3 times in 1.9.5.0(0.0.13) and 0.0.05
I always replicated this issue in 0.0.05 , big delays to download attachments .
Graziano
ASSP development mailing listassp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
schreibt:
0.0.05 works better (no more row loops in the logs) however when I
send an attachment from gmail
MByte;
Nov-23-11 13:58:24 id-32207-00291 212.52.84.110 d...@libero.it error: message
exceeds maxSize 95000 bytes (size)!;
note I have gmail.com set in maxSMTPdomainIPWL and strictSPFRe
Graziano
--
All the data continuously
all the 3 tests were done setting maxSizeExternal to 95 (not maxSize as I
wrote in my last message)
--
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure
contains a definitive record of customers,
with 1.9.5.1(0.0.00) same behavior of (0.0.13) .
ASSP development mailing listassp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
schreibt:
1.9.5.0(0.0.13)
Do not use that version.
--
All the data continuously generated in your IT
I also noticed that the bounced email contains this
The error that the other server returned was: 500 500 Mail appears to be
unsolicited -- send error reports to r...@hostnamey.net (state 18).
instead of the maxSizeError , 552 message exceeds MAXSIZE byte (size)
Graziano
and the email contains
250 MB bytes (1 byte more) , could be useful
to stop the smtp connection immediately. If it could be possible , ASSP could
save bandwidth,cpu,ram,and reduce number of smtp connections .
Graziano
--
All
subject and score an
user could not be sure that the email is good/spam ,
so a resend only without whitelist could be useful to check if the email is
good or bad .
In other situations the user could find a sure good email blocked and in this
case
a resend and whitelist could be useful.
Graziano
(more than hardware specs, or dns speed), am I right ?
Graziano
--
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure
contains a definitive record of customers, application performance,
security threats
I am receiving a lot of
Possible Mailloop: Headerlength (50087) 5;
and no spam found or message ok at all (scoring not working)
Graziano
--
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure
contains
1.9.5.0(0.0.13) instead seems to work ok
I am receiving a lot of
Possible Mailloop: Headerlength (50087) 5;
and no spam found or message ok at all (scoring not working)
Graziano
--
All the data
Revision 1.424 ? Because it contains 1.9.1.9(1.0.00) instead of 1.9.5.0
(0.0.15) and there is no spamdberror
Graziano
ASSP development mailing listassp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
schreibt:
probably is better to use spamdberror only to assign positive
X-Assp-Score scores
(avoiding negative
([scoring:-9] Bayesian Reports Probability: 0.)
probably is better to use spamdberror only to assign positive X-Assp-Score
scores
(avoiding negative scores which are making passing more spam than usual) .
Graziano
There is new feature in 1.9.5.0 (0.0.10).
(Needs rebuildspamdb 2.9.5.0
Thank you I think it will be useful, especially if someone do not want set
bayesian equal to MessageScoringUpperLimit . Testing it
There is new feature in 1.9.5.0 (0.0.10).
(Needs rebuildspamdb 2.9.5.0)
The spam/ham reports will be used to build a second spamdb called
spamdberror.
A second
uniqeIDLogging is no more in the logging menu
Graziano
--
RSA(R) Conference 2012
Save $700 by Nov 18
Register now
http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1
___
Assp-test mailing
the MessageScoringUpperLimit is still not reached.
Could it be possible to add an additional bayesian score only for the email
reported
to assp-spam@ , so that the email will be surely blocked after an assp-spam@
report ?
Graziano
--
RSA(R
(smtpDestination) -
Message sent;
and I do not receive the email . Any idea which could be the cause ?
Thank you
Graziano
--
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a
definitive record
.
Graziano
ok I'll try it
Graziano
ASSP development mailing listassp-test@lists.sourceforge.net writes:
Since
what version did it start?
