On 2/23/21 8:48 PM, David C. Rankin via arch-general wrote:
I understood why it was done, I follow the kernel announcements, etc, but
was a bit bewildered by Arch moving LTS to 5.10 before Linux moved to 5.11.
Even today, we have:
linux 5.10.16.arch1-1
and
linux-lts 5.10.17-1
So the
Em fevereiro 23, 2021 22:48 David C. Rankin via arch-general escreveu:
I understood why it was done, I follow the kernel announcements, etc, but
was a bit bewildered by Arch moving LTS to 5.10 before Linux moved to 5.11.
Even today, we have:
linux 5.10.16.arch1-1
and
linux-lts 5.10.17-1
On 2/17/21 9:50 AM, David Rosenstrauch via arch-general wrote:
> On 2/17/21 3:48 AM, David C. Rankin via arch-general wrote:
>> Archdevs,
>>
>> You move of both linux and linux-lts to the same kernel is bewildering.
>> That
>> eliminates all fallback capability lts provides. Currently,
On 2021-02-17 19:50, Ralf Mardorf via arch-general wrote:
On Wed, 17 Feb 2021 12:59:51 -0500, brent s. via arch-general wrote:
Unless you have a very specific need, I'd instead recommend using
something like KVM
It's exactly the other way round. Virtualbox is a painless out of the
box
On Wed, 17 Feb 2021 17:48:54 -0300, Giancarlo Razzolini wrote:
>Em fevereiro 17, 2021 15:50 Ralf Mardorf via arch-general escreveu:
>> It's exactly the other way round. Virtualbox is a painless out of the
>> box solution satisfying a lot of needs. Only if you have a very
>> special need, consider
Em fevereiro 17, 2021 15:50 Ralf Mardorf via arch-general escreveu:
It's exactly the other way round. Virtualbox is a painless out of the
box solution satisfying a lot of needs. Only if you have a very
special need, consider to migrate to something less comfortable such as
KVM.
What part of
On 2/17/21 13:50, Ralf Mardorf via arch-general wrote:
> but you'll lose all the out of the box features
> virtualbox provides, such as file sharing without any effort.
At the risk of this devolving into off-topic territory, this is a highly
subjective statement. e.g. See [0][1].
I switched from
Btw. There's still no solution for the Intel GPU issue with kernel
versions > 5.4 ;). In my experiences migrating to the "modesetting"
driver allows to get rid of some issues, at the expense of new issues.
However, somebody mentions already building our own kernels. This is
what I do anyway. It's
On Wed, 17 Feb 2021 12:59:51 -0500, brent s. via arch-general wrote:
>Unless you have a very specific need, I'd instead recommend using
>something like KVM
It's exactly the other way round. Virtualbox is a painless out of the
box solution satisfying a lot of needs. Only if you have a very
special
On 17/2/21 9:48, David C. Rankin via arch-general wrote:
Archdevs,
You move of both linux and linux-lts to the same kernel is bewildering. That
eliminates all fallback capability lts provides. Currently, virtualbox Arch
guests are broken on 5.10 (as with most other distros).
See:
On 2/17/21 03:48, David C. Rankin via arch-general wrote:
> Archdevs,
>
> You move of both linux and linux-lts to the same kernel is bewildering. That
> eliminates all fallback capability lts provides. Currently, virtualbox Arch
> guests are broken on 5.10 (as with most other distros).
>
>
On Wednesday, 17 February 2021 16:58:18 CET sL1pKn07 SpinFlo via arch-general
wrote:
> Is strange see the version 5.10 LTS have the EOL in 2022 and the 5.4
> in 2025 (4.19 in 2024, 4.14 in 2023, etc)
This is why:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/ybbkplrxzzmpy...@kroah.com/
El mié, 17 feb 2021 a las 16:51, David Rosenstrauch via arch-general
() escribió:
>
> On 2/17/21 3:48 AM, David C. Rankin via arch-general wrote:
> > Archdevs,
> >
> >You move of both linux and linux-lts to the same kernel is bewildering.
> > That
> > eliminates all fallback capability lts
On 2/17/21 3:48 AM, David C. Rankin via arch-general wrote:
Archdevs,
You move of both linux and linux-lts to the same kernel is bewildering. That
eliminates all fallback capability lts provides. Currently, virtualbox Arch
guests are broken on 5.10 (as with most other distros).
See:
Em fevereiro 17, 2021 11:37 Uwe Sauter escreveu:
One could vote for keeping the linux-tls on 5.4 as long as linux is also an lts
release and when
linux has moved to the next non-lts then linux-tls would be set to the newes
lts available. In this
case:
In this case Arch follows upstream, so
Am 17.02.21 um 15:18 schrieb Giancarlo Razzolini via arch-general:
> Em fevereiro 17, 2021 11:07 Jens John via arch-general escreveu:
>>
>> I just would recommend to always add the kernel packages to pacman's
>> IgnorePkg list, and upgrade
>> them only in a strictly controlled way. You can't
Em fevereiro 17, 2021 11:07 Jens John via arch-general escreveu:
I just would recommend to always add the kernel packages to pacman's IgnorePkg
list, and upgrade them only in a strictly controlled way. You can't trust a
volunteer project like Arch to take all issues into consideration.
On Wed, 17 Feb 2021, at 09:48, David C. Rankin via arch-general wrote:
> Archdevs,
>
> You move of both linux and linux-lts to the same kernel is bewildering. That
> eliminates all fallback capability lts provides. Currently, virtualbox Arch
> guests are broken on 5.10 (as with most other
Archdevs,
You move of both linux and linux-lts to the same kernel is bewildering. That
eliminates all fallback capability lts provides. Currently, virtualbox Arch
guests are broken on 5.10 (as with most other distros).
See: https://www.virtualbox.org/ticket/20055
With linux on 5.10 and
19 matches
Mail list logo
