nature>
>>> ___
>>> Architecture mailing list
>>> Architecture@wso2.org
>>> https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Malintha Amarasinghe
>>
fthikar*
>> Software Engineer | WSO2 Inc.
>>
>> Email: arsha...@wso2.com
>> Mobile: +94719806525
>> Web: http://wso2.com
>>
>> <http://wso2.com/signature>
>> ___
>> Architecture mailing list
>&g
tree/master/featu
>>>> res/apimgt/org.wso2.carbon.apimgt.admin.feature/src/main/res
>>>> ources/admin
>>>> [4]: https://github.com/wso2/carbon-apimgt/blob/master/featu
>>>> res/apimgt/org.wso2.carbon.apimgt.publisher.feature/src/main
>>>> /resources/publisher/source
ost:9292/pets-store/public/app/images/logo.png)
>> - Resources of an extension
>> -
>> /public/extensions///
>> (e.g. https://localhost:9292/pets-store/public/extensions/widgets/
>> calendar/styles.css)
>> - Resources of a the
75624 <+94%2077%20787%205624>
>>>> Web : http://wso2.com
>>>>
>>>> <http://wso2.com/signature>
>>>>
>>>> _______
>>>> Architecture mailing list
>>>> Architecture@wso2.org
>
Hi Lakmali
On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 11:51 PM, Lakmali Baminiwatta <lakm...@wso2.com>
wrote:
> On 20 April 2017 at 19:19, Joseph Fonseka <jos...@wso2.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> @Jo
> Even though the API is designed to work with client credential, it doesn't
> mean
atta <lakm...@wso2.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Jo,
>>>
>>> On 20 April 2017 at 09:01, Joseph Fonseka <jos...@wso2.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Lakmali
>>>>
>>>> Small thing, will the portal app subscription b
e Tech Lead*
> *WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com <http://wso2.com/>*
> *Committer and PMC member, Apache Stratos *
> *AMIE (SL)*
> *Mobile: 0772269575*
>
> ___
> Architecture mailing list
> Architecture@wso2.org
:06 PM, Sanjeewa Malalgoda <sanje...@wso2.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 7:12 PM, Nuwan Dias <nuw...@wso2.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Ma
role. Almost all consumers of the API are general users and
>>>>> hence do not have the subscriber role. So why is it a concern to allow the
>>>>> person who's developing the API to access it?
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu
a <lakm...@wso2.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 23 March 2017 at 13:46, Joseph Fonseka <jos...@wso2.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 1:01 PM, Lakmali Baminiwatta <lakm...@wso2.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
&g
refreshing
>>>the token. So here also, I think we can generate the test token when the
>>>user is authenticated(log in to the UUF app) and store it in the local
>>>storage. I believe its okay to display this access token for the user.
>>
/wso2.com
> lean.enterprise.middleware
> mobile: +94 71 2335936
> blog : lakmali.com
>
>
> ___
> Architecture mailing list
> Architecture@wso2.org
> https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture
>
>
--
--
ture mailing list
>> Architecture@wso2.org
>> https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> *Susinda Perera*
> Software Engineer
> B.Sc.(Eng), M.Sc(Computer Science), AMIE(SL)
> Mobile:(+94)716049075
> Blog: susinda.blogspot.com
> WSO2 Inc. http://wso2.com/
er: https://twitter.com/bhathiyax <https://twitter.com/bhathiyax>*
>> *Blog: http://movingaheadblog.blogspot.com
>> <http://movingaheadblog.blogspot.com/>*
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Nuwan Dias
>
> Software Architect - WSO2, Inc. http://wso2.com
> email : nuw...@wso2.com
> Phone : +94 777 775
;
>> ___
>> Architecture mailing list
>> Architecture@wso2.org
>> https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> *Bhathiya Jayasekara*
> *Senior Software Engineer,*
> *WSO2 i
its own usage even without dependency to
>> root resource.
>> But for me endpoints are tightly bound to API unlike other sub resources.
>> If we consider image like resource then even without API dependency it has
>> its own mean. Same applies for swagger definition etc. But IMO sub
gt; Please add your suggestions into the above approaches.
>
> Thanks
>
> *Tharindu Dharmarathna*Software Engineer
> WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com
> lean.enterprise.middleware
>
> mobile: *+94779109091 <+94%2077%20910%209091>*
>
ion in the HTML which I believe what zone also
represent.
