[fedora-arm] Re: Fedora Linux 39 Final blocker status summary #3

On Sat, Oct 21, 2023 at 8:12 AM Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Sat, 2023-10-21 at 11:34 +0200, Tomasz Torcz wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 08:40:43PM -0500, Chris Adams wrote: > > > Once upon a time, Adam Williamson said: > > > > 6. distribution - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2242759 - NEW > >

[fedora-arm] Moving everything to ImageBuilder in F37? (was Re: Re: Fedora on Pinephone Pro & path to upstreaming)

Bringing this subthread to devel@ since apparently this has a wide impact... On Sat, Feb 12, 2022 at 2:26 PM Peter Robinson wrote: > > > This is great new for Fedora because I think it means we can use the normal > > Fedora tools for building ARM images to create UEFI bootable images without >

[fedora-arm] Raspberry Pi hardware accelerated media support

Hey folks, I was just looking up Fedora's hardware support for the Raspberry Pi platform vs the Raspberry Pi OS, and I noticed in the FAQ that we indicate that the camera and accelerated media stuff doesn't work in Fedora[1]. I know that previously this depended on weird blobs and a fork of the

[fedora-arm] Re: What if Fedora stopped building for 32-bit ARM (armv7hl) in F36+?

On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 7:10 AM Jeffrey Walton wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 6:53 AM Peter Robinson wrote: > > > > > I think that keeping 32-bit ARM support is a good idea, but only if > > > Fedora is willing to cross-compile. Native compilation on ARMv7 is a > > > dead end. > > > > Know

[fedora-arm] Re: The future of a Fedora LXQT Spin on Raspberry 3+?

On Sat, Sep 4, 2021 at 7:18 AM Zamir Sun wrote: > > I don’t remember we requested the LXQt image for ARM or AARCH64. Do you still > remember how you install it before? I tend to think you’ve installed the > desktop from another image. > As far as I know, spins need to explicitly request to

[fedora-arm] Re: Fedora 33 ARM and BTRFS

On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 4:43 PM Michael Whapples wrote: > > Neal and Matthew thanks for clarifying that. Yes the various > announcements do say desktop editions, the significance of that must > have just passed me by. > > > would be nice if the ARM image installer would allow selecting the FS >

[fedora-arm] Re: Fedora 33 ARM and BTRFS

On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 3:45 PM Michael Whapples wrote: > > Hello, > > Should Fedora 33 on ARM use BTRFS by default? > > > I downloaded Fedora-Minimal-armhfp-33-1.2-sda.raw.xz image and installed > it to my Odroid XU4. Checking output from mount -l shows / mounted as > EXT4. I thought Fedora 33

[fedora-arm] Re: Qt with GLES

On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 7:09 AM rinigus wrote: > > libhybris systems don't have libGL.so at all. It is for "regular" > Android devices transformed to glibc Linux through libhybris. So, when > compiling anything that links to libGL, I get into trouble. > Why wouldn't libhybris work through glvnd

[fedora-arm] Re: Qt with GLES

On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 6:59 AM rinigus wrote: > > I am looking for Qt that would not depend on libGL at all, something > like https://mitya57.me/weblog/2020/01/qt-opengl-es-packages-available.html > for debian. I guess there are no plans for that yet. > Is there a good reason for doing it that

[fedora-arm] Re: Qt with GLES

On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 6:31 AM rinigus wrote: > > Hi, > > few weeks ago we started working on porting Nemomobile to Fedora 32 as > a base. Now I am hitting an issue when trying to make it work with > libhybris device. On that device, I have GLESv2 and would need Qt that > is not linked to libGL.

[fedora-arm] Re: Questions for building RPMs for armel and armfp

On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 12:40 PM, fedora_arm wrote: > On 07/16/2017 02:42 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: >> On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 2:26 AM, fedora_arm >> wrote: >>> On 07/15/2017 06:17 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: Fedora hasn't

[fedora-arm] Re: Questions for building RPMs for armel and armfp

On Sat, Jul 15, 2017 at 9:26 PM, fedora_arm wrote: > On 07/15/2017 06:17 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: >> Fedora hasn't supported anything less than ARMv7 (armhfp) since Fedora 18. > > Not what I was hoping. But lack of an armel build isn't a long term issue. > Do any

[fedora-arm] Announcement: livecd-tools v24.2 and appliance-tools v008.0 (also, new maintainer and plans!)

Hello all, Some of you may have already noticed, but for those who haven't, livecd-tools and appliance-tools have a new maintainer now. I took over the Fedora packages and the appliance-tools repository in December, and formally took over the livecd-tools repository a few weeks ago. ## New

[fedora-arm] Re: Fedora Server image - where is newaliases

On Sat, Feb 4, 2017 at 9:15 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > I am building a Fedora Server image. As such, I am modifying the > /etc/aliases file and need to run newaliases. I am use to that always being > part of a Centos base image, it is not in the Fedora Server base