with 0.0.07 I confirm the issue
In 0.0.07 a transfer of 1.6MB attachment required 457 seconds (duration) with
inactivity of 12 seconds
(looking at the smtp connection list)
If I downgrade to 1.9.5.0(0.0.13) , a transfer of 1.6MB attachment required 68
seconds in the worst situation.
Starting
ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
schreibt:
in the smtp connection list . Tested 3 times in 1.9.5.0(0.0.13) and
0.0.05
Try 1.9.5.1 (0.0.08)
The new feature mentioned by Thomas is also included:
- In case a resend of a blocked mail from inside a BlockReport, it is
now
as I wrote earlier, I mounted the tmpDB directory to a RAM-Disk by adding
tmpfs /usr/share/assp/tmpDB tmpfs rw,mode=1777 0 0
to /etc/fstab and reboot
In addition to that, make sure that Use BerkeleyDB for the Hidden
Makrov Model databases (HMMusesBDB) is set to on.
From now on, read/write
thank you 0.0.08 is ok , 60/15 seconds (duration/inactive) to process a 1.6 MB
file , it's ok now.
I re-checked also various maxsize values , and it's works ok too.
And now also gmail receives the correct bounce 552 message exceeds 927.73
kByte (size)
only a note; in case of the sender can't
has baysValencePB_error and spamdberror been removed in latest devs ?
Graziano
Thank you I think it will be useful, especially if someone do not want set
bayesian equal to MessageScoringUpperLimit . Testing it
There is new feature in 1.9.5.0 (0.0.10).
(Needs rebuildspamdb 2.9.5.0)
The
ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
schreibt:
has baysValencePB_error and spamdberror been removed in latest devs ?
Yes, not useful.
--
All the data continuously generated in your IT
ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
schreibt:
only a note; in case of the sender can't anounce the email SIZE, ASSP
is putting the email in
/usr/local/assp/notspam/3-00048.eml (see below i.e.) , why ? .It
stores a only a truncated useless attachment,
Set -Store the
ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
schreibt:
Nov-25-11 07:03:35 id-3-00048 74.125.82.41 d...@gmail.com to:
i...@dk.net info: attachment 'exim_mainlog.tar.gz' found for Level-1;
Nov-25-11 07:03:35 id-3-00048 74.125.82.41 d...@gmail.com to:
i...@dk.net info: 1
and ~ 25 files/sec. are processed now:
Nov-25-11 10:19:43 /usr/share/assp/notspam
Nov-25-11 10:19:43 File Count: 18,129
Nov-25-11 10:19:43 Processing... notspam with 18129 files
Nov-25-11 10:31:39 Imported Files: 18,129
Nov-25-11 10:31:39 Finished in 716 second(s)
note to Thomas... what
I was appreciating baysValencePB_error, no spam at all for days using
baysValencePB to 42 , baysValencePB_error to 10
and messagescoring ; latest hours (since I started latest version without
baysValencePB_error)
four spam passed without change settings. Without baysValencePB_error I need to
what about adding an average is N files/sec
Who is unable to calculate that aproximatly should not use ASSP.
Thomas
Von:GrayHat gray...@gmx.net
An: ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
Datum: 25.11.2011 14:52
Betreff:Re: [Assp-test] SOLVED: best
Hi Thomas. But I read the GUI.
1) Schedule Cron time for ASSP Restart (ReStartSchedule) has the
value: noschedule
2) Interval for RebuildSpamdb (DoRebuildSpamdb) has the value: 4
(every four hours). And I'm receiving the SpamReuild Report regulary.
3) Restart Timeout (RestartEvery) had value
( ASSP version 2.1.1(11278) / Perl 5.10.1 / FreeBSD 7.2-Release )
11278 does not support 'noschedule' (GUI???) in 'ReStartSchedule' - leave
it blank. Has you done a assp downgrade ?
Thomas
Von:Francisco Miralha da Silveira f...@gramadosite.com.br
An:
13 matches
Mail list logo
