Re: [asterisk-users] Base memory usage

2010-12-31 Thread Gilles
On Thu, 30 Dec 2010 23:53:04 -0500, Jeremy Kister asterisk...@jeremykister.com wrote: I've got just about everything turned on via menuselect, but then i have a bunch of modules turned off via modules.conf Incidently, is there a sure-fire way (eg. checking error messages in Asterisk's log file)

Re: [asterisk-users] Base memory usage

2010-12-31 Thread Larry Wimble
Jeremy Kister wrote: On 12/30/2010 9:59 PM, Larry Wimble wrote: I just installed asterisk 1.8.1.1 along with FreePBX on a fairly small VPS (512mb standard, 512mb burst). I note that the asterisk process is using about 209mb of memory just doing nothing (not configured to do anything yet) I'm

Re: [asterisk-users] Base memory usage

2010-12-31 Thread Danny Nicholas
-Original Message- From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Gilles Sent: Friday, December 31, 2010 3:21 AM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Base memory usage On Thu, 30 Dec 2010 23:53:04

Re: [asterisk-users] Base memory usage

2010-12-31 Thread Danny Nicholas
-Original Message- From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Larry Wimble Sent: Friday, December 31, 2010 8:11 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Base memory usage

Re: [asterisk-users] How to initiate a two-party call from within Asterisk

2010-12-31 Thread Roger Burton West
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 01:36:17PM -0600, Chris Gentle wrote: This is click-to-call. It can be done with the Asterisk Manager Interface (AMI). See this site: Thanks to you and Tilghman for this, though as it turned out it was much simpler to avoid AMI completely and use the Extension:

Re: [asterisk-users] Base memory usage

2010-12-31 Thread Jeremy Kister
On 12/31/2010 9:11 AM, Larry Wimble wrote: Removing modules one by one seemed to have virtually no effect until I got to chan_iax2.so. Removing this module dropped memory consumption from 209mb to 16mb (looking at the RES column in the output of `top'). Apparently, it's a known issue: