I'd expect the usual pioneering of Arch for giving the option. I guess it's
up to the maintainers, but I don't see what could delay it in comparison to
Fedora. Is any special building flag needed that could get in the way?
2014-04-06 21:44 GMT-03:00 Daniel Micay danielmi...@gmail.com:
On
I'll answer random things I read in the thread. First, I don't think the
lightweight part of the philosophy is about using stock packages, as
that's implied in the KISS philosophy, you don't need to stress it any more
than that. The same KISS philosophy says one should try to avoid complexity
Daniel is right. netctl and systemd-networkd are two different things.
2014-03-05 17:56 GMT-03:00 Daniel Micay danielmi...@gmail.com:
On 05/03/14 03:22 PM, arnaud gaboury wrote:
Hi,
I do not consider myself as a Linux expert, but rather an advanced
user. I am running Arch for a few
arnaud.gabo...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 10:00 PM, Mario Rugiero mrugi...@gmail.com wrote:
Daniel is right. netctl and systemd-networkd are two different things.
Yes, for sure. Let's take a bet : netctl will one day be obsoleted,
no upstream, and replaced entirely by networl@.service
4 matches
Mail list logo