It would be very helpful if everybody who wants to help debugging ASSP
V1 uses
http://assp.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/assp/assp/assp.pl?view=log and
run
score for IP
'67.228.184.145' is now -130;
Graziano
--
Doing More with Less: The Next Generation Virtual Desktop
What are the key obstacles that have prevented many mid-market businesses
from deploying virtual desktops
problem exists also in 0.0.07 , however this time it stopped at -22 (?)
Sep-12-11 03:37:32 id-31581-7 65.54.190.38 suraj5...@hotmail.com to:
e...@ha.com [scoring:-2] -- Home Country Bonus for 'US (Microsoft Hosting)' --
[FW];
Sep-12-11 03:37:32 id-31581-7 65.54.190.38
it does not happen only with home country bonus
Sep-12-11 03:49:42 id-31581-00093 216.32.181.186
gso.servicebullet...@gilbarco.com to: d...@s.com added 8 (suspicious HELO:
'ch1outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com'), total score for this message is now
10;
Sep-12-11 03:49:42 id-31581-00093
ok I'll try it
Graziano
ASSP development mailing listassp-test@lists.sourceforge.net writes:
Since
what version did it start?
It would be very helpful if everybody who wants to help debugging ASSP
V1 uses
http://assp.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/assp/assp/assp.pl?view=log and
run versions
Now I have seen a problem in bombDataRe when using file:files/bombdatare.txt
If I edit the file and add or remove some line in the file, I receive File
saved successfully
, but it's not happening, in fact the new data is not saved .
It happens in 1.7 and 1.8 too .
Graziano
ASSP development
the changes are not saved and the 3 lines above returns .
Listing /files folder I have seen ASSP is saving the file in this way
bombdatare.txt\
while all other files are save in this way
blockreport.txt
without the \ at the end of name file
Probably it's an issue on linux only.
Graziano
ASSP
subject i.e. ?
How to score the message if the email body contains only a link ?
Thank you
Graziano
--
Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports
standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1, ECMAScript5
no it does not work too
now ASSP freezes here
Sep-27-10 02:12:27 166.104.142.30 jhaas...@ralphmlee.com.au to: ji...@mn.com
[spam found] -- bombSubjectRe: 'Refil' -- [46Your Refill order 743467Your
Special Order 54980] - /usr/local/assp/discarded/4664.eml;
now I am using
ok trying
Gabriel
ASSP development mailing listassp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
schreibt:
with DoBombSubjectRe set to block .
Set bombSubjectReMaxHits to 1.
--
Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual
above is spamming the word , a
lot of servers are receiving this spam
during latest 24 hours .
Currently the only solution I have found is stopping and restarting ASSP ,
however if the email returns , the problem repeats.
Thank you
Graziano
It's not a solution because it's changing subject I received another with a
new subject
Sep-27-10 00:03:52 111.254.198.125 jmeeks...@bse.com.uy to: su...@jdweb.net
[spam found] -- bombSubjectRe: 'Refil' -- [ial Order 526096Special order
763431Special order ] -
in my current ASSP I don't have preHeaderRe .. arghh
I think bombHeaderRe could be to late, because the header is already too
large (compromized) - if it works ok - else (better) use preHeaderRe. This
will stop the mail at the point, where the line
Subject: 53Your Priotiy Refill Order
now I am using
bombSubjectRe:=Refill Order|Special order|Priotiy
with DoBombSubjectRe set to block .
It seems to work (waiting to double verify it) , spammer blocked without
causing the ASSP freeze
Gabriel
in my current ASSP I don't have preHeaderRe .. arghh
I think bombHeaderRe
URIBLServiceProvider:=dbl.spamhaus.org|multi.surbl.org|black.uribl.com|dob.sibl.support-intelligence.net|uribl.swinog.ch
URIBLmaxreplies:=5
URIBLmaxhits:=2
URIBLmaxtime:=6
URIBLsocktime:=2
Graziano
Hello
I have gripValencePB:=8 however in logs I have seen this
May-17-10 14:21:23 130.117.72.123 n...@nt.se.com to: h...@dp.com added -4
(130.117.72 in griplist (0.13)), total score for this message is now -1;
Should it not be added -8 , instead of added -4 ?
