Seems to be missing a quote before the semicolon on line:
$EmailAdrRe
Doug
--
Ben Franklin quote:
Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary
Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.
Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
In what line?
Line 141
Doug
--
Ben Franklin quote:
Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary
Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.
--
FREE DOWNLOAD -
Spyros Tsiolis wrote:
I would like to have a pc with an account that all messages
marked as spam or discarded by ASSP can routed there.
It's under Copy Spam/Ham
Doug
--
Ben Franklin quote:
Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary
Safety, deserve
Spyros Tsiolis wrote:
Can I also have the option to explicitly state_which_ users/accounts
(e-mails : e.g.u...@domain.com) are allowed to tell ASSP which
That would be a few fields down on the page:
Copy Spam to these Recipients Only* / (ccSpamFilter)
/Restricts Copy Spam to these
Rusty Nejdl wrote:
that account has dropped off dramatically
I wouldn't suggest it.
I did a test when we first started using ASSP. I needed some spam
accounts setup to feed the database, so I used a fake spam account name
that ASSP watched, started clicking all of those unsubscribe links and
Charles Marcus wrote:
we use simple email templates in their
templates folder
Now THAT'S an idea. Thanks!!
Doug
--
Ben Franklin quote:
Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary
Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.
Hill, Brett wrote:
Just happened to look at the Maillog tail in the GUI at the right time
to notice a whole bunch of entries like this:
Aug-24-10 12:23:29 Saving ldap records;
Aug-24-10 12:23:30 Saving ldap records;
This seems to have been fixed it 0.0.07
Doug
--
Ben
I've got two machines that send me daily reports. They are getting
flagged by the SaneSecurity signatures, so I went into assp and
specified the two addresses that I don't want to be scanned.
But, ASSP is still scanning them. Am I missing something?
Version info: ASSP Version:
Doug Lytle wrote:
Do Not Scan Messages from these IPs* /(noScanIP)/
http://drdos.info:5/#noScanIP
That copy paste didn't work as expected. It was supposed to be a field
showing the two ip addresses
Doug
--
Ben Franklin quote:
Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase
Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
Should be fixed in 1.7.1.5(1.0.16)
Thanks Fritz, that did it!
Doug
--
Ben Franklin quote:
Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary
Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.
I upgraded to ASSP 1.7.1.4(1.0.04) yesterday. I'm seeing issues where
whitelisted domains are being blocked as blacklisted domains. In the
below sample, sourceforge.net is also on the no processing list: (I
manually hid a portion of my email/domain name)
Apr-23-10 12:30:22 ID: 40218-00686
Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
Did you set these options to your wishes?
Blacklisting Addresses/Domains will overwrite White (DoBlackDomainWL)
Fritz,
Thank you for pointing this out. Both were checked.
Doug
--
Ben Franklin quote:
Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a
Daniel L. Miller wrote:
Yes, ASSP is running under Linux. I just can't get the SSL/TLS
negotiation to work.
I'm currently running ASSP Version: 1.6.2.0(0.0.05)
Modules are all installed via CPAN:
Digest::MD5 2.38 delaying can use MD5 keys for hashes
Email::Valid
Daniel L. Miller wrote:
Anybody have a working ASSP/Postfix SSL configuration who could help me
work this out?
As long as ASSP is running under Linux, yes.
I had it running for around a year on Postfix, now I've moved over to
Zimbra (Postfix backend) with it working as well.
I'm heading
Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
always insert a line with 6 spaces in the end of the file.
After that, any mail with 6 spaces are going to be detected by ALL
regex files.
Can someone running V1 test and confirm this please.
I am unable to produce this behaviour for the current 1.5.1.8
This
Doug Lytle wrote:
This isn't entirely accurate.
In the web interface, when editing a file, it does show 6 spaces on
the last line of the editing window, but it doesn't save them. Small
snapshot below, I'm running 1.5.1.2(4.0.03):
Hmmm.
Looks like attachements aren't allowed though
Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
Are you testing 1.5.1.8 (0.0.06)
No, I thought you were looking for someone that wasn't running the
current to see if it was happening there as well. I can move my home
system to 1.5.1.8 if that's what you're looking for though.
Doug
--
Ben Franklin quote:
Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
schreibt:
No, I thought you were looking for someone that wasn't running the
current to see if it was happening there as well. I can move my home
system to 1.5.1.8 if that's what you're looking for
The question ist not the space in the editor, but if the regex
contains these white spaces.
I see.
What version of 1.5.1.7 do you run. What happened do TLS?
1.5.1.7(0.2.00)
I require TLS on outbound mail, when I moved to 1.5.1.8 (0.0.06) and
typed up what I had found, hitting send failed
Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
OK 1.5.1.8 (0.0.08) should be now back to normal TLS support. Would be
helpful, if you can test it.
Just put it into place, we'll see if this goes.
Doug
--
Ben Franklin quote:
Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary
Safety,
Steve Moss wrote:
Is no-one interested in resolving this issue? It also exists in ASSP
1.5.1.7 and, I suspect, in ASSP 2.0.0.
