Craig Schmitt wrote:
It's in there... Take a look at Mail::SPF::Server-select_record() where DNS
is queried first for SPF type records and then falls back to TXT records if
none are found.
Yep, and I get it. I'm only referring to actual assp.pl code that takes
actions based on type TXT
Micheal Espinola Jr wrote:
Again, fair enough. Lets forget I ever mentioned SPF and just
concentrate on the bit that SPF and TXT records should be
used/checked/etc synonymously.
It's in there... Take a look at Mail::SPF::Server-select_record() where DNS
is queried first for SPF type records
Craig Schmitt wrote:
That's in the package that performs RBL lookups, which doesn't rely on any
SPF mechanism (or SPF records).
Again, fair enough. Lets forget I ever mentioned SPF and just
concentrate on the bit that SPF and TXT records should be
used/checked/etc synonymously.
The interface says that Default is 5 minutes.
Non-default Settings says it has to be 1 minute
Embargo Time (DelayEmbargoTime)
Enter the number of minutes for which delivery, related with new 'triplet'
(IP address of the sending host + mail from + rcpt to), is refused with a
temporary failure.
ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
schreibt:
Thanks,
And no it is time to go to your boss and tell him, that there are
costs involved with software., even if you make money with it.
-
This SF.net
Hi Fritz,
It is working
Thanks,
JP
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/
--On Tuesday, January 29, 2008 10:12:43 -0500 Micheal Espinola Jr
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| last unless $type eq 'TXT'
Precisely what it says :-) If this is a TXT record keep looking
That code fragment is in in decode_packet, it means we havn't got a
satisfactory answer yet because we're
--On Tuesday, January 29, 2008 12:10:34 +0100 JP van Melis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| I can't implement it, but behind the else, the code should look for
| stmpDestinationRT and if it exists only bind to the interfaces that are
| listed there.
That's an incomplete specification, as one may
Fair enough if that's how it works, but I did notice bits of ASSP's
code that performed functions against specific type of record found,
and type SPF was not synonimous with TXT.
we do not perform functions against spf (txt) records.
Maybe it's just me, but it seems the behavior for extreme scoring, and
the export file, has changed a few times - and since it's been a while
since I looked at the PB config section it looks like it changed again
during one of the revisions. Does the wiki describe the current
operation
Daniel L. Miller wrote:
Maybe it's just me, but it seems the behavior for extreme scoring, and
the export file, has changed a few times - and since it's been a while
since I looked at the PB config section it looks like it changed again
during one of the revisions. Does the wiki describe
Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
we do not perform functions against spf (txt) records.
OK, if not specifically for SPF - what about the code at line number
~13151 (sub decode_packet)? Specifically:
last unless $type eq 'TXT';
IIRC, I saw 5 or 6 lines that involved TXT records.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schreibt:
I need to re-phrase that. The wiki PB section doesn't address the
extreme or export options - so I'll ask if there IS current
documentation on this?
The GUI describes it.
-
This SF.net email
--On 29 January 2008 19:36 +0100 Fritz Borgstedt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are we now in a situation, where people ask for documentation of
versions in development?
Naturally. You asked on the public forum that people try 1.3.5 as it is
production ready; their testing will only be more
At
the moment, each incremental change in 1.3.5 is almost like
opening a wrapped surprise present from a good friend - we
expect it to be something wonderful, but we don't know what's inside.
I like the times I open it and say:
What the hell is this? I hope it came with a gift
Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
Other than what's in the web interface, holding your breath may
result
in passing out. ;-)
Are we now in a situation, where people ask for documentation of
versions in development?
Amazing.
Whether it be formal documentation - or at least a summary of
Other than what's in the web interface, holding your breath may
result
in passing out. ;-)
Are we now in a situation, where people ask for documentation of
versions in development?
Amazing.
-
This SF.net email is
Daniel L. Miller wrote:
I need to re-phrase that. The wiki PB section doesn't address the
extreme or export options - so I'll ask if there IS current
documentation on this?
Other than what's in the web interface, holding your breath may result
in passing out. ;-)
signature.asc
Patrick Neill wrote:
Let them sue each other. US Patents don't apply in the rest of the world.
I wasn't implying that it did. But it may effect some of us soon, while
others later - if never.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
19 matches
Mail list logo
