andrutto wrote:
I was wondering why asterisk - great telecommunication program - has such a
weak fax support.
Because it's a PBX and not a fax server.
Use IAXmodem and HylaFAX, and then you have a fax server.
http://sourceforge.net/projects/iaxmodem
http://hylafax.sourceforge.net/
Lee.
Bruno Voigt wrote:
Hi,
I'm running asterisk 1.2.1 and started to play with iaxmodem 0.0.7
running on the same box.
I wonder how to setup the iax account correctly so that I may
initiate outbound calls via iaxmodem?
registration upon iaxmodem startup is okay and I can direct calls to it.
Andrew Nowrot wrote:
Few days ago I installed Email2fax application on my Asterisk box. I
works but not in 100 %. Sometimes (to be certain quite often) I don't
receive the whole fax. My fax machine cuts off transmission in 1/2 or
1/3 of the page. I read about it on a wiki and some user lists
Andrew Nowrot wrote:
Email with attached .pdf file --- Asterisk 1.2 box with qmail,
connected to PSTN by ISDN HFC-S card, with a_law codec--- PSTN
(ISDN)--- Another Asterisk with the same card and codec --- fax
machine connected to Asterisk by Digium card.
So...
Asterisk - alaw ISDN
Miguel Soto wrote:
Hi:
I am testing IAXmodem+HylaFAX setup on asterisk. I have two * boxes.
They can send faxes to each other, it works perfect. But if I register
The two boxes into a provider I can't send a fax to each other
(my temporal provider is goiax.com).
IAXmodem seems to transmit
: 0ms SCall: 3 DCall: 28158 [127.0.0.1:4569]
Remote hangup.
-Original Message-
From: Lee Howard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2005 12:12
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] iaxmodem
Miguel Soto wrote
Miguel Soto wrote:
Is the right behavior of the IAXmodem to display
Registration completed successfully and remote hangup many times?
You'd have to show me an example for me to say for certain, but my guess
is that if it looks wrong to you then it probably is wrong. This output
should
Matt Riddell wrote:
Colin Anderson wrote:
Steve Underwood also informed me about chan_fax
(http://www.sofaswitch.org/chan_fax/), I'll have a look.
This looks awesome please report back to the list on this if you get it
working correctly.
What's the idea of this? How does it
Lee Archer wrote:
Nov 24 10:50:15.02: [ 8222]: -- data [1031]
Nov 24 10:51:15.01: [ 8222]: MODEM TIMEOUT: writing to modem
Nov 24 10:51:15.01: [ 8222]: MODEM WRITE SHORT: sent 1031, wrote 984
Nov 24 10:51:15.01: [ 8222]: SEND end page
What's going on with the iaxmodem output (on
Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:
Faxes are designed to work around the noise and other signal problems inherent
in analog telephony. VOIP introduces an entirely different set of noise
factors that fax machines are frankly ill-equipped to deal with. Jitter and
dropped packets are the biggest of these
Miguel Soto wrote:
I am trying to configure the IAXmodem/ Hylafax server. I have a
question related, where do you define the extension for the fax? In
the extensions.conf or iax.conf file?
You define the extension in extensions.conf, but you also have to grant
access permissions in
James Armstrong wrote:
I was wondering if anyone would know why receiving a fax via an
extension - IAXModem - Hylafax would work, but fax - rxfax
(spandsp) does not. When I try to use the app_rxfax the fax machine
reports a comm error. If I use the IAXModem client connected to
Hylafax it
James Armstrong wrote:
Thanks, that helps. What variable (in Asterisk) would I modify if I
wanted to tweak one of the CALLERID fields that gets passed? Right
now, it is not passing the DID number the fax came in on, it is always
passing 's' as the NDID.
I think the key is to just not
Rob McKrill wrote:
I am just getting started in the Hylafax stuff and have a dual PRI
card I am trying to do this with, but I am going to give IAXmodem a
shot as soon as I get the tif to pdf conversion working.
HylaFAX should already have the TIFF - PDF conversion stuff built-in.
Rob McKrill wrote:
The TIFF - PDF conversion is working fine, just the
mime-encoding/attachment stuff to the email seems to be where i am
having issues. I am able to use the existing conversion stuff from
the command-line. I have metamail, uuencode, and base64-encode
installed, but must be
James Armstrong wrote:
The only problem here is, we are using our normal did numbers that
forward to our extensions. Asterisk detects the fax tone and sends it
to the exten = fax,1, extension.
In this example faxdetect is overwriting the DID.
So the trick then would be to somewhere
Lee Archer wrote:
Hi, I wonder if you can give me some pointers please. I have hylafax
running, I've tested it with a modem off the serial port so I know the
install does work, and I've installed IAXmodem to be able to fax out
via asterisk. I've set everything up as in the README that comes
Lee Archer wrote:
disallow=all
allow=ulaw
allow=alaw
allow=gsm
IAXmodem uses slinear.
allow=slinear
Lee.
