Hi all,
fixed in 2.0.2 0.0.03 (also fixed in public version 2.0.1 1.0.03)
- security fix: a workstation behind a NAT network is able to adopt the
user credentials from an other (GUI) logged in workstation in the same
network
ASSP now uses HTTP-Session-ID's to prevent this. Browser cookies
. Re: SpamHaus DBL now online (Thomas Eckardt/eck)
8. v1 new assp.pl version notification request. (Paul K. Dickson)
9. fixes and changes in 2.0.2 0.0.03 (Thomas Eckardt)
--
Message: 1
Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2010 14:48:55 +0100
There is no mention of the default in the GUI.
Move your mouse over the link (name of the config value) right behind
the highlighted short description and a hintbox with the default value
will be shown. If you click on this link, the default value will be
written in the input field.
Also, my
What about changing the weighted regex to the right assp syntax?
~(Email|HTML|Sanesecurity)\.(Phishing|Spear|(Spam|Scam)[a-z0-9]?)\.i~=4.6
Fields marked with two asterisk (**) contains regular expressions (regex)
and accept a second weight value. Every weighted regex that contains at
least one
Hi all,
C H A N G E D in 2.0.2 1.0.01 :
This version and all subsequent versions require a Perl version 5.10.0
(5.01) or higher !
If someone uses Perl 5.8.8 and is unable to upgrade Perl to 5.10 the line
3059 of assp.pl
die \nPerl version 5.01 (5.10.0) is at least needed
: SpamHaus DBL now online (Thomas Eckardt/eck)
8. v1 new assp.pl version notification request. (Paul K. Dickson)
9. fixes and changes in 2.0.2 0.0.03 (Thomas Eckardt)
--
Message: 1
Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2010 14:48:55 +0100
From
:Scott Haneda talkli...@newgeo.com
An: ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
Datum: 12.03.2010 21:14
Betreff:Re: [Assp-test] important change in assp.pl 2.0.2 1.0.01 !
On Mar 12, 2010, at 11:39 AM, Thomas Eckardt wrote:
Trevor,
please run:
perl -e
.
--
--
---
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 20:28:42 +0100
From: Thomas Eckardt thomas.ecka...@thockar.com
Subject: Re: [Assp-test] Assp-test Digest, Vol 32, Issue 8
To: ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
Betreff:Re: [Assp-test] Assp dying
On Mar 13, 2010, at 12:00 AM, Thomas Eckardt wrote:
If you run a DNS-server on the same system calculate 1/2 CPU core for
this
process - 275,000 connections per day , at minimum ~ 5-6 DNS-querys per
connection = 1.500.000 DNS querys per day or ~16
DB_File should be part of default Perl installation (Active Perl for
example)!
Thomas
Von:K Post nntp.p...@gmail.com
An: ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
Datum: 14.03.2010 21:25
Betreff:[Assp-test] DB_File
Where can I find the DB_File perl
run from command line:
perl -e use Compress::Zlib;
the output should tell you any other issue.
Thomas
Von:K Post nntp.p...@gmail.com
An: ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
Datum: 14.03.2010 21:35
Betreff:[Assp-test] Compress::Zlib
I updated
Changing the version numbering in V1 is possible - but not easy to do
because of the running autoupdate feature.
In V2 this is more complicated, because the plugins are checking the ASSP
version number to detect if they are compatible to the running version.
I think it is realy easy. Than higher
DB_File module is available at trouchelle respository.
or if I got
DB_File working be sufficient
DB_File ? - this module uses BerkeleyDB V1 and V2 and is not thread save -
we need a Berkeley engine V4.5 at least . Use BerkeleyDB.pm (assp.mod _
V4.7.25 BerkeleyDB engine and BerkeleyDB.pm
at
assp-test-ow...@lists.sourceforge.net
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than
Re: Contents of Assp-test digest...
Today's Topics:
1. Re: DB_File (Thomas Eckardt)
2. Re: Compress::Zlib (Thomas Eckardt)
3. Re: ASSP headers mangled (Thomas Eckardt
Read the GUI !
use 'NoTLSlistenPorts'
Thomas
Von:K Post nntp.p...@gmail.com
An: ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
Datum: 15.03.2010 19:05
Betreff:[Assp-test] Enable TLS only on listenPortSSL and not
listenPort
Is there a way to enable TLS
`
--
Or is the Problem here (Exception.log) ?