Thanks
Jo
>
> Thanks.
>
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 8:05 AM, Joseph Fonseka <jos...@wso2.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> +1, few clarifications bellow.
>>
>> 1. I guess the default mode will be
.carbon.uuf.common.foundation
>
> WDYT?
>
> Thanks.
> --
> Sajith Janaprasad Ariyarathna
> Software Engineer; WSO2, Inc.; http://wso2.com/
> <https://wso2.com/signature>
>
> ___
> Architecture mailing list
#20, Palm Grove, Colombo 03, Sri Lanka
>>> Mobile: +94 (71) 214 1576
>>> Email: lasant...@wso2.com
>>> Web:www.wso2.com
>>>
>>> lean . enterprise . middleware
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> *Imesh Gunaratne*
>> Soft
On Sat, Nov 19, 2016 at 3:38 PM, Joseph Fonseka <jos...@wso2.com> wrote:
> Hi All
>
> Another most obvious advantage of using UUIDs would that it will simplify
> import/export of APIs. I am +1 for using UUIDs as primary keys.
>
In a more correct term UUIDs will simplif
2] - https://docs.wso2.com/display/AM200/apidocs/store/
>
> Thanks,
> NuwanD.
>
> --
> Nuwan Dias
>
> Software Architect - WSO2, Inc. http://wso2.com
> email : nuw...@wso2.com
> Phone : +94 777 775 729
>
--
--
*Joseph Fonseka*
WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com
lea
com
>>>>
>>>> ___
>>>> Architecture mailing list
>>>> Architecture@wso2.org
>>>> https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>&g
ure mailing list
>> Architecture@wso2.org
>> https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Uvindra
>
> Mobile: 33962
>
> ___
> Architecture mailing list
>
2, Inc. | http://wso2.com/
>> Lean . Enterprise . Middleware
>>
>> ___
>> Architecture mailing list
>> Architecture@wso2.org
>> https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture
>>
>>
>
>
>
r
> hardcod).
>
> So can't we ignore the importance of "authorizationUrl/tokenUrl" values in
> this case?
>
> Thanks,
> Praminda
>
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 1:43 AM, Joseph Fonseka <jos...@wso2.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Praminda
>>
>> How was the &q
;>>> 2. Proper assertion handling.
>>>>>
>>>>> @Praminda, please add anything if I have missed.
>>>>>
>>>>> Appreciate your thoughts on this.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Malintha
>>
;>>>>- Add API thumbnail by calling to the end point
>>>>>>>>http://localhost:9763/api/am/publisher/v0.9//apis/{apiId}/thumbnail
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> <http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2F127.0.0.1%3A97
t;with corresponding image file.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> else, If the value of query parameter "updateIfExists" is false,
>>>>>> importing action ends up giving a appropriate error message stating API
>>>
m
> Mobile : +94 773922820
>
> <http://stackoverflow.com/users/515034>
> <http://lk.linkedin.com/in/abimaran>
> <http://www.lkabimaran.blogspot.com/> <https://github.com/abimarank>
> <https://twitter.com/abimaran>
>
>
--
--
*Josep
rs(); validate code and all answers and
>>>return a code if success
>>>-
>>>
>>>updatePassword();Updates the password in the system. Need to provide
>>>the key from notification, new password
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
asung AT spamfree wso2.com
>> linked-in: http://lk.linkedin.com/in/gajasinghe
>> blog: http://kasunbg.org
>>
>>
>>
>> ___________
>> Architecture mailing list
>> Architecture@wso2.org
>> https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture
&g
;
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> *Visitha Wijesinghe*
>>>> Software Engineer Intern.
>>>> WSO2 Lanka (pvt) Ltd.
>>>>
>>>> Mobile - +94772617187
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> *Ruwan Abeyk
t;> ___
>>>>> Architecture mailing list
>>>>> Architecture@wso2.org
>>>>> https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> __
iers will not be appropriate IMO as the immediate
>>>> sub-resource is not a tier, but a tier type. Or can we just make the group
>>>> parameter mandatory?
>>>>
>>>> Thank you.
>>>> Malintha
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Dec 1,
gt; Thank you,
>> Malintha
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Malintha Amarasinghe
>> Software Engineer
>> *WSO2, Inc. - lean | enterprise | middleware*
>> http://wso2.com/
>>
>> Mobile : +94 712383306
>>
>
>
>
>
eir roles/privileges etc (as example, api consumer
>>>>> is
>>>>> not allowed to call delete API operation).