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com --
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
Anton Krall wrote:
What does iaxmodem do?
It provides a soft-modem over an IAX channel.
Lee.
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com --
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
See:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/iaxmodem/
Lee.
Anton Krall wrote:
Nice! For Windows I suppose.. Have you tested it with good results?
|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
|Lee Howard
|Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2005 1
Anton Krall wrote:
I just read the webpage..
I thought it was something that you could install on Windows to make a
virtual printer or something that could send faxes to asterisk and out.
Anybody know of such a solution? I read something a while ago but Im more
interested in somebody
Anton Krall wrote:
Sounds like a good setup. Will this replace spandsp or how does this setup
integrate with that?
IAXmodem uses spandsp (the library) but does not use txfax/rxfax.
I suppose it works on sending and receveing right?
Yes.
Lee.
Jonathan k. Creasy wrote:
I am using the libiax2 that I just got out of CVS with cvs checkout
libiax2
As the README states (clearly) you must use the libiax2 and the spandsp
that come with IAXmodem.
Lee.
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored
Then open a tracker case at the iaxmodem site with the build error, and
we'll see what we can do.
Lee.
Rusty Dekema wrote:
I can't build the libiax2 that comes with it on my FreeBSD system :(.
Unfortunately FreeBSD is not a supported platform.
-Rusty
On 11/16/05, *Lee Howard* [EMAIL
Colin Anderson wrote:
This is the failing of the open-source business model
I disagree.
The open-source business model fails when the business revenue is
focused upon monetary sales of the (otherwise free) software. The
success in open-source business models comes when the business
BJ Weschke wrote:
ABE exists for corporations that say How can we consider
implementing open sourced software that has no commercial support and
isn't thoroughly tested?. The demand was there for corporations that
wanted a commercial package before they went ahead with
implementation.. They
Kerry Garrison wrote:
Got a client building a system that needs to send out hundreds of
faxes per day (not, not junk faxes). We have just implemented an
asterisk server for the client for their office and they asked if
there was an outbound fax solution that would utilize VOIP providers
I'll see what I can do about improving the error messages involved with
the write error, but that's not going to help your problem here.
Until the IAXmodem documentation says otherwise, you *must* install and
use the spandsp version that ships with IAXmodem. The only exception to
this of
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
now the problem is spandsp, If I call from a fax machine it rings 5-6 times
and then it goes away (remote hungap)
What your HylaFAX modem config file saying for RingsBeforeAnswer?
Lee.
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The comment below makes me wonder could ttyIAX be configured to answer
mgetty?
Although I've not tried mgetty with IAXmodem, the intent was to make
this possible (for faxing), yes.
I have made the mgetty talk to ttyIAX however, as soon as a ring comes
into th
Craig Guy wrote:
I'm trying to figure out what an appropriate deployment model might
be. Whether to have iaxmodem installed on the hylafax server with a
switched ethernet connection for iax2 to the * server with the PRI, or
to have the iaxmodem on the PRI * server and channel the tty comms
Tom Rymes wrote:
(I would like to be able to receive faxes reliably
over our PRI)
Until then, however, I still recommend HylaFAX.
If your PRI comes in to a TE405P or somesuch then you can pass fax DIDs
out through another port on the TE405P and out to a T1 faxmodem (such as
a Patton
trixter http://www.0xdecafbad.com wrote:
There is very little info on the sf.net page regarding its
capabilities ...
Right now that's intentional. I still consider it developer-grade
code. That said, I do use it on small production usage, and it's fine
there with a few known issues
Tom Rymes wrote:
On Oct 12, 2005, at 11:26 AM, Lee Howard wrote:
Tom Rymes wrote:
(I would like to be able to receive faxes reliably
over our PRI)
Until then, however, I still recommend HylaFAX.
If your PRI comes in to a TE405P or somesuch then you can pass fax
DIDs out through
trixter http://www.0xdecafbad.com wrote:
Cant iaxmodem work by having asterisk bridge the pri channel as needed
(did based routing perhaps) and then have hylafax use iaxmodem as the
modem it uses. That should result in no additional hardware, which
means testing can happen with little cost to
trixter http://www.0xdecafbad.com wrote:
Perhaps Lee can comment on exactly how 'development grade' it really is,
perhaps even cite some test cases where people have used it on larger
scale operations (ie larger than a home users 1-2 times a month or
less).
According to sourceforge, there
Darren Nickerson wrote:
We prefer the Eicon Diva server and Brooktrout TR1034 boards, which
are known to work well with HylaFAX since we've had our share of
headaches with the 2977's.
Well, part of my preference for the 2977s involves my strong dislike for
the way that the Diva Servers and
Darren Nickerson wrote:
I'm curious though, in an earlier message you wrote:
Sending is also quite good, however, there are some quirks with the
Patton
firmware which need to be resolved for me to be completely delighted.
