This check is done per default to prevent your MTA from sending this
message to the foreign BCC recipients.
Check the header of such a mail and you'll find a foreign BCC recipient.
Any of the next releases will have a more detailed output for this
blocking.
Thomas,
The recipient was not foreign. If the recipient is/was on the To: field,
the message is accepted for that recipient, but not if the same
recipient is in the Bcc.
Michael Thomas
Mathbox
978-687-3300
Toll Free: 1-877-MATHBOX (1-877-628-4269)
On 10/11/2011 2:16 AM, Thomas Eckardt wrote:
LocalAddresses_Flat is ALL=208.69.48.43:125
localDomains is ALL=208.69.48.43:125
LocalAddresses_Flat is blank (uses smtpDestination)
Doing this on empty files is useless.
LocalAddresses_Flat is ALL=208.69.48.43:125
Doing this if 'LocalAddresses_Flat' contains no domain entry is (logical
!!)
Thomas,
LocalAddresses_Flat is blank (uses smtpDestination)
Doing this on empty files is useless.
The LocalAddresses_Flat field was blank. With DoVRFY checked, the
default operation is to use smtpDestination to do VRFY. This has been
confirmed by testing.
LocalAddresses_Flat is
Is it possible to create a bombre on the following:
I=A0am=A0Aisha=A0Gaddafi=A0one=A0of=A0the=A0daughters=A0of=A0Muammar=A0G
add=
Or
Inbsp;amnbsp;Aishanbsp;Gaddafinbsp;onenbsp;of=
nbsp;thenbsp;daughtersnbsp;ofnbsp;Muammarnbsp;Gaddafi
All I can come up with is the following, but it doesn't work
Hi Thomas
I have two feature requests for ASSP
1.A button in the GUI to try to download/check for the latest version of
ASSP.
2.Send a mail alert to a given mail address if any worker thread is
detected as stuck.
/Anders
Hi
ASSP version 2.1.2(11283)
Today i started to see MailLoopOK (stuck) , I have two threads hanged
right now one 7911 s and the other 720 s, and I can´t see any abnormal in
the log
/Anders
Hi
I´ve found out it´s connected to one IP address, starts a debug on this to
see what's happening.
/Anders
Hi
ASSP version 2.1.2(11283)
Today i started to see MailLoopOK (stuck) , I have two threads hanged
right now one 7911 s and the other 720 s, and I can´t see any abnormal in
the
use the decoded version of the text - assp decodes all MIME and HTML
encodings in a mail before doing a regex (for human reading).
=A0 = nbsp; = space or \s
so simply search for
I am addafi one of the daughters of Muammar
so at least simply display the mail in your client and copy and
1.A button in the GUI to try to download/check for the latest version of
ASSP.
change 'autoupdate' to 'download and install' will force a low priority
download and install of the latest version
2.Send a mail alert to a given mail address if any worker thread is
detected as stuck.
use the
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Eckardt [mailto:thomas.ecka...@thockar.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2011 11:41 AM
To: ASSP development mailing list
Subject: [Assp-test] Antwort: Bombre syntax
use the decoded version of the text - assp decodes all MIME and HTML
encodings in a
I am not sure I understand. Or more importantly, perhaps I misunderstood
the purpose of ALL=x.x.x.x.
The GUI shows:
localdomains:
You can use an entry like ALL=vrfyhost:port to define a VRFY host
for all entries ( better use Groups ).
which means 'all entries' in localdomain - the
ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net writes:
With DoVRFY checked, the
default operation is to use smtpDestination to do VRFY. This has been
confirmed by testing.
Sorry, but I do not know such a default.
Fritz,
Is DoVRFY (verify with MTA) an alternative to LDAP? If not, what is the
purpose of DoVRFY?
Michael Thomas
Mathbox
978-687-3300
Toll Free: 1-877-MATHBOX (1-877-628-4269)
On 10/11/2011 12:05 PM, Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
ASSP development mailing listassp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net writes:
Fritz,
Is DoVRFY (verify with MTA) an alternative to LDAP? If not, what is
the
purpose of DoVRFY?
DoVRFY is one of multiple validation methods,
the others are LocalAddresses_Flat and DoLDAP.
Lookup will look into
-
Fritz,
My understanding is that, when using DoVRFY, it is an option that one
can specify a MTA which should perform the VRFY. It is also my
understanding that it is optional, not required to specify an MTA which
should perform the VRFY.
Michael Thomas
Mathbox
978-687-3300
Toll Free:
Fritz,
My response was not clear, even to me. Sorry. Let me try again.
My understanding is that, when using DoVRFY, it is an option that one
can specify, in LocalAddresses_Flat, a domain and a MTA which should
perform the VRFY. It is also my understanding that it is optional, not
required to
ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net writes:
It is also my
understanding that it is optional, not required to specify an MTA
which
should perform the VRFY.
That is not my understanding. The MTA is requrired. In V1 was a way
to set the default MTA by setting
ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net writes:
My understanding is that, when using DoVRFY, it is an option that one
can specify, in LocalAddresses_Flat, a domain and a MTA which should
perform the VRFY. It is also my understanding that it is optional,
not
required to
Fritz,
I should have mentioned, that I also have VRFYforceRCPTTO set the same
as smtpDestination, which may be the overriding factor. The MTA does not
do VRFY.
Michael Thomas
Mathbox
978-687-3300
Toll Free: 1-877-MATHBOX (1-877-628-4269)
On 10/11/2011 3:21 PM, Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
ASSP
ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net writes:
I should have mentioned, that I also have VRFYforceRCPTTO set the
same
as smtpDestination, which may be the overriding factor. The MTA does
not
do VRFY.
VRFYforceRCPTTO will be in effect if a MTA is found in the
domain=MTA
ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net writes:
doesn't use it):
=A0{1,10}=A0{1,10}=A0{1,10}=A0{1,10}=2.5
IMHO the period is missing.
Why do you think, that ASSP is behaving strange here? With which
regex-tester did the regex work?
22 matches
Mail list logo