>>>>>
>>>>> Since we are developing jax-rs web application and we have CXF run
>>>>> time in API Manager, i started
paths*}"
which will qualify above paths see [1].
Thanks
Jo
[1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6570#section-3.2.6
>
> Thanks,
> sanjeewa.
>
> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 12:00 PM, Joseph Fonseka <jos...@wso2.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>> Do you think
ype(store/publisher).
>>> Or other option is maintain single data model and fill required data
>>> based on used service(if its publisher back end URL parameter will present
>>> with value but if its store then back end URLs will not be there).
>>> We need to di
will not be there).
> We need to discuss this and come to conclusion.
>
> I'm sure we need to focus on this when we implement ES REST API.
> Appreciate your suggestions and comments on this.
>
> Thanks,
> sanjeewa.
>
> --
>
> *Sanjeewa Malalgo
___
Architecture mailing list
Architecture@wso2.org
https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture
--
--
*Joseph Fonseka*
WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com
lean.enterprise.middleware
mobile: +94 772 512 430
skype: jpfonseka
* http://lk.linkedin.com/in/rumeshbandara
are deprecating we need to provide a proper migration process for
users that might be using WSDL endpoint.
Please share your thoughts.
Thanks
Jo
--
--
*Joseph Fonseka*
WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com
lean.enterprise.middleware
mobile: +94 772 512 430
skype: jpfonseka
* http://lk.linkedin.com
: Skype]
http://@rmmpremaratne
--
--
*Joseph Fonseka*
WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com
lean.enterprise.middleware
mobile: +94 772 512 430
skype: jpfonseka
* http://lk.linkedin.com/in/rumeshbandara*
___
Architecture mailing list
Architecture@wso2.org
https
it in rest API level(api subscriber should not allow to
update API).
Thanks,
sanjeewa.
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 11:07 PM, Joseph Fonseka jos...@wso2.com wrote:
Hi Frank
Yes 2pm is fine for me, my skype is jpfonseka. Will ask Sanjeewa
Malalgoda to join as well he was working on the ground
You can find the diff of the changes here [2]
https://github.com/hevayo/restful-apim/commit/ace429f3f4f2c62c36c5b4d55e9637c5db24b2ae
[2]
https://github.com/hevayo/restful-apim/commit/ace429f3f4f2c62c36c5b4d55e9637c5db24b2ae
On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 12:56 PM, Joseph Fonseka jos...@wso2.com wrote
to you then!
Best regards,
Frank
2015-03-30 13:03 GMT+02:00 Joseph Fonseka jos...@wso2.com:
Hi Frank
Thanks for the feedback. And it is nice to see how we can control cashing
and concurrency with the additional headers. We will update the remaining
APIs with the same concepts.
Please let
whether this fits into the
plan for implementing in the next release.
Looking forward
Best regards,
Frank
2015-03-26 4:52 GMT+01:00 Joseph Fonseka jos...@wso2.com:
Hi Frank
What are the headers we should include ?
1. For the access token header we can define it globally
the href of an existing API to /apis
endpoint. Since we are not there yet, we can use some json representation
of the existing API.
What do you think?
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 12:03 AM, Joseph Fonseka jos...@wso2.com wrote:
Hi Frank
Thanks for the feedback. And it is nice to see how we can
, the
requests and APIs.
Best regards,
Frank
2015-03-24 17:34 GMT+01:00 Joseph Fonseka jos...@wso2.com:
Hi All
We are planing to implement a RESTFul API to expose the API Manager
functionality. This will be a replacement to the currently provided Store
and Publisher APIs [1]
https
/display/AM180/Store+APIs
[3] http://hevayo.github.io/restful-apim/
--
*Joseph Fonseka*
WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com
lean.enterprise.middleware
mobile: +94 772 512 430
skype: jpfonseka
* http://lk.linkedin.com/in/rumeshbandara*
___
Architecture mailing list
, Joseph Fonseka jos...@wso2.com
wrote:
Hi
@Amila
For options call we can respond per API basis, based on the HTTP
methods defined in the API. And those methods can be sent via Allow
header. Also the same methods can be sent in CORS headers too.
@Nuwan
Yes the Max-Forwards is the problem
at 11:40 AM, Joseph Fonseka jos...@wso2.com wrote:
Hi
Currently in API Manager we send the OPTIONS call to the back-end server
to respond. But if the API does not expose all the HTTP methods in
back-end, OPTIONS call response will be invalid.