Mär-14-10 12:09:46 Error: Worker_5: error: got unexpected signal TERM in
Worker_5: package - Thread::Queue, file -
/usr/local/lib/perl5/5.10.1/Thread/Queue.pm, line - 51!
Best Regargs
Ralf
Thomas Eckardt thomas.ecka...@thockar.com 16.03.10 8.15 Uhr
check your
dying (Thomas Eckardt)
--
Message: 1
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 21:16:03 +0300
From: ?? ?? (Steve Mallindine) st...@sc.ru.ru
Subject: Re: [Assp-test] Assp dying
To: ASSP development mailing list assp-test
, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than
Re: Contents of Assp-test digest...
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Assp dying (?? ?? (Steve Mallindine))
2. Re: Assp dying (Thomas Eckardt)
--
Message: 1
Date
if
possible, berkeley, a mix?
Your experience is appreciated.
Ken
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 2:35 AM, Thomas Eckardt
thomas.ecka...@thockar.com wrote:
The module name is DB_File (case sensitive !!).
Thomas
Von:K Post nntp.p...@gmail.com
An: ASSP development mailing list assp-test
line so it is more specific than
Re: Contents of Assp-test digest...
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Assp dying (Thomas Eckardt)
2. Re: DB_File (Thomas Eckardt)
3. Re: Assp dying (GrayHat)
4. Re: DB_File (GrayHat)
5. Re: DB_File (Scott MacLean)
6. Re: Assp dying (Scott MacLean
Dont waste your time.
I'm just testing a new version of this code lines (maybe some milliseconds
slower but with much less usage of system resources).
Thomas
Von:Scott Haneda talkli...@newgeo.com
An: ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
Kopie: ASSP
Hi all,
fixed in 2.0.2_1.0.03
- it was possible that some of our 'X-Assp-...' headers where unneeded
MIME-encoded - this is fixed
- The AutoWhite feature has not written (updated) the current time to
the whitelistdb, if the recipient was already whitelisted
- the 'webAdminPassword' was used
14689d 16h 26m 32s
There is value of '0' returned - there must be a bug in the new fetch sub.
Thomas
Von:Pascal Dreissen pas...@dreissen.nl
An: development mailing list ASSP assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
Datum: 21.03.2010 17:50
Betreff:[Assp-test] Delay broken ?
I am
Pascal - please try 2.0.2 1.0.05 from CVS !
Thomas
Von:Pascal Dreissen pas...@dreissen.nl
An: development mailing list ASSP assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
Datum: 21.03.2010 17:50
Betreff:[Assp-test] Delay broken ?
I am seeing these entries a lot since 1.0.0.3 (2.0.2)
] Delay broken ?
I can confirm, is working again .. thanks!
Op 21 mrt 2010, om 20:05 heeft Thomas Eckardt het volgende geschreven:
Pascal - please try 2.0.2 1.0.05 from CVS !
Thomas
Von:Pascal Dreissen pas...@dreissen.nl
An: development mailing list ASSP assp-test
Hi all,
fixed in 2.0.1 1.0.06
- fixed an error in rebuildspamdb.pm 'global symbol $VerBerkeley
requires explicit package name'
added in 2.0.1 1.0.06
'TLStoProxyListenPorts','Force TLS to Proxy on this Ports',
'If a STARTTLS command is received on a port that is defined here,
the
Pascal,
(list.dnswl.org-127.0.5.0,trust=0; )
The trust is '0' - none - only avoid outright blocking (eg Hotmail, Yahoo
mailservers...) ???
Categories (127.0.X.y):
•2 - Financial services
•3 - Email Service Providers
•4 - Organisations (both for-profit [ie companies] and non-profit)
•5 -
the person managing the list at
assp-test-ow...@lists.sourceforge.net
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than
Re: Contents of Assp-test digest...
Today's Topics:
1. Delay broken ? (Pascal Dreissen)
2. Re: Delay broken ? (Thomas Eckardt)
3
it is more specific than
Re: Contents of Assp-test digest...
