Re: [asterisk-biz] Asterisk cluster / failover program - Lite version announcement

2010-11-26 Thread Gerald Bove
No, not at all. Unless of course, you automatically appeared in another car the moment the first one broke down, without effecting your drive whatsoever. -Original Message- From: asterisk-biz-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-biz-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of

Re: [asterisk-biz] Asterisk cluster / failover program - Lite version announcement

2010-11-26 Thread Steve Poirier
I do not agree. Unless you're missing the skills to do it. __ Steve Poirier Director of Operations Swiftvox - Voip.ms On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 9:58 AM, li...@contacttel.com wrote: Sorry you can't put Asterisk and failover in same sentence. Any one who Thinks and sells that, is just plain

Re: [asterisk-biz] Asterisk cluster / failover program - Lite version announcement

2010-11-26 Thread Steve Poirier
I disagree totally, unless you're lacking hardware resources and/or technical skills. If you have more than 1 asterisk box and proper hardware, it's quite simple to achieve failover. I'm not endorsing the original OP's product at all, just saying that your statement is wrong. __ Steve Poirier

Re: [asterisk-biz] Asterisk cluster / failover program - Lite version announcement

2010-11-26 Thread Michelle Dupuis
Many HAAST license sales have been to call centers with very competent Asterisk Linux admins, with complex needs (eg: failover between geographically distant call centers, hook into diagnostic/line information of proprietary hardware). We also have reseller agreements with Asterisk