Hello everybody,
pacman 4.2.0-5 moved to [core] this morning. Can anybody please move expac 4-3
to [extra] as well? Thanks!
--
main(a){char*c=/*Schoene Gruesse */B?IJj;MEH
CX:;,b;for(a/*Chris get my mail address:*/=0;b=c[a++];)
putchar(b-1/(/*
Hi,
when I tried to set up an Arch Linux guest on an external USB
HDD, something strange happened.
VM memory size is: 512 MB
VDIs are: /mnt/archvm/archvm_sda.vdi
/mnt/archvm/archvm_sdb.vdi
Snapshot folder: /mnt/archvm/archvm_snap
After creating this I made a
On Mon, 29 Dec 2014 18:18:04 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
If I try to restore the snapshot, I get the below error. I can't find
information about it in the Internet.
Failed to restore the snapshot Empty partitions of the virtual machine
archVM.
Could not create the differencing medium
Is anyone else trying this out, yet? Seems to be working pretty well
for me, so far. I even re-packaged kodi-pvr-addons-git without the
-git, so I could build their RC3 package against the non-git version
of kodi. I'm just curious if anyone else has hit any big problems,
yet.
=-Jameson
On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 12:27 AM, Ido Rosen i...@kernel.org wrote:
Not sure what the best way to accomplish this would be?
Sounds like the case for pacman hooks. Those were still in the works
though, last time checked.
cheers!
mar77i
On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 5:23 PM, Martti Kühne mysat...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 12:27 AM, Ido Rosen i...@kernel.org wrote:
Not sure what the best way to accomplish this would be?
Sounds like the case for pacman hooks. Those were still in the works
though, last time checked.
Pacman SyncFirst I miss you :_(
https://projects.archlinux.org/pacman.git/tree/NEWS#n122
https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=160697
2014-12-29 23:28 GMT+01:00 Ido Rosen i...@kernel.org:
On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 5:23 PM, Martti Kühne mysat...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec 29, 2014
So, I found 4 executable/binary files installed (out of thousands -
good job guys) that fail a 'ldd' check (missing shared libraries). The
packages in question mark the missing libraries as 'optdepends' so
they never get installed - I filed 4 bug reports, all 4 got closed as
not a bug by the same
On Mon, 29 Dec 2014 17:58:49 -0600
Troy Engel troyengel+a...@gmail.com wrote:
So, I found 4 executable/binary files installed (out of thousands -
good job guys) that fail a 'ldd' check (missing shared libraries). The
packages in question mark the missing libraries as 'optdepends' so
they
On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 6:13 PM, Doug Newgard scim...@archlinux.info wrote:
You found 4 binaries, how many more would you have found if you didn't
coincidently happen to have the optional deps for them already
installed?
If I found more, I would report them - just as I did these four. Using
a
Arch currently uses optional dependencies even when it means that
executables provided by the package aren't going to work with the
minimal set of dependencies. The packages could be split up more to
avoid this without pulling in more stuff, but it's not what packagers
usually choose to it. It's a
To use the sensord example:
in lm_sensors/PKGBUILD:
optdepends=('rrdtool: for logging with sensord')
I am unsure if there is any way to be more blatantly clear than it is
already. :p
This is a phenomenal non-issue, and the perfect example of why
optdepends exists in the first place... as has
On Mon, 29 Dec 2014 18:39:55 -0600
Troy Engel troyengel+a...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 6:13 PM, Doug Newgard
scim...@archlinux.info wrote:
You found 4 binaries, how many more would you have found if you
didn't coincidently happen to have the optional deps for them
already
On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 6:50 PM, Daniel Micay danielmi...@gmail.com wrote:
Arch currently uses optional dependencies even when it means that
executables provided by the package aren't going to work with the
minimal set of dependencies. The packages could be split up more to
avoid this without
Hi,
I registerd my Arch Linux Bugtracker account from this link
https://bugs.archlinux.org/ but I cannot receive my activation code to
complete registration. Anyone can help me resend my activation code to
nhutdm at gmail dot com.
Thanks,
On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 2:40 AM, Minh Nhut Duong nhu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I registerd my Arch Linux Bugtracker account from this link
https://bugs.archlinux.org/ but I cannot receive my activation code to
complete registration. Anyone can help me resend my activation code to
nhutdm at
I try to create my account again but this user already taken. :(
On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 10:49 AM, Eli Schwartz eschwart...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 2:40 AM, Minh Nhut Duong nhu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I registerd my Arch Linux Bugtracker account from this link
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 07:20:42PM -0600, Troy Engel wrote:
On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 6:50 PM, Daniel Micay danielmi...@gmail.com wrote:
Arch currently uses optional dependencies even when it means that
executables provided by the package aren't going to work with the
minimal set of
Hi all,
I have a Develop ineo 25e printer, and want to set it up with CUPS.
I connect to http://localhost:631/ and add the printer, with uploading
the PPD available here:
http://www.develop.eu/en/products/office-products/colour/ineo-25/downloads.html
(English, Linux, version 1.1 dated 2012)
On 30 December 2014 at 05:58, Troy Engel troyengel+a...@gmail.com wrote:
It is my opinion this is a dangerous precedent to install binaries
from an official package that are linked to shared libraries which are
not required to be installed. I'm wondering why Arch considers it
acceptable to
20 matches
Mail list logo
