Re: `makepkg` generates two packages

2024-03-07 Thread lacsaP Patatetom
tin > > On Thu, Mar 7, 2024, 14:41 Ryan Petris wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 7, 2024, at 4:38 AM, Robin Candau wrote: > > On 3/7/24 12:34, lacsaP Patatetom wrote: > > hi, > Hi, > > > > when I run `makepkg`, it generates a second package with the `-de

Re: `makepkg` generates two packages

2024-03-07 Thread lacsaP Patatetom
Le jeu. 7 mars 2024 à 13:28, Robin Candau a écrit : > On 3/7/24 13:21, Ryan Petris wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 7, 2024, at 4:38 AM, Robin Candau wrote: > >> On 3/7/24 12:34, lacsaP Patatetom wrote: > >> > hi, > >> Hi, > >> > > >> > when

`makepkg` generates two packages

2024-03-07 Thread lacsaP Patatetom
hi, when I run `makepkg`, it generates a second package with the `-debug` "extension" (eg. `mypackage-w.x.y-z-x86_64.pkg.tar.zst` and `mypackage-debug-w.x.y-z-x86_64.pkg.tar.zst`). I couldn't find anything about this on the wiki : is this a new feature and/or is there a parameter to pass to

Re: Issues with new NTFS module

2023-11-17 Thread lacsaP Patatetom
Le ven. 17 nov. 2023 à 13:49, Giovanni Santini a écrit : > Hi IacsaP and Lukasz, > On 2023-11-17 08:40, lacsaP Patatetom wrote: > > on the `/proc/sys/vm/` side may be ? > does the `sync` followed by a `sysctl -q vm.drop_caches=3` change things ? > > regards, lacsaP. >

Re: Issues with new NTFS module

2023-11-16 Thread lacsaP Patatetom
Le ven. 17 nov. 2023 à 07:41, Giovanni Santini a écrit : > Hi Marius, > On 2023-11-15 14:16, Marius Kittler wrote: > > Since both are completely different implementations the syncing behavior might > differ. I haven't paid much attention to the syncing behavior of the new > kernel > module but

Re: pacman via pacstrap

2023-11-14 Thread lacsaP Patatetom
Le ven. 10 nov. 2023 à 17:41, Doug Newgard a écrit : > On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 08:40:35 +0100 > lacsaP Patatetom wrote: > > # pacstrap -c -C target/etc/pacman.conf -U target/ > > pkg/numix-gtk-theme-git-2.6.7.r55.ad4b345-1-any.pkg.tar.zst --overwrite > '*' > > >

Re: pacman via pacstrap

2023-11-09 Thread lacsaP Patatetom
t; > On Mon, Nov 6, 2023 at 2:51 PM lacsaP Patatetom > wrote: > >> Le mer. 1 nov. 2023 à 14:51, Christoph Gysin >> a écrit : >> >>> >>> On Wed, Nov 1, 2023 at 1:45 AM lacsaP Patatetom >>> wrote: >>> >>>> I use `pacstrap

Re: pacman via pacstrap

2023-11-06 Thread lacsaP Patatetom
Le mer. 1 nov. 2023 à 14:51, Christoph Gysin a écrit : > > On Wed, Nov 1, 2023 at 1:45 AM lacsaP Patatetom > wrote: > >> I use `pacstrap -U` to install locally forged packages in a dedicated >> folder. >> this dedicated folder already contains some files and some

pacman via pacstrap

2023-10-31 Thread lacsaP Patatetom
hi, I use `pacstrap -U` to install locally forged packages in a dedicated folder. this dedicated folder already contains some files and some of these files are causing problems for `pacstrap -U` (eg. `pacman -U`). i'd like to be able to use `--overwrite` option and pass it from `pacstrap`. is

Re: colored prompt in early userspace

2023-03-28 Thread lacsaP Patatetom
Le mar. 28 mars 2023 à 16:34, lacsaP Patatetom a écrit : > > hi, > > when you add the `break` parameter to the list of parameters passed > when the system boots, you find yourself in an interactive shell that > allows you to issue commands, perform tests, and so on... > >

colored prompt in early userspace

2023-03-28 Thread lacsaP Patatetom
hi, when you add the `break` parameter to the list of parameters passed when the system boots, you find yourself in an interactive shell that allows you to issue commands, perform tests, and so on... the shell is apparently provided by `ash`. how to have a colored prompt (which visually helps

Re: X application preferences

2023-03-24 Thread lacsaP Patatetom
Le ven. 24 mars 2023 à 11:43, lacsaP Patatetom a écrit : > > Le ven. 24 mars 2023 à 11:38, David a écrit : > > > > On Fri, 24 Mar 2023 at 10:25, lacsaP Patatetom wrote: > > > Le ven. 24 mars 2023 à 11:13, <2qdxy4rzwzuui...@potatochowder.com> a > > >

Re: X application preferences

2023-03-24 Thread lacsaP Patatetom
Le ven. 24 mars 2023 à 11:38, David a écrit : > > On Fri, 24 Mar 2023 at 10:25, lacsaP Patatetom wrote: > > Le ven. 24 mars 2023 à 11:13, <2qdxy4rzwzuui...@potatochowder.com> a écrit : > > > On 2023-03-24 at 11:03:33 +0100, lacsaP Patatetom > > > wrote

