Thank you for the reply.
On 10 Dec 2010 at 8:53, Jeroen (Jeroen Eeuwes jeroeneeu...@gmail.com)
commented about Re: [asterisk-users] Configuring Softphone:
Hi Gary,
I not using anything to create my dialplan. I'm trying to add a softphone
to a dialplan
that was created a couple years
Hi Gary,
That is a great suggestion. Yes I did try that. I might be having router
issues with a
SonicWall. I'm working with a port sniffer now to try to figure it out.
When I'm
done with making sure the router is forwarding everything correctly I'll try
that
again.
If a router is
On 10 Dec 2010 at 9:31, Jeroen (Jeroen Eeuwes jeroeneeu...@gmail.com)
commented about Re: [asterisk-users] Configuring Softphone:
Hi Gary,
That is a great suggestion. Yes I did try that. I might be having router
issues with a
SonicWall. I'm working with a port sniffer now to try
On Wed, 08 Dec 2010 10:48:06 -0800, Dave Platt dpl...@radagast.org
wrote:
It does sound as if the mic-input gain is too low for those
headsets.
Disabling the on-board soundcard and using even an entr-level PCI
soundcard solved the issue. If some customers complain about low sound
when using the
Hello everybody,
I am trying to set up followme. As far as I understood from
followme.conf multiple digits are allowed to be used for taking call.
Currently call is accepted only if one digit is configured for takecall, e,g
takecall=5
Don't you know are there any real limitations for using
Hi,
On one of our asterisk systems that is quite busy, we are seeing the
following from 'netstat -s':
Udp:
17725210 packets received
36547 packets to unknown port received.
44017 packet receive errors
17101174 packets sent
RcvbufErrors: 44017 --- this
When
On 10 December 2010 16:45, Steve Davies davies...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On one of our asterisk systems that is quite busy, we are seeing the
following from 'netstat -s':
Udp:
17725210 packets received
36547 packets to unknown port received.
44017 packet receive errors
17101174
On 10 December 2010 17:21, Shaun Ruffell sruff...@digium.com wrote:
On 12/10/2010 11:02 AM, Steve Davies wrote:
On 10 December 2010 16:45, Steve Davies davies...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On one of our asterisk systems that is quite busy, we are seeing the
following from 'netstat -s':
Udp:
On 10 December 2010 17:33, Steve Davies davies...@gmail.com wrote:
On 10 December 2010 17:21, Shaun Ruffell sruff...@digium.com wrote:
On 12/10/2010 11:02 AM, Steve Davies wrote:
On 10 December 2010 16:45, Steve Davies davies...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On one of our asterisk systems that is
Upgraded from 16.2.14 to 1.6.2.15 on Fedora 13, with aastra 9133i and 57i.
On 9133i and 57i:
#extension# works for a blind transfer.
XferextensionXfer doesn't!
All this worked on 1.6.2.14.
Nothing useful on cli, verbose 3, DEBUG. Here extension 169 answers an
outside call, and tries to
Just saw this after we did the same upgrade... Take a look at the bug below (we
first saw it in 1.8) - it has a work around that you can use...
https://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=18185
-Jon
- Original Message -
From: sean darcy seandar...@gmail.com
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
On 12/10/2010 12:28 PM, Steve Davies wrote:
On 10 December 2010 17:33, Steve Davies davies...@gmail.com wrote:
On 10 December 2010 17:21, Shaun Ruffell sruff...@digium.com wrote:
On 12/10/2010 11:02 AM, Steve Davies wrote:
On 10 December 2010 16:45, Steve Davies davies...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On 12/10/2010 01:51 PM, Jonathan C. Bailey wrote:
Just saw this after we did the same upgrade... Take a look at the bug below
(we first saw it in 1.8) - it has a work around that you can use...
https://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=18185
-Jon
- Original Message -
From: sean
On 12/10/2010 01:45 PM, sean darcy wrote:
This was supposedly fixed in 1.6.2 on November 22, 2010. So isn't the
fix in 1.6.2.15, released 12/8?
In any event, that bug has been declared fixed, so you can't add a note.
Not necessarily, no. Releases go through a 'release candidate' phase for
a
On 12/10/2010 02:57 PM, Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
On 12/10/2010 01:45 PM, sean darcy wrote:
This was supposedly fixed in 1.6.2 on November 22, 2010. So isn't the
fix in 1.6.2.15, released 12/8?
In any event, that bug has been declared fixed, so you can't add a note.
Not necessarily, no.
On 12/10/2010 03:26 PM, sean darcy wrote:
On 12/10/2010 02:57 PM, Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
On 12/10/2010 01:45 PM, sean darcy wrote:
This was supposedly fixed in 1.6.2 on November 22, 2010. So isn't the
fix in 1.6.2.15, released 12/8?
In any event, that bug has been declared fixed, so you
On 12/10/2010 05:01 PM, Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
On 12/10/2010 03:26 PM, sean darcy wrote:
On 12/10/2010 02:57 PM, Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
On 12/10/2010 01:45 PM, sean darcy wrote:
This was supposedly fixed in 1.6.2 on November 22, 2010. So isn't the
fix in 1.6.2.15, released 12/8?
In any
On 12/10/2010 04:18 PM, sean darcy wrote:
On 12/10/2010 05:01 PM, Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
On 12/10/2010 03:26 PM, sean darcy wrote:
On 12/10/2010 02:57 PM, Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
On 12/10/2010 01:45 PM, sean darcy wrote:
This was supposedly fixed in 1.6.2 on November 22, 2010. So isn't the
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 10:44 AM, Wouter Schoot wou...@schoot.org wrote:
Dear list,
I'm trying to get Asterisk to work dual-stack on Linux and I'm left with
a question.
Imagine that a user (on the road) connects to Asterisk from various
places. Many of them probably don't have IPv6 support
On 12/10/2010 05:49 PM, Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
On 12/10/2010 04:18 PM, sean darcy wrote:
On 12/10/2010 05:01 PM, Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
On 12/10/2010 03:26 PM, sean darcy wrote:
On 12/10/2010 02:57 PM, Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
On 12/10/2010 01:45 PM, sean darcy wrote:
This was supposedly
Hi Tilghman,
Btw w.r.t to the patch delivered for this bug, as I stated in the notes, it
worked for trunk. I tried it for 1.6.2.15 and the patch came up with a few
errors, as in the patch wasn't clean and I just looked at the
configure.ac.rej file and made the changes manually. I wanted to test
21 matches
Mail list logo
