Re: Proposal to increase the default vm.max_map_count value

2024-04-02 Thread Genes Lists
On Tue, 2024-04-02 at 12:29 +0200, Robin Candau wrote: > On 4/2/24 11:59 AM, Robin Candau wrote: Couple of comments. * In lkml thread on same topic not everyone is on board with this [1] * Where to put this kind of thing Would it make sense to collect these kind of "system" settings,

Re: Proposal to increase the default vm.max_map_count value

2024-03-25 Thread Robin Candau
On 3/25/24 5:48 PM, Martin Rys wrote: Did anyone try proposing changes to the actual upstream Linux default instead of just hacking it higher downstream? Yes, see this message [1] from the original thread in the Arch-Dev-Public ML. Although, I personally doubt that upstream will consider this

Re: Proposal to increase the default vm.max_map_count value

2024-03-25 Thread Martin Rys
Did anyone try proposing changes to the actual upstream Linux default instead of just hacking it higher downstream? Doesn't look like it's even configurable at the moment, based on the Fedora document. Martin On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 5:08 PM Rein Fernhout (Levitating) wrote: > > Seeing as other

Re: Proposal to increase the default vm.max_map_count value

2024-03-25 Thread Rein Fernhout (Levitating)
Seeing as other distributions have already adopted this change and gaming is a popular usecase for ArchLinux I do think this is a good thing to have. The default value will only be more of a bottleneck in the future. There's a balance in sticking to defaults. It'd be a shame if users need to