Thank you
Graziano
ok I understood , thank you
ASSP development mailing listassp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
schreibt:
Hello
I have gripValencePB:=8 however in logs I have seen this
May-17-10 14:21:23 130.117.72.123n...@nt.se.com to: h...@dp.com added
-4
(130.117.72 in griplist (0.13)), total score for
it be possible to have a
Unofficial Virus Infected (SpamVirusLogUnoff)
in addiction to Virus Infected (SpamVirusLog) ?
(or a collect in spam folder only Unofficial added in SpamVirusLog select)
Graziano
to be having a collect in spam folder only
Unofficial added in SpamVirusLog selection
Graziano
No-Blocking Virus Scan Scoring Regex** (SuspiciousVirus) is meant to
do that.
Did you put UNOFFICIAL
I tried 1.7.5.0(1.0.00) and it works , Scoring and collection in
/usr/local/assp/spam/ folder , thank you
Graziano
ASSP development mailing listassp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
schreibt:
even if I put UNOFFICIAL in SuspiciousVirus, the spam is treated as
virus (because detected
email should appear
Address it to assps...@mydomain.com and click send.
Graziano
--
___
Assp-test mailing list
Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
https
detected: 'Sanesecurity.Junk.4318.UNOFFICIAL' -- [Give
us a call to get a diploma];
SuspiciousVirus is working correctly because it's scoring the message ,
but the message is blocked and is not collected in /spam folder (such as
all [spam found] messages).
Graziano
ASSP development mailing
)
Before receiving the seg fault I waited about 3 minutes (!).
(Always related with SPF usage , in other servers I am seeing also a lot
of SPF temp errors too , which creates a lot of delays (I reported this
problem some week ago)
in ASSP .)
Graziano
ok just to report, I blocked the ip/email too .
Regarding SPF temp errors, does exist a solution to skip the big time
delay caused by SPF temp errors (this problem seems to be very common)?
Graziano
ASSP development mailing listassp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
schreibt:
Apr-23-10 12:21
Hello
suppose I want collect to myem...@myemail.com all in/out email for one
or more domain
on the server . Is it possible using ASSP (it seems no) ?.
Graziano
--
Download Intel#174; Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new
whitelisting for domain not working at all, because ASSP is
searching
for _ALL_ entries in whitelist and not _all_ .
Graziano
--
Download Intel#174; Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling
I know , but I wrote only to report the problem (someone could use WHITE
i.e. and it will not work)
ASSP development mailing listassp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
schreibt:
wildcardUser
Use * or _all_.
--
Hello
could it possible have an option to apply all ASSP spam checks if a
sender passes
successfully delaying/greylisting ?
Graziano
--
Download Intel#174; Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself
.
Graziano
ASSP development mailing listassp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
schreibt:
could it possible have an option to apply all ASSP spam checks if a
sender passes
successfully delaying/greylisting ?
Sorry, but I do not get it. Please explain more in detail
unluckly it's not related , AutoReloadCfg is disabled. The problem
happens when I send a kill HUP pid
signal .
Graziano
Graziano wrote:
I have a big issue with 1.7.1 .
Several clients are reporting that randomly ASSP executes a
Apr-01-10 21:57:01 Reloading config;
after
Hello
I am seeing this problem on more than one server , is there any way to
avoid the
big delay caused by an SPF temperror ?
Graziano
Hello
in a server where DNS is fast I have seen following issue .
Each time the server was receiving email from the sender below (where
only the first
config ?
Graziano
--
Download Intel#174; Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel
Reloading config ?
Graziano
--
Download Intel#174; Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel
from other email were processed immediately .
Which could cause this issue ?
