Hi!
Looks like I'll be creating another VM with Debian 32bit.
I bumped the current VM up to 2GB and upgraded again. It's holding steady at
1.7GB.
But under 12057, it was fine.
Are You shue, what in this version rebuildspam worked Ok?
IMHO, rebuildspam process, for example, may be
Victor Miasnikov wrote:
Are You shue, what in this version rebuildspam worked Ok?
It would appear that it's caused by rebuildspam. I've since moved over
to Debian 32bit (Squeeze) and saw the same issues. Disabling
rebuildspam over night, checking this morning shows that I'm at 430MB is
Doug,
if I'm right, you use the ASSP_AFC plugin and 'Detect Spam Attachments' is
configured?
The following should solve the problem for you:
- upgrade assp to 12090
- upgrade the ASSP_AFC to the latest version
- upgrade the ASSP_OCR plugin to the latest version if used
all available on SF-CVS
Thomas Eckardt wrote:
Doug,
if I'm right, you use the ASSP_AFC plugin and 'Detect Spam Attachments' is
configured?
No, the plugin is disabled as are all the plugins.
The following should solve the problem for you:
- upgrade assp to 12090
Did that this morning. Re-enabled rebuildspamdb.
Doug, how many file are processed in the rebuild?
Thomas
Von:Doug Lytle supp...@drdos.info
An: ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
Datum: 30.03.2012 15:05
Betreff:Re: [Assp-test] Antwort: Re: Use both MySQL ( DB:) and
BerkeleyDB ( for other) = flat
Hi!
Shortly:
1)
To Doug ( and to All -- this is look like half-hidden ;-) feature) see later:
mini-HowTo Run RebuildSpamdb now
2)
min--howTo turn off ASSP_AFCDetectSpamAttachRe ( new feature related with
calculation md5 sum. of attachment[s] ( primaryimages, .pdf , .zip ) ):
==
Thomas Eckardt wrote:
Doug, how many file are processed in the rebuild?
Info attached:
File rebuildrun.txt follows:
Mar-30-12 09:00:00 RebuildSpamDB-thread rebuildspamdb-version 3.36 started in
ASSP version 2.1.2(12090)
Mar-30-12 09:00:00 ---ASSP Settings---
Mar-30-12 09:00:00 Use Subject
I'm still trying to get settings right (and I think I'm close), but ASSP is
failing to catch really obviously faked domains!
I put the header below, and you can see that 168-226-66-116.speedy.com.ar is
pretending to be usps.com. I run my mail through netdorm (and have setup
netdorm correctly
Have you tried the mail analyzer provided by ASSP, it might give you a
clue as to why it is accepting it?
On Fri, 30 Mar 2012 09:30:53 -0400, Michelle Dupuis wrote:
I'm still trying to get settings right (and I think I'm close), but
ASSP is failing to catch really obviously faked domains!
I
Set SPFsoftfail to ON
--
This SF email is sponsosred by:
Try Windows Azure free for 90 days Click Here
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sfd2d-msazure
___
Assp-test mailing list
Yes, (see results below) - it says SPF-CHECK returned failed, and I have
spfTestMode turned on.
However, the subject does not have any ASSP added text (even though it should
since it failed) and I have test mode on.
Am I interpreting the fail wrong, or could this be an ASSP bug in not adding
ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net schrei
bt:
(I even have usps.com in the strictSPF file but no difference).
Put it in blockstrictSPFRe
--
This SF email is sponsosred by:
Try Windows Azure
Why is ASSP not throwing out this message based on the obviously faked
sender domain/ip
possibly because you use an outdated version ? I think there was fix for
this in the last months.
Thomas
Von:Michelle Dupuis mdup...@ocg.ca
An: assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
I already had spfsoftfail set to on, but have added the domain to
blockstricgSPFRE now.
I think my confusion is - shouldn't ASSP be catching the obviously forged
source domain not matching usps.com ?
And since I already had spfsoftfail on, shouldn't assp have prepended the fail
warning to
Hi,
Add
^usps\.com$
to invalidhelo.txt
Michael Thomas
Mathbox
978-687-3300
Toll Free: 1-877-MATHBOX (1-877-628-4269)
On 3/30/2012 9:30 AM, Michelle Dupuis wrote:
I'm still trying to get settings right (and I think I'm close), but ASSP is
failing to catch really obviously faked domains!
I
Thomas,
The new Regex::Optimizer changed what slips through, but messags are
slipping through. Several instances of the following slipped through.
Message header Text
==
From: Good Savings admin.d...@pumasdelasalle.com
==
bombHeaderre Regex
==
Thomas,
Regex::Optimizer 1.08/1.07
Seeing other messages that are slipping through like those starting
2012 Equifax and 2012 Experian. They should have been caught.
Switching back to a-d-n-o-r
--
Michael Thomas
Mathbox
978-687-3300
Toll Free: 1-877-MATHBOX (1-877-628-4269)
As long as I know Regex::Optimizer 1.10 is the latest.
Thomas
Von:Michael Thomas m...@mathbox.com
An: ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
Datum: 30.03.2012 21:46
Betreff:[Assp-test] Regex::Optimizer
Thomas,
Regex::Optimizer 1.08/1.07
Seeing other
Hello
a russian admin reported me that the problem with xn--80adjztkde5i.xn which was
fixed some week ago
Mar-28-12 20:43:50 id-33295-00995 [RelayAttempt] 193.200.173.218
w...@shram.kiev.ua relay attempt blocked for:
a.ignat...@xn--80adjztkde5i.xn;
now returned in 1.9.6.4(0.0.03)
Graziano
I'm running ASSP version 2.1.1(11364) so it's a recent version
From: Thomas Eckardt [thomas.ecka...@thockar.com]
Sent: Friday, March 30, 2012 11:31 AM
To: ASSP development mailing list
Subject: [Assp-test] Antwort: Still not catching falsified sender
20 matches
Mail list logo
