Re: [asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 3380: ARI: When a channel controlled by stasis is removed from a bridge, automatically created subscriptions to the bridge aren't removed.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3380/ --- (Updated March 25, 2014, 10:44 a.m.) Status -- This change has been

Re: [asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 3380: ARI: When a channel controlled by stasis is removed from a bridge, automatically created subscriptions to the bridge aren't removed.

On March 21, 2014, 2:05 p.m., Jonathan Rose wrote: /branches/12/res/res_stasis.c, line 739 https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3380/diff/1/?file=56309#file56309line739 It might also be appropriate to move this declaration into the loop... but ultimately kind of pointless since it

[asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 3380: ARI: When a channel controlled by stasis is removed from a bridge, automatically created subscriptions to the bridge aren't removed.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3380/ --- Review request for Asterisk Developers, Matt Jordan and opticron.

Re: [asterisk-dev] [Code Review] 3380: ARI: When a channel controlled by stasis is removed from a bridge, automatically created subscriptions to the bridge aren't removed.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3380/#review11316 --- /branches/12/res/res_stasis.c