Re: [art] marketing blog

2010-01-26 Thread Florian Effenberger
Hi Christoph, I guess we should move this discussion to d...@marketing, thus setting Reply-to header. :) Christoph Noack wrote on 2010-01-25 23.19: Exactly. One giant planet with all topics and - for visitors with different needs - some sub-sets which cover one topic, e.g. marketing or UX.

Re: [art] OpenOffice.org Logo

2010-01-26 Thread Dr. Bernhard Dippold
Hi Andy, * Andy wrote: Hi Bernhard, If I can get the graphic by the first of May we will be in good shape. If there is not one available by then I will just use the standard OO.o 3 logo. This time might be appropriate - we'll see... Also the aspect ratio needs to be 5385 X 2265 to make

Re: [art] OpenOffice.org Logo

2010-01-26 Thread Brian Coale
Hi all! Andy wrote: Also the aspect ratio needs to be 5385 X 2265 to make the final image sharp on the banner. just my 2 cents: I would recommend NOT using this size until a final proof, or near-final proof is being made. Otherwise we'll be mucking up the OOo server and emails with

Re: [art] OpenOffice.org Logo

2010-01-26 Thread Andy Brown
Brian Coale wrote: Hi all! Andy wrote: Also the aspect ratio needs to be 5385 X 2265 to make the final image sharp on the banner. just my 2 cents: I would recommend NOT using this size until a final proof, or near-final proof is being made. Otherwise we'll be mucking up the OOo

Re: [art] OpenOffice.org Logo

2010-01-26 Thread Brian Coale
Hello Andy, all, On 1/26/2010 4:19 PM, Andy Brown wrote: I only note the aspect ratio as that is what the companies web site say is needed for a banner the size I am looking at. Not being a graphic designer all I can do is pass on the information. Absolutely understandable. My comment was more