in this case my fault SMTP Status Code Reply Logging /(replyLogging)/
#replyLogging was set to disabled , I set it to default
(enabled - exclude 250 ok)
Graziano
ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
schreibt:
Is it the behavior or am I missing something
Hello
with rebuildspamdb 2.1_3 even if I have some file in
/usr/local/assp/errors/notspam folder
when I execute rebuildspamdb I receive this
./errors/notspam
File Count: 0
Processing...
Imported Files: 0
Finished in 1 second(s)
It's ignoring the folder
Graziano
it works perfectly now .
Graziano
ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
schreibt:
for other folder all ok .
.eml , I moved some invalid email using cp
it does no more accept .eml ?
rebuildspamdb V2 accepted only .rpt in the error folders.
however i
Hello
if I resend an email , is the resent email .eml automatically whitelisted ?
Graziano
--
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf
I understand and I agree (even if some ASSP admin is asking for this
feature as an option, for this reason I reported here)
Graziano
If you have set 'DelResendSpam' and an Admin requests a resend, the
file is moved to 'correctednotspam' - if a user requests the resend,
the file
Hello
a (brief) build changelog could be fantastic . After each build I lose
time to understand what changed or comparing
assp.pl. And your build coming up very soon ;) . Any chance to have it
some place ?
Graziano
).
I would score only these . (Is not this the DoNoSpoofing behavior ?)
Graziano
DoNoSpoofing scoring possibilities and DoNoSpoofing collecting
options .
scoring ??? for what reason ?
If DoNoSpoofing is enabled, local adresses are not allowed - why
should we score/collect them - because
Hello
a feature suggestion ..
DoNoSpoofing scoring possibilities and DoNoSpoofing collecting options .
Happy 2009 to all the ASSP mailing list !
--
___
Assp-test mailing
) and
(inclResendLink)
With thunderbird only way seems to be to copy link and convert
%3C%3C%2Fusr%2Flocal%2Fassp%2Fspam%2F1271%2Eeml%3E%3E%0D%0A
with
/usr/local/assp/spam/1271.eml
by hand
tested on 1.4.4.2.12
Graziano
with 2.12 it works aga in however after clicking
with 2.16 it works perfectly! Thanks!
(even if ASSP does not check for duplicates , such as happens with
whitelist if you add an email already whitelisted)
I tried adding an email on the body , and also a domain , I'm trying
every way .
It's accepted , I receive the email
with the error above . I have seen that the resendmail
folder contains some email which failed . So each about 5 minutes assp
try to resend..
the resend fails , and the bad .eml remains there .
Could it possible to clean the resendmail folder at the end of the
resend process ?
Graziano
- mailfrom: sa...@mydomain.com
mydomain.com is my domain , is an email spoofing
If assp tries to resend no error is reported , however the email remains
on /resendmail
Any solution (since someone could leave antispoofing disabled) ?
Graziano
set MaintenanceLog to verbose - you should see
doing something wrong ?
Thank you
Graziano
--
___
Assp-test mailing list
Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
I tried adding an email on the body , and also a domain , I'm trying
every way .
It's accepted , I receive the email report/notification and no problem
in log is reported ,
but the noprocessing file is not updated at all.
ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
schreibt:
On collecting there is
Virus Infected has the default/recommended discard however the discard
option in drop down is not available.
OKMAIL has Recommended: discard (on description) and ignore on
Click to reset (discard option in drop down is not available at all).
Graziano
ok no prob (BTW because default is 7)
ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
schreibt:
on 1.4.4. 2.1 I can't see logdays , let me check newer
I mean your log *roll* days. You are producing big files with 6 or 7
days in one logfile. Why?
if I can remember the first requirements posted on this mailing list ,
they were
fairly high , while ASSP 1.x on VPS usually run with no problem using
less than 64 MB .
however, yes I have to try it ;)
ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
schreibt:
same problem here
For a better view of this email - please enable html in your client!
and all html tables are not shown
even if I have Thunderbird allowed to show original HTML.