Today's Topics:
1. RWL and Damping (Pascal Dreissen)
2. Re: RWL and Damping (Thomas Eckardt)
3. Re: Assp dying (Thomas Eckardt)
--
Message: 1
Date: Mon, 22
Mar-23-10 15:18:54 id-17932-02598 [Worker_3] [VIRUS][scoring] 192.168.1.2
snc-a6759f9a-b373-4f8c-b819-f5c1c4118...@cvent-planner.com to:
jlbr...@bordo.com.au 'INetMsg.SpamDomain-2w.cvent_com.UNOFFICIAL' passing
because of 'INetMsg.SpamDomain-2w.'
meens that the mail is passing the virus check
-ow...@lists.sourceforge.net
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than
Re: Contents of Assp-test digest...
Today's Topics:
1. Delay broken ? (Pascal Dreissen)
2. Re: Delay broken ? (Thomas Eckardt)
3. Re: Delay broken ? (Thomas Eckardt)
4. Re: Delay
Hi all,
fixed in 2.0.2 1.0.07
- if BerkeleyDB is used for LDAPlist or the AdminUsersDB the store to disk
(db_sync) thows an error
- it was possible that the worker calculation causes a division by zero
exception (very rare)
changed:
- the BerkeleyDB cache has now a maximum limit of 100MB
Still seeing out of memory errors in 2.0.2 1.0.07:
Out of memory!
Callback called exit at assp.pl line 17744.
Out of memory!
Callback called exit at assp.pl line 17769.
At 03:35 PM 3/23/2010, Thomas Eckardt wrote:
while (time - $itime = $maxBombSearchTime $text =~ s/($regex)//) {
this should
will try it.
Thomas
Von:Pascal Dreissen pas...@dreissen.nl
An: ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
Datum: 25.03.2010 09:27
Betreff:[Assp-test] message size
Hi Thomas,
Is it possible to get the accepted message size logged (maillog) in assp ?
SMTP-session-limit 999 is reached
- SMTP listeners will be switched off
set the session limit to a value as high as you need it - if set to zero -
999 will be used. Keep in mind, that if the limit is reached, the
listeners (default, listener2, ssl-listener) will be closed until the
session
Hi all,
changed in 2.0.2 1.0.08
- assp now tries to optimize all regular expressions to force Perl to use
less memory - if the optimization failes the original regexes will be used
I recommend to do the optimization manualy by changing the regex terms in
the following manner:
(abcde) -
Line 42110 is actually the last line in the file assp.pl
The last line of that version is 42517 - please download from SF-CVS.
Can't locate Image/OCR/Tesseract.pm
Your modul installation is incomplete. Try to fix that or remove
ASSP_OCR.pm from the'Plugins' folder.
Thomas
Von:James
It is possible that SF was temporary unavailable - assp will retry the
download some hours later.
Thomas
Von:Manfred Aretz manfred.ar...@traphoma.de
An: assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
Datum: 06.04.2010 00:53
Betreff:Re: [Assp-test] Assp-test Digest, Vol 33, Issue 2
On 06/04/2010, at 3:04 PM, Thomas Eckardt wrote:
Line 42110 is actually the last line in the file assp.pl
The last line of that version is 42517 - please download from SF-CVS.
Thanks Thomas. I tried:
cvs -d:pserver:anonym...@assp.cvs.sourceforge.net:/cvsroot/assp login
which asks me
, Issue 2 (Thomas Eckardt)
2. Re: ASSP 2.0.2 1.0.08 fails to start (James Brown)
3. Re: ASSP 2.0.2 1.0.08 fails to start (Thomas Eckardt)
4. ASSP 1.7.4(0.0.03) Email Interface Issues (Hill, Brett)
--
Message: 1
Date: Tue, 6
any of this should do it:
UPS_invoice_\d{1,4}\.zip # 1 - 4 digits
UPS_invoice_\d*\.zip # 0 - infinity digits
UPS_invoice_\d+\.zip # 1 - infinity digits
UPS_invoice_.*?\.zip # 0 - infinity characters
UPS_invoice_.+?\.zip # 1 - infinity characters
it is more specific than
Re: Contents of Assp-test digest...