Graziano
--
Download Intel#174; Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine
Hello
in 1.7.1 I am seeing a lot of
rejected by AllowLocalRe
what is it please ?
Thank you
Graziano
--
Download Intel#174; Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
ok I understood
I put
file:files/allowlocalre.txt'
in AllowLocalAddressesRe
even if the file was empty , ASSP started to reject all with
rejected by AllowLocalRe
Is it normal behavior ?
Happening in 1.7.1.2 1.0.02
Graziano
Hello
in 1.7.1 I am seeing a lot of
rejected by AllowLocalRe
in ASSP 1.7.1.2 1.0.2
sometime in the log I see the scoring point in this way
[scoring:10] -- blackRe:
sometime I don't see the applied score , such below
[scoring] -- blacklisted HELO 'bezqint.net' -- [Hi oscar pms Don t miss
80 Sale];
[scoring] (Message-ID missing);
Graziano
How to allow to pass an email which use test world in the email subject ?
I am using Regular Expression to Identify Non-Spam** /(whiteRe)/
#whiteRe in 1.7.1.2
but it does not work (it does not check the email subject too ?).
Graziano
no it works , please forget, my fault
How to allow to pass an email which use test world in the email subject ?
I am using Regular Expression to Identify Non-Spam** /(whiteRe)/
#whiteRe in 1.7.1.2
but it does not work (it does not check the email subject too ?).
Graziano
to:
cr...@haliden.com [scoring] (PTR missing);
Mar-24-10 12:56:13 203.247.63.94 scleroti...@toutgratuit.com to:
cr...@haliden.com added 6 (PTR missing), total score for IP
'203.247.63.94' is now 84;
Graziano
spamhaus RBL with public DNS like google or openDNS will return all
invalid checks
http://www.spamhaus.org/faq/answers.lasso?section=DNSBL Usage#261
So... if you are using google or openDNS for your ASSP DNS checks , you
may remove spamhaus RBL since it will not work .
Graziano
Hello
latest 2 or 3 weeks I tested google public DNS
http://code.google.com/intl/it/speed/public-dns/
(configured in /etc/resolv.conf) and they are working very well , I
definitely removed openDNS.
Graziano
With openDNS
1) Must have an opeDNS account
2) Possible TOS violations
as blacklisted on any RBL too (I tried different).
I do not understand why ASSP is not blocking the email using the Forged
Helo check .
Graziano
--
Come build with us! The BlackBerryreg; Developer Conference in SF, CA
Hello
could it possible to have in the IP Blocking ASSP menu a
WhiteIgnoreBlocksIP (i.e.) control ?
If selected , when the email sender is whitelisted the sender ip should
NOT be blocked by DropList , DoDenySMTP , DoDenySMTPstrict .
What do you think ?
Graziano
As I know the block at early smtp stage happens only with DoDenySMTPstrict .
So my request was especially for DoDenySMTP (I was not correct
requesting it also
for DoDenySMTPstrict)
Graziano
could it possible to have in the IP Blocking ASSP menu a
WhiteIgnoreBlocksIP (i.e.) control
for me it simply does not resend , the error is not created at all
I tested also (1.2.01) .
Graziano
ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
schreibt:
I continued to have resend issues with 1.5.1.2 with all kinds of
resend errors showing up in the log
on linux too , resend now works (even if I receive the resend after
about 5 minutes).
I'll keep an eye on it.
--
Register Now Save for Velocity, the Web Performance Operations
Conference from O'Reilly Media.
is Net::SSLeay required for 1.5.1.2 too ?
ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
schreibt:
yep, to OpenSSL 0.9.7j
install newest version of .
--
Stay on top of everything new and
in fact, with IO::Socket::SSL 1.24 and OpenSSL 0.9.7j or above you
should not experiencing timeouts, I suppose/think.
