.)
Review request for Asterisk Developers.
Bugs: ASTERISK-17179
https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-17179
Repository: Asterisk
Description
---
This patch is filed on behalf of Geert Van Pamel as filed against Asterisk-12
on ASTERISK-17179
Attachments
RFC-3966 tel URI patch
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/media/uploaded/files/2014/03/13/cad7a996-88c1-47fe-a2a9-cc6987af3b75__rfc-3966-tel-uri-patch-diff.txt
Thanks,
Geert Van Pamel
--
_
-- Bandwidth
output.
File Attachments
RFC-3966 tel URI patch
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/media/uploaded/files/2014/03/13/cad7a996-88c1-47fe-a2a9-cc6987af3b75__rfc-3966-tel-uri-patch-diff.txt
Thanks,
Geert Van Pamel
RFC-3966 tel URI patch
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/media/uploaded/files/2014/03/13/cad7a996-88c1-47fe-a2a9-cc6987af3b75__rfc-3966-tel-uri-patch-diff.txt
Thanks,
Geert Van Pamel
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation
RFC-3966 tel URI patch
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/media/uploaded/files/2014/03/13/cad7a996-88c1-47fe-a2a9-cc6987af3b75__rfc-3966-tel-uri-patch-diff.txt
Thanks,
Geert Van Pamel
--
_
-- Bandwidth
-a2a9-cc6987af3b75__rfc-3966-tel-uri-patch-diff.txt
Thanks,
Geert Van Pamel
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-dev mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http
, 8:01 p.m., Geert Van Pamel wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3349/
---
(Updated March 17, 2014, 8:01 p.m
. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3349/#review11237
---
On March 17, 2014, 8:01 p.m., Geert Van Pamel wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply
/cad7a996-88c1-47fe-a2a9-cc6987af3b75__rfc-3966-tel-uri-patch-diff.txt
Thanks,
Geert Van Pamel
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-dev mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit
://reviewboard.asterisk.org/media/uploaded/files/2014/03/13/cad7a996-88c1-47fe-a2a9-cc6987af3b75__rfc-3966-tel-uri-patch-diff.txt
Thanks,
Geert Van Pamel
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com
generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3349/#review11291
---
On March 20, 2014, 10:59 p.m., Geert Van Pamel wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e
://reviewboard.asterisk.org/media/uploaded/files/2014/03/13/cad7a996-88c1-47fe-a2a9-cc6987af3b75__rfc-3966-tel-uri-patch-diff.txt
Thanks,
Geert Van Pamel
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com
---
On March 21, 2014, 8:32 a.m., Geert Van Pamel wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3349
-3966 tel URI patch
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/media/uploaded/files/2014/03/13/cad7a996-88c1-47fe-a2a9-cc6987af3b75__rfc-3966-tel-uri-patch-diff.txt
Thanks,
Geert Van Pamel
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3349/#review11323
---
On March 22, 2014, 2:08 p.m., Geert Van Pamel wrote:
---
This is an automatically
On March 22, 2014, 4:39 p.m., Olle E Johansson wrote:
I don't see what happens with the phone-context argument. Shouldn't we pass
that on as a channel variable?
Geert Van Pamel wrote:
We return this into the hostport.
According to RFC 3966 phone-context is either a domain-name
---
On March 22, 2014, 2:08 p.m., Geert Van Pamel wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3349
On March 22, 2014, 4:39 p.m., Olle E Johansson wrote:
I don't see what happens with the phone-context argument. Shouldn't we pass
that on as a channel variable?
Geert Van Pamel wrote:
We return this into the hostport.
Geert Van Pamel wrote:
According to RFC 3966 phone
On March 22, 2014, 4:39 p.m., Olle E Johansson wrote:
I don't see what happens with the phone-context argument. Shouldn't we pass
that on as a channel variable?
Geert Van Pamel wrote:
We return this into the hostport.
Geert Van Pamel wrote:
According to RFC 3966 phone
on SIP debug output.
File Attachments
RFC-3966 tel URI patch
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/media/uploaded/files/2014/03/13/cad7a996-88c1-47fe-a2a9-cc6987af3b75__rfc-3966-tel-uri-patch-diff.txt
Thanks,
Geert Van Pamel
20 matches
Mail list logo