Re: X application preferences

2023-03-24 Thread lacsaP Patatetom
Le ven. 24 mars 2023 à 11:29, Ralf Mardorf a écrit : > > On Fri, 2023-03-24 at 11:03 +0100, lacsaP Patatetom wrote: > > I would like the `lxtask` application (LXDE task manager) to open > > systematically in "always on top" mode > > Hi, > > fo

Re: X application preferences

2023-03-24 Thread lacsaP Patatetom
Le ven. 24 mars 2023 à 11:13, <2qdxy4rzwzuui...@potatochowder.com> a écrit : > > On 2023-03-24 at 11:03:33 +0100, > lacsaP Patatetom wrote: > > > I would like the `lxtask` application (LXDE task manager) to open > > systematically in "always

X application preferences

2023-03-24 Thread lacsaP Patatetom
hi, I would like the `lxtask` application (LXDE task manager) to open systematically in "always on top" mode : is it possible to do this in the `~/.Xresources` file ? otherwise, where can it be configured ? regards, lacsaP.

Re: /dev/stderr in early userspace

2023-03-23 Thread lacsaP Patatetom
Le jeu. 23 mars 2023 à 11:02, nl6720 a écrit : > > On Thursday, 23 March 2023 10:49:40 EET lacsaP Patatetom wrote: > > hi, > > > > I recently noticed that `/dev/stderr` was not present at the very > > beginning of the boot, in early userspace. > > > >

/dev/stderr in early userspace

2023-03-23 Thread lacsaP Patatetom
hi, I recently noticed that `/dev/stderr` was not present at the very beginning of the boot, in early userspace. if I add `break` parameter to have control during this step and do a `ls` test, this is what I get: ``` [rootfs ]# ls -l /dev/std* ls: /dev/std*: No such file or directory ``` Is

Re: bio_check_ro @ blk-core.c

2023-03-21 Thread lacsaP Patatetom
Le mar. 21 mars 2023 à 11:27, Emil Velikov a écrit : > > On Mon, 20 Mar 2023 at 16:49, lacsaP Patatetom wrote: > > > > hi, > > > > back again ;-) > > > > this github page will perhaps allow you to better understand my problem and > > to guide me t

Re: linux headers

2023-03-21 Thread lacsaP Patatetom
again thank you for explanations/clarifications. have a good day, regards, lacsaP. Le mar. 21 mars 2023 à 11:16, Genes Lists a écrit : > On 3/21/23 04:26, lacsaP Patatetom wrote: > > hi everybody, > > > > > my development workstation is running 6.1.20-1-lts and I made &

Re: linux headers

2023-03-21 Thread lacsaP Patatetom
a good one , bpftrace and other tools that might rely on kernel > hooks , or something specific module or statically compiled feature , but > as Ralf said , the vast majority of user land applications can be used > interchangeably with different kernels . > > On Mon, 20 Mar 2023 at 11:59, l

Re: bio_check_ro @ blk-core.c

2023-03-20 Thread lacsaP Patatetom
revent LVM to modify a read-only disk. regards, lacsaP. Le lun. 20 mars 2023 à 10:11, lacsaP Patatetom a écrit : > hi Emil, > > forgive me if this is the third time I've replied to this message but I > received a moderation warning the two previous times that my reply was o

Re: linux headers

2023-03-20 Thread lacsaP Patatetom
with the recompiled modified kernel). regards, lacsaP. Le lun. 20 mars 2023 à 12:49, Ralf Mardorf a écrit : > On Mon, 2023-03-20 at 12:27 +0100, lacsaP Patatetom wrote: > > if I understand correctly, I can install my package linux-lts-perso- > > 6.1.15-2-x86_64.pkg.tar.zst, boot on it (

Re: linux headers

2023-03-20 Thread lacsaP Patatetom
it's clear yes, thanks for these explanations/clarifications. Le lun. 20 mars 2023 à 12:42, Genes Lists a écrit : > > > > > if I understand correctly, I can install my package > > linux-lts-perso-6.1.15-2-x86_64.pkg.tar.zst, boot on it (eg. "my" > > kernel) and continue to use the binaries

Re: linux headers

2023-03-20 Thread lacsaP Patatetom
Le lun. 20 mars 2023 à 12:00, Genes Lists a écrit : > On 3/20/23 06:44, lacsaP Patatetom wrote: > > Please don't top post on mailing lists. > I use GMail and just click on "Respond to all" : is this the "top post" ? should I only answer you or not put you indi

Re: linux headers

2023-03-20 Thread lacsaP Patatetom
:02, Genes Lists a écrit : > On 3/20/23 05:27, lacsaP Patatetom wrote: > > hi, > > > > > - When you change the source you must also bump pkgrel as the package > is now different. > > - If you want to build your own version of an Arch package, you should >

linux headers

2023-03-20 Thread lacsaP Patatetom
hi, I have some questions about the compilation process which I am not familiar with. #1 using ArchLinux PKGBUILD, I recompiled the LTS kernel with a slight change introduced in the block/blk-core.c file and two files were generated : linux-lts-6.1.15-1-x86_64.pkg.tar.zst and

Re: bio_check_ro @ blk-core.c

2023-03-20 Thread lacsaP Patatetom
hi Emil, forgive me if this is the third time I've replied to this message but I received a moderation warning the two previous times that my reply was over 40Kb when my preparation file was only 13Kb... I haven't had any feedback about this moderation since last week, so I don't know if you