Please refer my in-line comment
On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 7:37 AM, Joseph Fonseka jos...@wso2.com wrote:
Hi
Didn't find tenant management on the list has it been handled separately ?
It is listed under WSO2 IS configure related UI components.
+1 for moving the UI out of the Kernal but
Please see my In-line comment.
On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 7:23 AM, Chan duli...@wso2.com wrote:
+1 for building a light weight modern UI framework on top of carbon.
Actually for EMM 1.1.0 release we are in the process of using jaggery-fiber
[1] which aims to build a component sharing framework.
+1 for building a light weight modern UI framework on top of carbon.
Actually for EMM 1.1.0 release we are in the process of using jaggery-fiber
[1] which aims to build a component sharing framework. I was thinking of
building a feature's layer on top of the jaggery-fiber where we have the
ability
Hi
Didn't find tenant management on the list has it been handled separately ?
+1 for moving the UI out of the Kernal but what are the benefits we are
targeting from this ?
Thanks
Jo
On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 7:23 AM, Chan duli...@wso2.com wrote:
+1 for building a light weight modern UI
copied to Architecture mailing list
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 6:08 PM, Samisa Abeysinghe sam...@wso2.com wrote:
Why is this thread private?
Thanks,
Samisa...
Samisa Abeysinghe
Vice President Delivery
WSO2 Inc.
http://wso2.com
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 5:30 PM, Pubudu Dissanayake
Hi All,
I do understand that keeping the Kernal as light as possible is a good
idea. +1 to keep the UI apart from the Kernal. However we need to think
about the UI framework as well. Almost all our products have a pretty solid
admin console, and some has user facing console (AM/ES/UES etc) these