I customized too blockreportusers.txt with a txt only message
Graziano
Hello List,
Sorry about
is it the behavior ?
Thank you
Graziano
--
___
Assp-test mailing list
Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
)
and the possibility to set a limit to the number of asspblocks requests per
hour (from the same domain).
Graziano
--
___
Assp-test mailing list
Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
Are you talking about Message Limit Blocks ?
I have spamfolder sendAllSpam set -
(almost all the email on the list I receive on my asspblock are blocked
by message limit)
ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
schreibt:
In collection I have all the defaults .
ok I think that all my problems was related to
fileLogging
Subject logging
which were disabled
Graziano
(almost all the email on the list I receive on my asspblock are
blocked
by message limit)
Please look into the maillog tail, you will see clearly in red and
green what
Could be added possibility to add as default value the server hostname (
@hostname ) in this field instead of assp-nospam.org ?
Thank you
--
___
Assp-test mailing list
|CP1251
Graziano
--
___
Assp-test mailing list
Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
I do not understand how work this
try to resend this files /(resendmail)/ #resendmail
Should I enter spam here ? So that ASSP could resend the email on spam
collection ?
--
ok I understood ;)
I do not understand how work this
try to resend this files /(resendmail)/ #resendmail
Should I enter spam here ? So that ASSP could resend the email on spam
collection ?
--
load , which on my server seems to
be very high after each asspblock request)
Graziano
--
___
Assp-test mailing list
Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
https
analyzing the other old 5 logfiles ,
saving a lot of server load.
Graziano
Graziano wrote:
When I sent a request to asspblock@ I received this (at the end of message)
340 blocked emails found for i...@my.net in the last 5 days
576188 lines analysed in 3 logfiles on host ASSP.nospam
I think
for me 1.4.4.1.25 does not work/start at all
Anyone having this problem ?
Graziano
--
SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas, Nevada.
The future of the web can't happen without you. Join us
[scoring] (DNSBL: failed, 201.90.9.130 listed by ())
note on the second line listed by is empty .
Graziano
Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
assp-u...@lists.sourceforge.net schreibt:
I noticed that if you use RBL Service Providers in the old way
(without
.
Graziano
Graziano wrote:
hello
when the server (running ASSP) peace.hostname.com sends and email to
another server (running ASSP too) joy.hostname.com , ASSP on
joy.hostname.com returns
a Forged Helo peace.hostname.com . And viceversa if I send an email
from joy. to peace. .
The only way
it's not down for me
Graziano
Hi,
If anyone knows who operates the web server at www.asspsmtp.org, it seems to
be down.
Michael Thomas
Mathbox
978-687-3300
1-877-MATHBOX (Toll Free)
-
This SF.net email
ignores cc: and bcc: , and also on assp
maillog I can see only this
Apr-25-08 07:30:39 77.87.112.37 [EMAIL PROTECTED] to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] local (no bad attachments)
Why assp ignores cc: and bcc: ?
(It seems to happens only sending email myself)
Thanks
Graziano
can
see the
email rejected not only the ip in the assp log) I rarely can see an ip
blocked by denySMTPConnections (I can see 1 ip every 20-25 minutes
instead of 1 ip every 1/3 minute).
Is it normal or there is a problem with denySMTPConnections ?
Thanks
Graziano
This is a test list. I am
/no MX .
For example Mail::CheckUser checks if there any MX records *or* A
records for the domain part of the email address
(while Email::Valid checks if there are MX *and* A records for the email) .
Graziano
ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
schreibt
:-O!
ASSP 1.3.6 is obsolet
introducing ASSP 2.0.0 (0.0) (multithreaded)
Perl 5.8.8-822 is needed
threads 1.69 is needed
-
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services
on google +5
ip not listed on google -5
ip with over n (50?) results on google 0 (probaly it's the ip of a
big company like gmail,yahoo,aol ...)
Graziano
-
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place
and A record , however the ip
91.90.192.230 was added to
MX/A cache . Is it a normal behavior ?
Thanks
Graziano
-
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything
201 - 238 of 238 matches
Mail list logo
