Since 11.0, DNSBL has stopped working for me (unless it was moved until
after Bayesian). ValidateRBL is on.
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
Since 11.0, DNSBL has stopped working for me (unless it was moved until
after Bayesian). ValidateRBL is on.
Actually nevermind, it does seem to be working. Setting RBL Logging to
verbose does bring up the ...
Jan-17-08 08:22:43 Commencing DNSBL checks on xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
Jan-17-08 08:22:43
I've been looking into the SPF timeout issues. I've noticed that even with
the alarm timeout set to 10 seconds it appears that in some cases the SPF
query runs for up to 20 seconds before the timeout returns.
The nice thing about the Mail:SPF module is it can be passed a customized
DNS
A well known drug, starting with c which is a proper substring of 'special'
concatenated with 'ist' needs a \b marker to start the match string
A 4 letter german word equivalent to the english acromym from For unlawful
carnal knowledge -- it has an 'i' where the english has a 'u'
This word
--On Thursday, January 17, 2008 10:24:50 -0600 Craig Schmitt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| - We should also consider changing the default retrans = 5 and retry = 4
| for the SPF DNS resolver. In my opinion 4 tries x 5 seconds = 20 seconds
| and that's an eternity for one DNS lookup. I'm
and after all that they softfail anything else...
But that's exactly my point. Spending up to 20 seconds on each lookup could
take forever if DNS is slow or failing. In that case I'd prefer to have no
SPF result at all.
4 lookups? --- you should be so lucky... I think this may be the worst
thanks, I know, it is fixed again. I changed the code base, so it
slipped in again.
fritz
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