Graziano
At 6:53 PM +0200 4/19/09, Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
schreibt:
I'm on OSX running OpenSSL 0.9.7l
I think that all the timeout issues happens when using an old OpenSSL
(openssl 0.9.7j or above should be ok as reported by IO::Socket::SSL
module installation) .
Anyone can verify it (I can't because centos 5 offers 0.9.7e) ?
Graziano
the MTA (exim in my case) timeout problem still exists also in linux and
ASSP 1.5.1.2 (0.1.00)
Currently I'm seeing the error only when the remote sender is using a
Microsoft Exchange Server.
Graziano
--
This SF.net
Hello
I noticed that each time I set the value
griplist in GReyIPlist Database (griplist)
after some event (I have to understand exactly when) ASSP empties
GReyIPlist Database (griplist) value (!).
griplist:=
I'm sure it happens daily .
Graziano
message, ending with . on a line by itself
SMTP writing message and terminating .
LOG: MAIN
==
while in exim maillog I read this
SMTP connection lost after final dot
Graziano
Hello
I have DoDenySMTPstrict set to block . I executed some test (adding my
ips) and
denySMTPConnectionsFromAlways seems to have no effect.
All the ips on denySMTPConnectionsFromAlways are not blocked at all.
Anyone having the same problem ?
Graziano
no I was not correct , it WORKS however I was confused by the log
strictly denied by denySMTPConnections or droplist
I think that
strictly denied by denySMTPConnectionsFromAlways or droplist
could be better
Graziano
Hello
I have DoDenySMTPstrict set to block . I executed some test
Regarding gripValencePB , does it score the message if the griplist value
is greater than ispgripvalue (by default 0.5) ?
Graziano
The gripvalue is used in Bayesian filter and with a special scoring
value: gripValencePB
Hello
the new global stats does not seem to be updated (only 319 servers ?)
regularly.
Graziano
--
___
Assp-test mailing list
Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
https
a griplist value very near 1.
Graziano
--
___
Assp-test mailing list
Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
Hello
with latest rebuildspamdb.pl I received this error
'x' outside of string in unpack at /usr/local/assp/rebuildspamdb.pl line
1157.
This error happened with a new server where /spam and /notspam were
empty , and
ONLY with the first execution (no error after the 2th execution).
Graziano
ok , trying 1.09.
Is changed
--
___
Assp-test mailing list
Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
correction , trying your last
0.08
Is changed
--
___
Assp-test mailing list
Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
I am using recommended settings in collection menu.
Before 1.5.1.0(1.09) I was collecting .eml with content ;
with 1.5.1.0(1.09) only a long list of .eml with no content (size 0).
(Could it be related with DoNotCollectBombs:=1 ?)
Graziano
ASSP development mailing list assp-test
same problem with 1.5.1.1(0.04) . I noticed between all the size 0
messages , some rare
msg containing only QUIT .
Graziano
I am using recommended settings in collection menu.
Before 1.5.1.0(1.09) I was collecting .eml with content ;
with 1.5.1.0(1.09) only a long list of .eml
Hello
since I started to test 1.5.1.0(1.09) ASSP is collecting in the
discarded folder a lot of
email with size 0 . Is it a normal behavior ?
Graziano
--
___
Assp-test
%
os : Linux Centos 4.7
Graziano
--
Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA
-OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise
-Strategies to boost
or all in
hours (perhaps better all in hours) ?
Graziano
--
Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA
-OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise
Hello
the section below was coded specifically for ASSP running on
centos/redhat os *only*;
I think anyone can suggest corrections for other os .
Graziano
foreach my $file (@files) {
# sleeping214
my $count2=($count/300);
if(($count2 =~ /^-?\d+$/) and ($count2!=0) )
{
my $check_sleep
100-300 different lines like these in 2 days.
Graziano
--
Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA
-OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise
::SPF::Query 1.999.1
and
IO::Socket::INET6 2.56
If I force reinstallation the modules they are still not detected
Graziano
ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
schreibt:
The maillog.txt reports that I requested a report not performed an
action to add or remove
please ignore , my fault I think sorry.
