Re: [Assp-user] ASSP Development was -> ASSP effectiveness

2016-03-04 Thread William L. Thomson Jr.
On Friday, March 04, 2016 08:17:54 AM Thomas Eckardt wrote: > >You cannot go > >download each previous version that was released. > > This is simply NOT true. > > https://sourceforge.net/projects/assp/files/OldFiles/ > > But you need a SF account and you have to login to see the old versions.

Re: [Assp-user] ASSP Development was -> ASSP effectiveness

2016-03-03 Thread Grayhat
:: On Fri, 4 Mar 2016 08:17:54 +0100 :: :: Thomas Eckardt wrote: > >You cannot go > >download each previous version that was released. > > This is simply NOT true. > >

Re: [Assp-user] ASSP Development was -> ASSP effectiveness

2016-03-03 Thread Thomas Eckardt
t; <w...@o-sinc.com> An: assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net Datum: 03.03.2016 21:44 Betreff:Re: [Assp-user] ASSP Development was -> ASSP effectiveness On Thursday, March 03, 2016 11:44:43 AM Lee Howard wrote: > How many is "many"? Did you take a survey? Or are you mere

Re: [Assp-user] ASSP Development was -> ASSP effectiveness

2016-03-03 Thread Lee Howard
On 03/03/2016 12:41 PM, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: > On Thursday, March 03, 2016 11:44:43 AM Lee Howard wrote: > >> How many is "many"? > It was discussed in the past on list by several, and some other put it on > Wikipdia. How much do you need? I'm merely pointing out that you're using the

Re: [Assp-user] ASSP Development was -> ASSP effectiveness

2016-03-03 Thread William L. Thomson Jr.
On Thursday, March 03, 2016 03:50:33 PM Robert K Coffman Jr. -Info From Data Corp. wrote: > >On 3/3/2016 3:41 PM, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: > > No it never led to a fork, but I think it might be why Fritz ceased > > working on ASSP. > > No, Fritz passed away and was actively developing the

Re: [Assp-user] ASSP Development was -> ASSP effectiveness

2016-03-03 Thread Robert K Coffman Jr. -Info From Data Corp.
>On 3/3/2016 3:41 PM, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: > No it never led to a fork, but I think it might be why Fritz ceased working on > ASSP. No, Fritz passed away and was actively developing the week before that happened. - Bob

Re: [Assp-user] ASSP Development was -> ASSP effectiveness

2016-03-03 Thread William L. Thomson Jr.
On Thursday, March 03, 2016 11:44:43 AM Lee Howard wrote: > How many is "many"? Did you take a survey? Or are you merely > expressing what you feel should be accurate because you believe your > opinions are shared by Alchaemist from Wikipedia (who put the > "Disadvantages" bits into the article

Re: [Assp-user] ASSP Development was -> ASSP effectiveness

2016-03-03 Thread Lee Howard
On 03/03/2016 09:37 AM, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: > > Its not just mine, its a sentiment that has existed for years, shared by many. I think debate and discussion are healthy but it needs to be done without these types of hyperbole. How many is "many"? Did you take a survey? Or are you

Re: [Assp-user] ASSP Development was -> ASSP effectiveness

2016-03-03 Thread Robert K Coffman Jr. -Info From Data Corp.
Best to let this discussion die until someone says they want to do the work. Who cares if it is a good idea or not? Please don't answer this question, it is rhetorical. And list activity is a poor measure of the activity of the project. My ASSP v2 installs are stable, working well, and not