GPG fingerprint: 871F 1047 7DB3 DDED 5FC4 47B2 26C7 E577 EF96 7808 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [arch-general] GTK2 GUIs became a PITA after upgrade

> It's a PITA that even users who don't use GNOME, KDE or similar crap > nowadays get broken environments, because even apps that are not from a > bloatware DE break. FWIW, I'm using a lot of KDE apps in i3WM and don't have any problems. I have the GTK problems of course, but all my QT things

Re: [arch-general] Win 10 Dual boot nightmare

On 03/15/2016 06:26 PM, Zachary Kline wrote: > Hi Murari, > > Thank you for this suggestion. It seems to have worked as expected. My laptop > defaults to Arch, but I can boot Windows with the second entry. > I hope I remember to upgrade the renamed image when systems-boot changes. I > don’t

Re: [arch-general] Ksnapshots not work

Ksnapshot doesn't exist anymore. It was replaced by spectacle. Did you read the logs after the upgrade? On 02/16/2016 03:16 PM, Maykel Franco wrote: > Hi, after update archlinux system, ksnapshot not work fine... Te key impr > pet sys not work... > > Anybody with the same problem? > -- GPG

[arch-general] Is Linux 4.3 stable?

Hi everyone, I just saw that 4.3.3-2 hit stable. There are still open bugs, one of them critical, about the 4.3 series on the bug tracker. I heard of a lot of issues around this kernel on the dev-public mailing list. Does anyone have problems with this update? Also, does anyone have problems

Re: [arch-general] Is Linux 4.3 stable?

> Where ? I couldn’t find any. The only critical bug I was aware of is > about old Intel GFX, but it has been solved in 4.3.3-2. Simple, maybe naive search [0]. But you are right, I misread - there is no critical bug left. > No problem here, with HD4600 on one and 945GM on another one. ;)

Re: [arch-general] [OT?] Which is most future-proof desktop environment?

I'm another extremely satisfied i3wm user. Dmenu is amazing, and everything about i3 is so clean. The config file syntax, the design principles, the container system, the looks... I use ranger as a (text-mode) file manager and dolphin when I want a graphical one. Gwenview as image viewer. I tend

Re: [arch-general] Dropping Plasma 4

> I believe you can find extra icons either in the repos or in the AUR. If > nothing else, then you can also try http://kde-look.org/ He was talking about *system tray* icons. A lot of "generic" system tray things didn't show up in Plasma 5 because they changed to a new spec and completely

[arch-general] netctl-auto and netctl refuse to work (probably due to wpa_supplicant)

Hello, I cannot connect to wifi networks using netctl or netctl-auto. Some journalctl -xe output is attached for the two types of errors I encountered. The only action I could remember that could have had anything to do with this was an upgrade of wpa_supplicant, so I googled and found [0].

[arch-general] netctl-auto and netctl refuse to work (probably due to wpa_supplicant)

Hello, I cannot connect to wifi networks using netctl or netctl-auto. Some journalctl -xe output is attached. The only action I could remember that could have had anything to do with this was an upgrade of wpa_supplicant, so I googled and found [0]. However, unlike the commenters on that bug, it

Re: [arch-general] Rerun bootloader from initramfs

> I've been searching if rerunning the bootloader from an initramfs is > possible but my searches have come up empty. > > Anyone here knows how to do it or if it is possible? I would be happy if > someone could provide me with some pointers. I'm afraid I can't help you, but now I'm curious as to

Re: [arch-general] systemd-networkd and netctl with multiple interfaces

> Say you start out on wifi, and open an ssh connection. Then you plug in > ethernet. The ssh session will remain on the wifi route until it is > closed. There's no way* to make an existing connection "jump ship" from > one route to another. If you were to disable the wifi connection as soon > as

Re: [arch-general] systemd-networkd and netctl with multiple interfaces

> Well, it depends on whether wlan0 and eth0 are on different networks. If > they are, then the answer is yes, and you are screwed. > > If both interfaces get the same ip, then you can maintain persistent > connection. For example, let's assume that you constantly switch between > different

[arch-general] systemd-networkd and netctl with multiple interfaces

Hello! I installed Arch on my new Thinkpad T450s over the weekend. Everything works well, but I have a question: I use systemd-networkd to manage my network interfaces and netctl for the connections. I set everything up according to (this)[0] and (this)[1] to get automatic activation of wifi via

Re: [arch-general] systemd-networkd and netctl with multiple interfaces

> I don't use netctl, but you can usually see what default route it uses with > > ip route Thanks for that, I didn't know that command. The LAN is shown above WIFI, which (I assume) means that it takes precedence. > > I have made the experience that newly configured interfaces "steal"

Re: [arch-general] FS mount for google drive

On 06/15/2015 07:39 PM, Javier Vasquez wrote: Do you know if it works under a firewall? Does it support http_proxy env var? Sorry, I do not know either. Just ask (the maintainer)[0], he's really helpful and friendly. Cheers, Bennett [0]: od...@ualberta.ca -- GPG fingerprint: 871F 1047

Re: [arch-general] FS mount for google drive

On 06/14/2015 01:46 AM, Javier Vasquez wrote: I was looking for a way to mount google drive as a FS, and found [1] and [2]. [...] If someone is using whether fuse-google-drive or gdrivefs, please share any drawbacks, pitfalls, how to make it work in teh case of fuse-google-drive, and some

Re: [arch-general] Add wpa_supplicant to the Group 'Base'

In my opinion wpa_supplicant is an important tool, so is it possible to add it to the group 'base'? I strongly disagree. wpa_supplicant is pretty huge and unnecessary for many people, and it also introduces a large additional surface area for exploits. Bennett -- GPG fingerprint: 871F 1047

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Trimming down our default kernel configuration

I am a complete noob and only follow the lists out of interest. I am also very young, so please forgive my impertinence. Thanks Thomas for your work!! Just my 2c: On 03/27/2014 08:34 PM, Nicolas Iooss wrote: 2014-03-27 16:31 GMT+01:00 Bigby James bigby.ja...@crepcran.com: On Thu, Mar 27, 2014

Re: [arch-general] NetworkManager 0.9.8.8-2 does not work with systemd 208

Just as another FYI: I wanted to credit Sébastien Luttringer, who is well known to anyone following the Arch mailing lists, for running the A.R.M. ;) Merci Séblu! --Bennett On 02/24/2014 03:46 AM, Kyle Terrien wrote: On 02/23/2014 06:30 PM, Mark E. Lee wrote: Salutations, I downgraded and

Re: [arch-general] Is there a burning tool able to replace K3b?

Personally, I fell in love with AwesomeWM. It's quick to set up, and i've never looked back. Everything works well automagically! B On 01/25/2014 04:46 AM, David Rosenstrauch wrote: On 01/24/2014 09:24 PM, David C. Rankin wrote: On 01/21/2014 04:43 AM, Ralf Mardorf wrote: I'm experimenting