Steve,
Fritz said this on the 19th of April:
We found a problem with the Windows module, which we cannot fix. Unix
up to now was not a problem with
Thomas Eckardt/eck wrote:
Hi all,
if TLS/SSL is not working for you (V2) - do the following:
Has anybody discovered if it's platform dependent? I'm running under
Mandriva Linux (2009.1) with no apparent issues, running 1.5.1.2(4.0.03).
Doug
--
Ben Franklin quote:
Those who would
Thomas Eckardt/eck wrote:
Hi all,
some countries, like Germany, have legal demands, that every company has
to archive every received and sent email for up to 10 years. So my idea
is, to write a V2 plugin (level 2) which stores the MIME content of every
http://www.mailarchiva.com/
Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
Sorry, but I do not know what a Email Interface Domain Name is.
The poster actually CHANGED the default name of the help account from
assphelp to help, so ...?
Actually,
I thought he was saying that the built-in mail interfaces shouldn't be
responding to domains
Jens-Martin Groenne wrote:
OpenSSL 0.9.8e
My system shows that openssl it up to g
openssl-0.9.8g
Doug
--
Ben Franklin quote:
Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary
Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.
Steve Thompson wrote:
I just sent an email to h...@externaldomain.com and ASSP sends me a help
report?
I just tried it and got a bounce back.
Doug
--
Ben Franklin quote:
Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary
Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor
Steve Thompson wrote:
I just tried it and got a bounce back.
Doug
externaldomain.com is the sanitized address.
I assumed. I tried on my domain (Running 1.5.12 (1.07)
Doug
--
Ben Franklin quote:
Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little
Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
ASSP_1.5.1.2-Install.zip is ready to be published on SF.
It would be helpful if this package is tested for correctness:
Looks like the server is having issues.
Tried to download the assp.pl and the zip file. assp.pl link fails with
*Not Found*
Sorry, that is an
Tom Shaw wrote:
http://www.iworld.de/homes/fb/ASSP/S06660E7E.4/assp.pl
You'll need to download it from Sourceforge.
Doug
--
Ben Franklin quote:
Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary
Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.
Tom Shaw wrote:
I have loaded
IO::Socket::INET6 2.56
IO::Socket::SSL 1.19
It's currently at
IO::Socket::SSL 1.23
For Linux at least.
Doug
--
Ben Franklin quote:
Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary
Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.
Steve Thompson wrote:
I'll second that.
I've confirmed, with Fritz's help, that I had the format wrong for
emailing of the block report. In the body of the message:
emailaddr...@domain=toemailaddress=numberofdays.
Doug
--
Ben Franklin quote:
Those who would give up Essential
Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
Should be ok in 1.04
Currently on 1.03, went to grab 1.04, saw that there was 1.06 out there,
did a wget on it. It shows as 1.05 and blockreport is broken on 1.05
broken again.
Doug
--
Ben Franklin quote:
Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a
Steve Thompson wrote:
Global symbol $spfpValencePB requires explicit package name at
C:\ASSP\assp.pl
Same thing under Linux:
Global symbol $spfpValencePB requires explicit package name at
./assp.pl line 8756.
BEGIN not safe after errors--compilation aborted at ./assp.pl line 17061
Doug
GrayHat wrote:
I've tried downloading the zip file but the link
bombs with an error, moreover, trying to d/l
the file using wget here's what I obtain...
I downloaded it last night.
Doug
--
Ben Franklin quote:
Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary
All our replies are being banned as 'bad attachments' Had to roll back
to 1.3.5 (22.6)
Doug
--
Ben Franklin quote:
Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary
Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.
We've got a domain that only has 1 valid email address attached to it.
The domain itself gets large amounts of spam. I thought that I could
use the PenaltyBox to trap the domain with 1 exception. I have the
following:
PenaltyBox Trap Address* (spamtrapaddress)
@somedomain.com
I was running ASSP 1.3.5 (13.17) for well over a month. Today, ASSP
started crashing with the following error:
main exception: Nested quantifiers in regex; marked by -- HERE in
m/9/IP++ -- HERE XJN[EMAIL PROTECTED]: already on|9/IP++XJN[EMAIL
PROTECTED]:
added to/ at ./assp.pl line 8011.
I
Doug Lytle wrote:
I've been running ASSP 1.2.7.9 (0) for quite a while and decided to move
I made a mistake, I thought work and my personal assp installs were the
same, they aren't. We went from 1.3.3 to 1.3.6
Doug
--
Ben Franklin quote:
Those who would give up Essential Liberty
Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
1.3.6 is *not* the next release. It will be the next one after the
next one ))).
To make this clear, I moved 1.3.6 to FutureDevelopment.
That's understood, that's why I joined the assp-test, as you've said in
the past. I just didn't know if it was something stupid
Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
Please run the newest 1.3.5.
Done,
Although the web page describes it as 1.3.5 (13.7) and the script shows
as (13.6)
Doug
--
Ben Franklin quote:
Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary
Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.
Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
Please reload to get (13.7)
Done.
In testing the CC inbound/outbound HAM, I get the following error:
Feb-3-08 13:21:55 CCabort: rcpt Expected 250, got: 501 Syntax error.
Start path name with the delimiter.
(from:[EMAIL PROTECTED] to:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
--
Ben
201 - 241 of 241 matches
Mail list logo