1. Should we respond to the OPTIONS call from
/jira/browse/APIMANAGER-1704
--
*Joseph Fonseka*
WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com
lean.enterprise.middleware
mobile: +94 772 512 430
skype: jpfonseka
* http://lk.linkedin.com/in/rumeshbandara*
___
Architecture mailing list
Architecture@wso2.org
https
captured in API definition.
Regards
Jo
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 3:37 PM, Sanjeewa Malalgoda sanje...@wso2.com
wrote:
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 11:40 AM, Joseph Fonseka jos...@wso2.com wrote:
Hi
Currently in API Manager we send the OPTIONS call to the back-end server
to respond. But if the API does
can both use. Current implementation of jaggery i18n support [1]
does this through json files stored in the web app. My other comments are
inline -
[1] -
https://github.com/wso2/jaggery-extensions/blob/master/i18n/module/scripts/i18n.js
Cheers~
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 11:22 PM, Joseph Fonseka
*
___
Architecture mailing list
Architecture@wso2.org
https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture
--
--
*Joseph Fonseka*
WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com
lean.enterprise.middleware
mobile: +94 772 512 430
skype: jpfonseka
* http://lk.linkedin.com/in/rumeshbandara
. enterprise . middleware
___
Architecture mailing list
Architecture@wso2.org
https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture
--
--
*Joseph Fonseka*
WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com
lean.enterprise.middleware
mobile: +94 772 512 430
skype
client).
IMO we should consider single API import/export and deployment movement
when we plan solution. Also it would be ideal if we can use CApp deployer
model for this solution.
Thanks,
sanjeewa.
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 9:05 PM, Joseph Fonseka jos...@wso2.com
wrote:
Hi Lakshman
___
Architecture mailing list
Architecture@wso2.org
https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture
--
--
*Joseph Fonseka*
WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com
lean.enterprise.middleware
mobile: +94 772 512 430
skype: jpfonseka
* http://lk.linkedin.com/in/rumeshbandara
/architecture
--
--
*Joseph Fonseka*
WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com
lean.enterprise.middleware
mobile: +94 772 512 430
skype: jpfonseka
* http://lk.linkedin.com/in/rumeshbandara*
___
Architecture mailing list
Architecture@wso2.org
https://mail.wso2.org/cgi
your thoughts.
Thanks
Jo
--
*Joseph Fonseka*
WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com
lean.enterprise.middleware
mobile: +94 772 512 430
skype: jpfonseka
* http://lk.linkedin.com/in/rumeshbandara*
___
Architecture mailing list
Architecture@wso2.org
https
for complete
rebranding including for example company logo, etc.
Dmitry
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 2:07 AM, Joseph Fonseka jos...@wso2.com wrote:
Hi All
In an APIM multi-tenanted deployment there might be a requirement for the
tenants to customize the store look and feel. We are hoping
://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture
--
--
*Joseph Fonseka*
WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com
lean.enterprise.middleware
mobile: +94 772 512 430
skype: jpfonseka
* http://lk.linkedin.com/in/rumeshbandara*
___
Architecture mailing list
it.
Cheers
Jo
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 5:29 AM, Sanjeewa Malalgoda sanje...@wso2.comwrote:
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 10:08 PM, Joseph Fonseka jos...@wso2.com wrote:
Hi All
Shall we use Apache Velocity to generate synapse config for APIs. Key
benefits using Velocity over current method are.
1
included in APIM so we do not need additional
dependencies.
Regards
Jo
--
*Joseph Fonseka*
WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com
lean.enterprise.middleware
mobile: +94 772 512 430
skype: jpfonseka
* http://lk.linkedin.com/in/rumeshbandara*
___
Architecture mailing
level?
On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Joseph Fonseka jos...@wso2.com wrote:
Hi Sanjiva
Jo does this also address secured endpoints? E.g. basic auth secured or
WSSec-UT or other (as long as its supported by the ESB)?
The plan is to add most of the Endpoint configuration to the Publisher UI
Forwarding mail to Architecture from dev.
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 2:12 PM, Joseph Fonseka jos...@wso2.com wrote:
Hi
In the current APIM we only support Address endpoint type. So we are
planing to include other endpoint types which are supported by the ESB.
Following are the other endpoint
68 matches
Mail list logo