Graziano
I am trying 09.10
I think that something is not working with perl module detection.
ASSP 09.10 is returning this
Feb-19-09 11:02:07 IO::Socket::INET6 module = 2.56 required - IPv6
support not available
Feb-19-09 11:02:07 Mail::SPF::Query
per hour from a
single domain.
Graziano
GrayHat gray...@gmx.net schreibt:
sigh ok; would it be possible to have an option to set
a given generation time instead of midnight ? I'm asking so
since, in some cases, a different time may be appropriate
there will be some changes
should not cause overusage of cpu and ram in ASSP
Graziano
ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
schreibt:
1. When I disabled External Attachment Blocking (DoBlockExes), it
stopped
sucking down memory. I had that set to block. Note that I do have
File::Scan
with 04.03 SuspiciousVirus works
Graziano
I am trying now 1.5.1 RC 0.03.06 and it does not seem to work
I put
Sanesecurity|SecuriteInfo
in SuspiciousVirus ; ASSP is still blocking the email instead to assign
the Virus Suspicious Score (25)
when a Sanesecurity or SecuriteInfo email
scoring for malware you may consider to use also their aggressive
clamav list
with more safety. Another reason ; if some new signature list/site come
out ,
now you may put their string in SuspiciousVirus , and you may safer
test it with scoring.
Graziano
maxRealSize ?
( currently maxRealSize is not really useful , why should I block a big
message (bigger than maxRealSize ) if ASSP already
received it fully ? )
Thank you
Graziano
--
Create and Deploy Rich Internet Apps outside
I am trying now 1.5.1 RC 0.03.06 and it does not seem to work
I put
Sanesecurity|SecuriteInfo
in SuspiciousVirus ; ASSP is still blocking the email instead to assign
the Virus Suspicious Score (25)
when a Sanesecurity or SecuriteInfo email is found.
Graziano
ASSP development mailing list
(without blocking) all the clamAV FOUND
lines having Sanesecurity in it
I tried using No-Blocking Virus Scoring Regex /(SuspiciousVirus)/
#SuspiciousVirus but as it seems it has no effect in
the Sanesecurity.Spam.7935.UNOFFICIAL string .
Thank you
Graziano
.
Graziano
--
Create and Deploy Rich Internet Apps outside the browser with Adobe(R)AIR(TM)
software. With Adobe AIR, Ajax developers can use existing skills and code to
build responsive, highly engaging applications
which version please ?
Graziano
As can you see there is no ip , no message ID , and no sender email . Is
it normal ?
It happens only with clamAV
I am running ClamAV and mine is fine. Nothing is missing in the log.
Steve T
For me the countrary , 95% without ip and email , 5% complete with ip
and from email.
(I am using sanesecurity and other unofficial clamd signatures)
Graziano
I see the same at times but they are just null senders to stop mail
loops. I see plenty with valid mail from's.
Tom
Hello
in fact ScanCC was on .. ok thank you I will try in this way
Graziano
If you have set Scan Copied Spam Mails (ScanCC) to on, ASSP does an
additional scan after the connection is closed and a copied spam-mail
is send
an ip list (a file field * possibly)
Graziano
Is it possible to have right below Block Local Address from
External
Sender /(DoNoSpoofing)/ #DoNoSpoofing
a field to enter a DoNoSpoofing ip ignore list ?
Should it be an IP list or an any regex list
Hello
Is it possible to have right below Block Local Address from External
Sender /(DoNoSpoofing)/ #DoNoSpoofing
a field to enter a DoNoSpoofing ip ignore list ?
Graziano
--
This SF.net email is sponsored
the message has not been delivered .
Is it the behavior or am I missing something ?
Thank you
Graziano
--
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf
101 - 200 of 238 matches
Mail list logo
