Re: [arch-general] Revisiting the SELinux/audit question: Disabling audit on the kernel command line

On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 6:43 PM, Tobias Markus wrote: > Hi, > > As some of you might know, the question of enabling SELinux support in > the official Arch Linux kernel package has been brought up a number of > times. The main issue that has been pointed out the previous time

Re: [arch-general] Experiences with SELinux on Arch

On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 11:25 AM, Remi Gacogne < listes+arch-gene...@valombre.net> wrote: > Hi Niels, > > > since I won't get an answer on the forum except "Read the Wiki" which > > isn't helpful, I ask here. > > Is here anybody with real world experiences with SELinux on Arch? The > > forum

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Trimming down our default kernel configuration

Hello, 2014-03-26 20:18 GMT+01:00 Leonid Isaev lis...@umail.iu.edu: On Wed, 26 Mar 2014 19:56:26 +0100 Thomas Bächler tho...@archlinux.org wrote: Hello all, it won't be too long until 3.14 is out and I want to address a topic that has been bugging me for a while. Our kernel includes

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Trimming down our default kernel configuration

TL;DR: this is a technical answer which can be seen as slightly off-topic as it focus only on SELinux and not much about kernel config trimming. 2014-03-27 13:46 GMT+01:00 Thomas Bächler tho...@archlinux.org: Am 27.03.2014 09:07, schrieb Nicolas Iooss: I agree regarding SELinux/Apparmor (it's

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Trimming down our default kernel configuration

2014-03-27 16:31 GMT+01:00 Bigby James bigby.ja...@crepcran.com: On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 09:07:23AM +0100, Nicolas Iooss wrote: Here are three arguments to motivate my disagreement. * First, removing LSM support makes it difficult for users to test LSM. Before 3.13 kernel, users needed