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Assp 2.0.1(1.0.06) download failed (GrayHat)
2. Bombre (Hill, Brett)
3. Re: Bombre (Hill, Brett)
4. Re: Bombre (Fritz Borgstedt)
5. Re: Bombre (Hill, Brett)
6. Re: Bombre (Thomas Eckardt)
7. Re
Hi all,
fixed in 2.0.2_1.0.09
- If an regular expression has failed to compile (in 1.0.08), the contents
of the regex was written in to the file assp.cfg.
changed:
- if VRFY or RCPT TO is used to verify the recipient address and the MTA
is not available the address was rejected - it is now
could it possible have an option to apply all ASSP spam checks if a
sender passes
successfully delaying/greylisting ?
I think this does not make sense. Running checks, that are not configured
will result in a unwanted behavior of assp. But if all features are well
configured, all checks will
:
1. Re: SBCache (Thomas Eckardt)
2. delaying filter (suggestion) (Graziano)
3. fixes and changes in assp 2.0.2_1.0.09 (Thomas Eckardt)
4. Re: delaying filter (suggestion) (Thomas Eckardt)
--
Message: 1
Date: Sat, 10 Apr
Hi all,
fixed in 2.0.2_1.0.10:
- if noSPFRe is used an error 'Unmatched ( in regex; marked by -- HERE
in m/( -- HERE (?-xism:(?is:.))/ at assp.pl line 14653.
'
cause the thread (Worker) to die.
changed:
- if VRFY or RCPT TO check is used and the MTA is not available - assp now
uses
\b\w\w\w-\d\d-\d\d\s\d\d:\d\d:\d\d\swarning:
work? Is there a better way?
Any way you want - it is a regex build on the entries.
Oh, and nitpicky:
will be changed in 2.0.2_1.0.11
Info: new assp version=overridere...@ourdomain.org=ASSP update
available
warning:==ASSP Warning Message Logged
in 2.0.2_1.0.10
On 2010-04-15 4:19 AM, Thomas Eckardt wrote:
- if VRFY or RCPT TO check is used and the MTA is not available - assp
now
uses 'LDAPFail' to decide if the adrress is valid or not.
'LDAPFail','LDAP/VRFY failures return
false',20,\checkbox,'','(.*)',undef,'If checked, when an error
Pascal,
I'm looking for the reason, but currently I'm unable to reproduce this.
Stay on 1.08 as long as I have not found and fixed it.
By the way - do you use the regex optimizer ? If yes - try to disable the
module 'Regex::Optimizer' in 'Module Setup' . If this is done, assp should
work the
How ever - I never send a 5xx on a unknown recipient.
Thomas
Von:Charles Marcus cmar...@media-brokers.com
An: assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
Datum: 15.04.2010 21:49
Betreff:Re: [Assp-test] fixes and changes in 2.0.2_1.0.10
On 2010-04-15 2:23 PM, Thomas Eckardt wrote
:12
Betreff:Re: [Assp-test] fixes and changes in 2.0.2_1.0.10
On 2010-04-15 4:36 PM, Thomas Eckardt wrote:
'NoValidRecipient' is used in every case.
?? Why? You should *never* reject with a 5XX Invalid Recipient in a TEMP
fail situation.
This is a really bad decision.
How ever - I
ASSP uses Regex::Optimizer not Regexp::Optimizer
I've taken the code from Regexp::Optimizer to build Regex::Optimizer (for
assp), because the original code does not work for us.
Regex::Optimizer and Regex::List is available at SF-CVS (read the change
log).
Hi all,
fixed in 2.0.2_1.0.11
- localaddresses_flat was not working in 1.0.09 and 1.0.10
- some regexes where processed without getting a result
changed:
- NotifyRe - is enhanced -
As third parameter after a second (\'=\') you can define the subject
line for the notification message.
Yes and some other strange behavior.
Thomas
Von:Scott MacLean a...@hollsco.com
An: ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
Datum: 18.04.2010 17:01
Betreff:Re: [Assp-test] fixes and changed in 2.0.2_1.0.11
At 09:17 AM 4/18/2010, Thomas Eckardt wrote
I had the idea before - but loading them from the exported version (cache)
will disable weighting - also what is happen, if a file was changed while
assp was down?
It is not too much time needed for the optimization - max 20s I think.
Thomas
Von:Grayhat gray...@gmx.net
An: ASSP
Hi all,
there is a bug in version 1.01 of the Regex::XXX modules - if you use this
feature please download (SF-CVS) and use version 1.02 .
