Re: [Assp-test] Antwort: Segment fault in ASSP version 2.0.2(3.2.29) under Perl 5.12.4

2011-10-06 Thread Anders Westin
Hi Thomas Many questions... Answer is below in your questions Linux kernel asspuser@smtp01:~# uname -a Linux semotsmtp01 2.6.32-5-686 #1 SMP Fri Sep 9 20:51:05 UTC 2011 i686 GNU/Linux Debian Dist Debian GNU/Linux 6.0 \n \l Perlprocess after 13 hour PID USERPR NI VIRT RES SHR S

[Assp-test] Antwort: Re: Antwort: Segment fault in ASSP version 2.0.2(3.2.29) under Perl 5.12.4

2011-10-06 Thread Thomas Eckardt
*stack size (kbytes, -s) 8192 What is your assp-setting for 'ThreadStackSize' ? set it to 32 if it is 0 (your system default 8192) or change *stack size in ulimit to 32 MB Thomas Von:Anders Westin anders.wes...@dometic.se An: ASSP development mailing list

Re: [Assp-test] Antwort: Re: Antwort: Segment fault in ASSP version 2.0.2(3.2.29) under Perl 5.12.4

2011-10-06 Thread Anders Westin
Hi Thomas I changed it to 32 as it was 0, and will see if it helps Thanks /Anders From: Thomas Eckardt thomas.ecka...@thockar.com To: ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net Date: 2011-10-06 08:28 Subject:[Assp-test] Antwort: Re: Antwort: Segment fault

[Assp-test] VRFY in localdomains

2011-10-06 Thread Michael Thomas
Hi, I am trying to avoid maintaining and keeping in sync multiple valid domain lists. I have been testing the use of VRFY in localdomains. I do have it working in the classic example: mydomain.ext=n.n.n.n:port I understand that having multiple MTA destinations, I might want to specify:

Re: [Assp-test] VRFY in localdomains

2011-10-06 Thread GrayHat
I understand that having multiple MTA destinations, I might want to specify: mydomain.ext=n.n.n.n:port|otherdomain.ext=n2.n2.n2.n2:port First of all, if you have multiple domains, it would be a good idea entering in localdomains something like file:files/localdomains.txt and then filling up

[Assp-test] Antwort: VRFY in localdomains

2011-10-06 Thread Thomas Eckardt
Michael, you have to specify the VRFY for every domain separately. you can do someting like that *.mydom.org= to include all sub domains of mydom.org - this is very restictive, I know! BUT - there is a nice feature in V2 - the Group definition. go to 'Groups', define a file and fill in

Re: [Assp-test] Antwort: Re: Antwort: Segment fault in ASSP version 2.0.2(3.2.29) under Perl 5.12.4

2011-10-06 Thread Anders Westin
Hi Thomas I think I have an ide what´s happening I saw today just before ASSP died it used about 2.8 Gb memory can it be the problem that Linux runs out of memory ? As I use Debian 6 32 Bit with out Bigmem option I can only allocate 3Gb Ram. is it normal that ASSP uses so much memory? Here is

Re: [Assp-test] VRFY in localdomains

2011-10-06 Thread Michael Thomas
Grayhat, if I'm not wrong, if you don't specify the =ip:port and you checked the DoVRFY option, ASSP will use the smtpDestination server to run the VRFY; HAAH! That was the obvious thing I was missing. Don't do anything. YES! Check DOVRFY and leave localdomains and localaddresses blank.

[Assp-test] Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Segment fault in ASSP version 2.0.2(3.2.29) under Perl 5.12.4

2011-10-06 Thread Thomas Eckardt
is it normal that ASSP uses so much memory? depends !? If you don't use a database for the main hashes and they are realy large - YES. If you configure a large number of Workers - YES. (typical 5 - for havy load 7 - never more than 10) How is the memory usage after a completed startup?

Re: [Assp-test] Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Segment fault in ASSP version 2.0.2(3.2.29) under Perl 5.12.4

2011-10-06 Thread Anders Westin
Hi Thomas Workers = 5 Database is MYSQL Approx 270 Mb direct after start From: Thomas Eckardt thomas.ecka...@thockar.com To: ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net Date: 2011-10-06 15:07 Subject:[Assp-test] Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Segment

Re: [Assp-test] Antwort: VRFY in localdomains

2011-10-06 Thread Michael Thomas
Thomas, Thanks for the Group hint you have to specify the VRFY for every domain separately. Well, that was what I thought, but was trying to avoid. I was thinking that for DOVRFY, you had to specify VRFY MTA. Grayhat's hint worked. Check DOVRFY and leave localdomains and localaddresses

Re: [Assp-test] Antwort: Segment fault in ASSP version 2.0.2(3.2.29) under Perl 5.12.4

2011-10-06 Thread Thomas Eckardt
Seems to be normal. Please check the connection count one hour after a restart - tell me the count and the memory usage. Thomas Von:Anders Westin anders.wes...@dometic.se An: ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net Datum: 06.10.2011 15:15 Betreff:Re:

Re: [Assp-test] Antwort: VRFY in localdomains

2011-10-06 Thread GrayHat
Check DOVRFY and leave localdomains and localaddresses blank. Tested. Works. Warning; leaving localdomains/localaddresses blank may have some undesired effect on the no spoofing since leaving those blank won't allow ASSP to know which domains/IPs are local !

Re: [Assp-test] Antwort: Segment fault in ASSP version 2.0.2(3.2.29) under Perl 5.12.4

2011-10-06 Thread Anders Westin
Hi Thomas After 1 Hour it looks like this SMTP Connections Received: 1976 SMTP Connections Accepted: 1976 Top PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEMTIME+ COMMAND 5152 asspuser 20 0 904m 663m 5512 S4 21.8 15:09.16 perl /Anders From: Thomas Eckardt

Re: [Assp-test] Antwort: VRFY in localdomains

2011-10-06 Thread Michael Thomas
Grayhat, Spoofing works via VRFY/Ldaplist. Michael Thomas Mathbox 978-687-3300 Toll Free: 1-877-MATHBOX (1-877-628-4269) On 10/6/2011 9:29 AM, GrayHat wrote: Check DOVRFY and leave localdomains and localaddresses blank. Tested. Works. Warning; leaving localdomains/localaddresses blank

[Assp-test] fixes in assp 2.1.2 build 11278

2011-10-06 Thread Thomas Eckardt
Hi all, fixed in 2.1.2 build 11278: - the SPF check for local and outgoing mails was not working changed: 'SPFLocal','Local and outgoing mail SPF Validation' 'Enable Sender Policy Framework Validation for local and outgoing messages also. Don't forget to configure your DNS-server for SPF

[Assp-test] fixes in assp 2.1.2 build 11278

2011-10-06 Thread Thomas Eckardt
I'm sorry - 2.1.2 build 11279 is right Thomas Von:Thomas Eckardt thomas.ecka...@thockar.com An: ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net Datum: 06.10.2011 20:10 Betreff:[Assp-test] fixes in assp 2.1.2 build 11278 Hi all, fixed in 2.1.2 build 11278:

[Assp-test] ASSP v1 1.9.1.7 (0.0.03)

2011-10-06 Thread TR Shaw
Ever since the update late yesterday all saving of file in spam, discarded, etc have stopped yet the config file is the same. What should I do? Is there a new setting? Tom -- All the data continuously generated in your