On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 08:28:42 -,
Michael J. Tubby G8TIC [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All,
I have upgraded by home machine from Fedora Core 5 (FC5) to the recent FC6
and am struggling to build Zaptel-1.2.10 and Asterisk-1.2.13 on the box...
which is an Intep P4 2.8GHz HT processor box
On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 11:56:26 +0200,
Tomislav Parčina [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The thing is that I can't rely on yum update for asterisk installation. I
would like something that will work like this: I install FC5 from CD/DVD,
install RPM's that I need from my ftp server or from CD,
On Sun, Jul 02, 2006 at 00:31:36 -0400,
M.Hockings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yup that looks like it is in our future now. I had thought it was a
misconfiguration of the UPS software on the new machine but apparently
not. The battery has died in the UPS. With two machines and displays
On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 14:10:06 -0400,
M.Hockings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One weakness is the incoming PSTN line, what is the best way to protect
that beyond the device at the premises entry ?
It is common for UPS's to provide surge protection for a phone line. That would
probably be a
On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 10:38:14 -0600,
Jon Scottorn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
I have been struggling with the auto dial out in asterisk. I am
trying to get a call to be auto dialed and play back a message once the
line is answered. So far I have been unsuccessful.
I have an analog modem and a TDM31B and one outside line.
I want to use the modem to dial out on demand for a PPP network connection
and also use the outside line with the TDM31B. I am willing to have the
modem work at 28.8Kbps. I want a lock of some sort so that voice calls do
not break in on
On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 14:57:48 -0400,
Carlton O'Riley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's actually AES 256-bit. That's pretty good encryption as far as I'm
concerned (comercially speaking).
That doesn't mean the whole system is secure.
___
On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 00:16:17 -0500,
Brian Capouch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jean-Michel Hiver wrote:
Jean-Michel Hiver wrote:
Oops, sorry for the list reply :/
Actually, why does the Reply-To point to the Asterisk Users mailing
list? This breaks the reply to sender only / reply to
On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 11:04:48 -0500,
Bruno Wolff III [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My perception of this list is that it is not run like a technical list.
Besides the reply-to issue, there are a lot of people starting new threads
by following up to existing threads, useless subject headers
On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 13:29:51 -0500,
Josiah Bryan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, RFCs may say different, but are they really logical to the common man?
Or even to technical users who dont care about the RFCs and just want to do
their work?
On most technical lists people know the
On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 13:00:57 -0600,
Bruno Wolff III [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What I am wondering is if I could use the TDM431B to divide our phone lines
into 3 groups to use as an intercom, but still have them work normally
for answering calls and calling outside.
It looks like I do
I am looking at buying either a TDM411B or TDM431B to play around with
Asterisk at home.
What I am wondering is if I could use the TDM431B to divide our phone lines
into 3 groups to use as an intercom, but still have them work normally
for answering calls and calling outside.
I found commands
12 matches
Mail list logo