Thomas
DISCLAIMER:
***
This email and any files transmitted with it may be confidential, legally
The same way like the CVS folder structure.
./lib/Regex/List.pm
./lib/Regex/Optimizer.pm
Thomas
Von:GrayHat gray...@gmx.net
An: ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
Datum: 19.04.2010 09:43
Betreff:Re: [Assp-test] ASSP V2 regex optimizer version 1.02
the person managing the list at
assp-test-ow...@lists.sourceforge.net
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than
Re: Contents of Assp-test digest...
Today's Topics:
1. Re: SBCache (Thomas Eckardt)
2. delaying filter (suggestion) (Graziano
Hi all,
I've improved the regex optimizer.
Some regexes are too complex to be optimized - and they will possibly
destroyed by the optimizer modules. In addition to the options to exclude
complete files from beeing optimized, it is now possible to exclude single
lines from optimization.
for
Worker_5: error: got unexpected signal TERM in
How ever, this signal is produced inside the threads module. ASSP captures
all not explicid defined signals (in ASSP) and runs in to a
sub/signal-handler which produces the logged line. After that, the thread
should go back in to normal state if
Hi all,
fixed in 2.0.2_1.0.12
- some regexes have captured wrong results (new Regex::Optimizer / List
modules 1.04 on SF-CVS)
- the startup time for the workers is decreased (1.011) if the regex
optimizer is used - the workers using the regex from the files exported by
the MainThread
-
Only a wrong output in the GUI - sorry. Will be fixed in 1.13.
The optimization for all regexes takes about 25 seconds on my prod system.
Thomas
Von:K Post nntp.p...@gmail.com
An: ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
Datum: 25.04.2010 03:43
Betreff:
Hi all,
fixed in 2.0.2_1.0.13
- wrong output for the optimizer module in the 'Infos and Stats' GUI
- the output of the CIDR result for matching IP's now works
- the performance of 'matchIP' and 'matchSL' is improved
Thomas
DISCLAIMER:
***
Is there documentation anywhere on this?
Yes - ASSP_SkeletonTest.pm
Thomas
Von:K Post nntp.p...@gmail.com
An: ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
Datum: 26.04.2010 00:07
Betreff:Re: [Assp-test] Customizations and updates - plugin
possibility?
On
it out. Thank you both.
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 12:14 AM, Thomas Eckardt
thomas.ecka...@thockar.com wrote:
Is there documentation anywhere on this?
Yes - ASSP_SkeletonTest.pm
Thomas
Von:K Post nntp.p...@gmail.com
An: ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
Does this mean that that IP is erroneously whitelisted in the AHBL
RWL?
I saw this on my system this morning (while testing a new release) - but
the mail reached the PB and was blocked. Is there a problem with '
exemptions.ahbl.org' ?
Thomas
Von:K Post nntp.p...@gmail.com
An: ASSP
Hi all,
fixed in 2.0.2_1.1.01:
- If someone uses 'web.de' as ISP - assp was unable to detect the
orginating IP and helo - because the received header of web.de is somehow
different..
changed :
'bombCharSets','Regular Expression to Identify Foreign Charsets**'
Part of DoBombHeaderRe: header
Set
ValidateUserLog to diagnostic
allLogReRE - to a domain or user
you should see more information in the log.
Thomas
Von:Michael a...@agrodur.com
An: assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
Datum: 30.04.2010 12:47
Betreff:[Assp-test] LocalAdresses_Flat not working with 2.0.1
Happened to me twice so far, I copied all the addresses, then cleared the
file, saved it, restarted asp pasted the addresses back in
And what is the difference between the two files (old - new)?
Thomas
Von:Steve Moffat st...@optimum.bm
An: ASSP development mailing list
Sounds like the file (or at least its image in memory) got corrupted
The directory ./files/optRE contains the more or less optimized
regular expressions (memory) .
Thomas
Von:GrayHat gray...@gmx.net
An: ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
Datum:
Just send me the optimized version of your flat file
(files/optRE/LocalAddresses_Flat.txt).
Thomas
Von:Michael a...@agrodur.com
An: ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
Datum: 30.04.2010 15:02
Betreff:Re: [Assp-test] LocalAdresses_Flat not working
I've uploaded a 2.0.2_1.1.02_p-white.pl to the 'test' folder on SF-CVS.
There is a major change in the code that uses a personal Whitelist, which
works as follows:
- if a Whitelist addition is done - also a personal entry is written in to
the Whitelist
This is a mail I've got:
**
It’s one fault, IMO, is that it assumes everyone agrees what is spam and
what is not. That is where I find most people end up with false positives
or negatives. For instance, todayI had a user submit over 60 items tagged
as spam to our whitelist.
The reason for the whitelist was, that everyone who receives a block
report, is able to whitelist addresses - and maybe there is someone who
don't want these addresses whitelisted. Public blacklisting is not so
common (I think).
Thomas
Von:GrayHat gray...@gmx.net
An: ASSP
as whitelisted, everyone else consideres the address as
spammer. The address sends an email to multiple addresses including
the person how whitelisted it. Is the mail passed?
Steve
Sent from my iPhone
On 03.05.2010, at 15:34, Thomas Eckardt thomas.ecka...@thockar.com
wrote:
I've uploaded
On 2010-05-03 10:43 AM, Thomas Eckardt wrote:
The reason for the whitelist was, that everyone who receives a block
report, is able to whitelist addresses - and maybe there is someone who
don't want these addresses whitelisted. Public blacklisting is not so
common (I think).
+1
someone doesn't want to receive some messages (s)he may just add
a given sender to his/her personal BL (which will probably be smaller)
But this (personal blacklist) is provided by every mail client - or not?
Thomas
Von:GrayHat gray...@gmx.net
An: ASSP development mailing list
The Whitelist has nothing directly to do with the corpus (Bayes). The
Whitelist is only manipulated by sending mails to the addresses defined in
EmailWhitelistAdd
EmailWhitelistRemove
let's say 100 users decided
that a given email is JUNK and ONE decided it's fine
let's say better - one
about 780mb of ram. After running for a
couple of days, it gets up to 1.4gb. Is that normal?
On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 11:56 AM, Thomas Eckardt
thomas.ecka...@thockar.com wrote:
May-01-10 05:43:15 Resulting file 'c:/assp/spamdb.rb.tmp' is 3,908,453
bytes
May-01-10 05:47:53 Bayesian Pairs: 165,592
Hi all,
assp_pop3.pl version 1.03 is available at SF-CVS:
changed:
- a new parameter 'SMTPsender' is available to define the used SMTP FROM:
address. If this parameter is not defined, the original (collected) FROM:
address is used - if this is not found, the POP account will be used.
Thomas
Hi all,
fixed in 2.0.2_1.1.03:
- in some cases the 'open file' link was in the block report - even if the
recipient was not an email admin
- in some cases the 'bombSubjectRe' was not working
changed:
- POP3: - a new parameter 'SMTPsender' is available to define the used
SMTP FROM: address.
of the spam db. I am not in front of
the machine now, but I seem to remember that the spam db ADDs to
itself each rebuild. Is there a way to have it build to a point and
then remove old data?
thanks
On 5/7/10, Thomas Eckardt thomas.ecka...@thockar.com wrote:
When assp starts it's using about 780mb
I wonder what's causing those
No, it is caused by the wrong format of a 'Content-Type' in a MIME
message. 'Windows-1252' is a charset not a Content-Type.
avoid such messages
No way! 1.1.04 will not print the messages if 'IgnoreMIMEErrors' is set
to on.
Thomas
Von:GrayHat
SMTP Connection damping: 293 (35.61% avg of accepted connections)
1.1.04 will have it
Thomas
Von:Trevor Jacques tre...@videlicet.com
An: ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
Datum: 08.05.2010 15:43
Betreff:[Assp-test] Admin GUI suggestion
Callback called exit at assp.pl line 19165.
need the subversion to get the code of the line
Is it every time the same line where the callback is found?
Thomas
Von:GrayHat gray...@gmx.net
An: assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
Datum: 10.05.2010 10:10
Betreff:[Assp-test] Assp
Uhm ok, I see, but I also saw those messages logged while
running a rebuildspamdb and with SMTP disabled ...
The rebuildspamdb parses the message the same way like the
real-assp-scanner (mostly using the same sub's)
there's no problem in seeing those in the logs
The result for a wrong MIME
Hi all,
fixed in 2.0.2_1.1.04
- the VRFY and EXPN offer, was not removed from the HELP reply (211,214)
if 'DisableVRFY' was enabled
- the CHUNKING,PIPELINING and XEXCH50 offer, was not removed from the HELP
reply (211,214)
changed:
- the open for all listeners is moved to a later state
so we can copy the maillog entry
as is (1.2.3.4 u...@sending.domain.com)
2.0.2_1.1.05 will accept the notation of the tuplet without the comma
Thomas
Von:K Post nntp.p...@gmail.com
An: ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
Datum: 13.05.2010 02:27
Betreff:
if you want or need it before 1.1.05 is released, change line 28868 of
version 1.1.04 to
while
($qs{addresses}=~/(\d+\.\d+\.\d+\.\d+)\s*,?\s*?(?:$EmailAdrRe\@)?($EmailDomainRe|)?/go)
{
Thomas
Von:K Post nntp.p...@gmail.com
An: ASSP development mailing list
so that the most aggressive URI
2.0.2_1.1.05 will have such a option
if the weight is specified, the weight value will be used for the hit
count, otherwise 1 will be used
dbl.spamhaus.org=1.1
multi.surbl.org=1.2
black.uribl.com=2.5
aggressive.someuribl.net=4
if (for example) every URISP
Could it be that in this version the sockets are created AFTER assp
downgrades its privileges to assp.nobody in my case and thus fails to do
so?
YES - sorry I oversaw this and will change it back in 1.1.05
Thomas
Von:m...@mailspot.at m...@mailspot.at
An: ASSP development mailing
Uhm... so it won't work like the DNSBL where specifying
I'll try this in 1.1.06 .
Thomas
Von:GrayHat gray...@gmx.net
An: ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
Datum: 13.05.2010 13:24
Betreff:Re: [Assp-test] URIBL checks
2.0.2_1.1.05 will have
Hi all,
fixed in 2.0.2_1.1.05:
- if the 'change user' feature is used in 1.1.04 on nix boxes the
listeners could be possibly not created
- if blockreports where scheduled at midnight - it was possible that this
task was going in to collision to the logrotate task and so some lines
where
There is no need for such a button (IMHO). If the last version check was
successful, the next is scheduled within the next 12-16 hours, if it was
not successful the schedule for the next check is ~4 hours.
But how ever, if you want to force a check, simply delete the file
'version.txt' and
Apr-23-10 09:21:42 warning: got unexpected signal TERM in Worker_5:
package - Thread::Queue, file -
This should be fixed in the next release - it looks like that 'perl
5.10.1 under freebsd version 8' pipes a signal that is sent to the
MainThread to every running thread, which is not
Version 2
Thank you. I hope, that then the autostart after new updates works well.
In the moment I must start assp manualy after each update.
Ralf
Thomas Eckardt thomas.ecka...@thockar.com 16.05.10 10.43 Uhr
Apr-23-10 09:21:42 warning: got unexpected signal TERM in Worker_5:
package - Thread
:[Assp-test] Antw: Re: My error with Thread::Queue in assp
Version 2
Thank you. I hope, that then the autostart after new updates works well.
In the moment I must start assp manualy after each update.
Ralf
Thomas Eckardt thomas.ecka...@thockar.com 16.05.10 10.43 Uhr
Apr-23-10 09
Hi all,
fixed in 2.0.2_1.1.06
- a domain defined in 'URIBLWL' and 'URIBLNP' was skipped if it was found
in the body of the mail - but it was not skipped if it was the senders
domain
- some times an unexpected SIG TERM where found in workers if ASSP got a
SIG TERM
added:
find the error.
I think you make the restart by a sigterm, but which of them ?
Here is part of the sigterms from Version 1.1.06:
queue released
TTOU(22)
SYS(12)
-
- - installed
MainThread started
best regards
Ralf
Thomas Eckardt thomas.ecka...@thockar.com 16.05.10 12.42 Uhr
I hope
Thomas; does the URIBL weitghting work like the DNSBL now ?
Sorry - no. It is not so easy to do - but you'll find it in the release
notes, if it is finished.
The (also now) problem is, that we stop searching on the first match
(hit), but this could be an URI with a very soft weight - any one
1 - 100 of 3742 matches
Mail list logo
