Re: [asterisk-users] how asterisk detects silence?

2015-03-23 Thread Matthew Jordan
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 12:25 AM, Dmitry Melekhov d...@belkam.com wrote: 19.03.2015 09:31, Dmitry Melekhov пишет: Hello! As I see there is dsp_drop_silence switch in confbridge. Could you tell me how asterisk detects silence? Is it possible to change silence level, so, let's say some not

Re: [asterisk-users] [OT] switches

2015-03-23 Thread David Stahl
Remember that that zyxel 16 port switch is only 8 poe ports. If your phones are 802.3af or 802.3at, you could look at the ubiquiti line of switches. On Mar 13, 2015 9:34 PM, Brian Franklin bfrank...@ntginc.net wrote: If your phones support PoE, I have had huge success with Zyxel:

[asterisk-users] Local channel + queue

2015-03-23 Thread Marek Cervenka
hi, i'm facing problem with multiple calls to one agent when Local channels are used wireshark shows multiple invites to the agent's phone used versions asterisk 1.8/asterisk 13 agents are logged dynamically. interface state based on hints queue configuration ... ringinuse=no autofill = yes

[asterisk-users] PJSIP - Video Support for WebRTC

2015-03-23 Thread Gosmac
Hey i have an interesting topic to discuss here. The main goal here is to be able to make a video call between two WebRTC endpoints registered on asterisk 13 it is a feature that definitely asterisk 13 should support . the problems that i faced with this is the following and i hope i could get

Re: [asterisk-users] RTP sent to remote internal IP

2015-03-23 Thread Joshua Colp
Harel Cohen wrote: Hello List, I need your advise please. I am trying to establish a call from Asterisk 1.8.15-cert5 to one remote SIP UA (not Asterisk), both are behind NAT. That remote peer is configured with nat=yes in my sip.conf but yet RTP packets are being sent to its internal IP address

[asterisk-users] Question about hangup - Asterisk v11.15.0

2015-03-23 Thread Administrator TOOTAI
Hello, on previous versions of asterisk, extension h and H make us know who ended a call (caller or callee). In the last * versions, seems that only h extension is used, as stated here http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/Asterisk+standard+extensions In the last versions, how do we know which

Re: [asterisk-users] PJSIP - Video Support for WebRTC

2015-03-23 Thread Matthew Jordan
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 8:55 AM, Gosmac gosee...@gmail.com wrote: Hey i have an interesting topic to discuss here. The main goal here is to be able to make a video call between two WebRTC endpoints registered on asterisk 13 it is a feature that definitely asterisk 13 should support . the

Re: [asterisk-users] [OT] switches

2015-03-23 Thread thufir
On Mon, 23 Mar 2015 10:11:54 +, Lukasz Sokol wrote: No, ethernet switch works at lower / physical / MAC layer, NAT is 'above' that; so as long as everything is OK with your TCP/IP settings everywhere, a switch is entirely transparent to TCP/IP (or generally, when it's encapsulated into

[asterisk-users] Auto Answer

2015-03-23 Thread ricky gutierrez
Hi , I'm having some problems with functions enable auto answer in some Grandstream GXP 1405 , I have enabled this feature in the snom 821 phone and work gr8 , in the gandstream not work, I enable the function on the phone Allow Auto Answer by Call-Info: yes Dialplan: exten =

Re: [asterisk-users] [OT] switches

2015-03-23 Thread Lukasz Sokol
On 22/03/15 03:03, thufir wrote: On Fri, 13 Mar 2015 20:33:13 -0500, Brian Franklin wrote: If your phones support PoE, I have had huge success with Zyxel: http://www.amazon.com/ZyXEL-ES1100-16P-16-Port-Ethernet-Unmanaged/dp/B00

Re: [asterisk-users] [OT] switches

2015-03-23 Thread Kevin Larsen
so how does a client pc find the server if there's no NAT? by IP address?? That makes no sense, to me, if the switch isn't assigning addresses. Switches have a MAC table that keeps track of which MAC addresses are on which ports. That's how they decide where to route packets.

Re: [asterisk-users] [OT] switches

2015-03-23 Thread Steve Edwards
On Mon, 23 Mar 2015, thufir wrote: so how does a client pc find the server if there's no NAT? by IP address?? That makes no sense, to me, if the switch isn't assigning addresses. The 'endpoint' (pc, softphone, mobile, desk set, etc.) 'finds' the server's IP address when: ) You configure

Re: [asterisk-users] [OT] switches

2015-03-23 Thread Lukasz Sokol
On 23/03/15 16:37, thufir wrote: On Mon, 23 Mar 2015 10:11:54 +, Lukasz Sokol wrote: No, ethernet switch works at lower / physical / MAC layer, NAT is 'above' that; so as long as everything is OK with your TCP/IP settings everywhere, a switch is entirely transparent to TCP/IP (or

[asterisk-users] trying to connect to asterisk with softphone (logs, etc)

2015-03-23 Thread thufir
In the Asterisk log I see: --- [Mar 23 19:25:29] VERBOSE[4067] chan_sip.c: [Mar 23 19:25:29] --- SIP read from UDP:198.38.7.34:5065 --- SIP/2.0 200 OK To: sip:16046289...@sip.babytel.ca;tag=sd3D4swKRc From: sip:16046289...@sip.babytel.ca;tag=as07c833c5 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP