---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3357/
---
(Updated April 11, 2014, 5:12 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3357/#review11548
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- opticron
On March 27, 2014, 3:43 p.m.,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3357/#review11555
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Mark Michelson
On March 27, 2014, 8:43
On March 24, 2014, 3:33 p.m., Mark Michelson wrote:
Four of the five tests presented here (no_event_header, below_min_expiry,
unallowed, and unknown_event_package) should use the SIPp test case instead
of copying and pasting the same run-test script for each one. This requires
adding
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3357/#review11391
---
The tests look good, but Matt said to go ahead and add an MWI
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3357/
---
(Updated March 27, 2014, 3:43 p.m.)
Review request for Asterisk
On March 24, 2014, 3:33 p.m., Mark Michelson wrote:
/asterisk/trunk/tests/channels/pjsip/subscriptions/presence/no_accept_header/sipp/subscribe.xml,
line 27
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3357/diff/1/?file=56030#file56030line27
You have some problematic XML in this line here.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3357/
---
(Updated March 26, 2014, 3:04 p.m.)
Review request for Asterisk
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3357/#review11358
---
Four of the five tests presented here (no_event_header,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3357/
---
(Updated March 14, 2014, 2:13 p.m.)
Review request for Asterisk
10 matches
Mail list logo