Are these issues you refer to just cosmetic 'nice to haves' or do
Tom Rymes wrote:
Frankly, I would recommend that you forget about trying to fax with
Asterisk. Buy a good Multitech analog modem and install HylaFAX.
Use the right tool for the job!!!
Actually, you can use HylaFAX and Asterisk together.
https://sourceforge.net/projects/iaxmodem/
Just
Bob Goddard wrote:
On Tuesday 11 Oct 2005 22:41, Lee Howard wrote:
Tom Rymes wrote:
Use the right tool for the job!!!
Use a hardware based DSP for faxing not software based.
Why is a soft-DSP to be considered any less-capable than hardware ones?
The reason why I put
Roger Schreiter wrote:
I think, you agree, that VoIP is somewhat similar to ISDN, as it
transports analog audio data in a digitally coded way.
Noone doubts, that ISDN is suitable to transport analog fax.
Finally the PSTN is 99,9% digital (ISDN/SS7), even if some
subscriber lines are still
Roger Schreiter wrote:
We are currently testing a commercial fax library with the goal,
to implement an IAX client as fax server, in order the send or
receive some dozen faxes simultaniously. It is too early to
say, if we'll succeed, but we hope so, and thus won't forget
faxing through
Roger Schreiter wrote:
Do you think, one can connect a hylafax server to
iaxmodem?
Yes, that's my purpose behind IAXmodem.
Well, we will proceed the project anyway, to
see, whether it is possible or not.
I think that IAXmodem could show you that it is possible without having
to go
Johan van Tongeren wrote:
On my * the faxes in- and outbound are of poor quality. I’m missing
some lines.
TxFAX and RxFAX don't yet support ECM, and so you're going to miss an
occassional line. The frequency will depend upon the quality of the
connection between the two endpoints.
Lee.
Terry Wilson wrote:
Is anyone still working on implementing t.38 support for asterisk?
Looking at http://www.voip-info.org/tiki-index.php?page=Asterisk+T.38+Bounty,
I'm assuming that it isn't a matter of money being a motivation...
T.38 isn't a trivial enhancement, and I think that the
Brian West wrote:
Just an FYI http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=2005080914234645
Although Groklaw seems to think that these suits are about faxing, I
don't think that they really are. See:
http://www.hylafax.org/archive/2005-08/msg00107.html
Lee.
Brian West wrote:
No it is really about faxing. As someone that has first hand
knowledge of the case outlined on Groklaw, it is in fact about faxing.
Go read the two patents very carefully! If you email it you break
638, if you store it you break 021.
How, then, do these patents
Steve Underwood wrote:
That message isn't really well thought out,
Sorry, I'll do better next time. :-)
Lee.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or
Aidan Van Dyk wrote:
Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
The first two statements are true; the third is not.
While you can certainly distribute the code you contribute to us via any
other means you wish (under any other license you wish, including the
GPL), the Digium Asterisk source tree cannot
Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:
On Friday 22 July 2005 12:04, Lee Howard wrote:
Well, I'm sure that was an added bonus. :-) Free work and free money.
It reminds me of a certain Dire Straits lyric.
Yes but are the chicks free?
Were there many chicks at Astricon?
Lee
Jay Milk wrote:
Who is getting the better end of the deal?
Well, Digium, of course. I certainly hope that they've made way more
money from Asterisk than I ever expect to save or make. And I certainly
expect that Digium has made way more money from Asterisk because they've
open-sourced
Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
You seem to be neglecting the amount of work that Digium puts into the
Asterisk (and related) products on an ongoing basis that is given to
the community at no charge.
So at least we agree, then, on what the reasoning is. Digium feels that
the community owes it to
Any consultant, business, or person that intends to reliably sustain
support and maintainance contracts of software for commercial purposes
must have some acceptable level of control over that software. It used
to be that Digium controlled all of the commits to the CVS repository.
I don't
Paul van Brouwershaven wrote:
HylaFAX can (we ar doing this now), but not with E1 or T1. So you can
only send with a maximum 2 channels. (with two default analog modems)
HylaFAX can use E1 and T1 fax modems just fine (24 and 30 channels each).
Furthermore, HylaFAX also supports multiport
Jian Hong GUAN wrote:
Can you tell me how to configure Hylafax + Asterisk in order to be
able to receive/send faxes.
If you have an incoming T1/E1 line:
telco -- T1/E1 -- TE405P/TE410P -- Asterisk -- TE405P/TE410P
(another port) -- T1/E1 fax modem -- HylaFAX
or:
telco -- T1/E1 --
Deon wrote:
My boss is insisting we support fax, and I keep telling him that Fax over
IP is very unreliable and not recommended and his immediate come-back is
Vonage does it. and it's very hard to figure out how.
I don't think Vonage does T.38, the Linksys/Sipura units they're using
doesn't
George Pajari wrote:
What's a poor user who wants to use Asterisk as a PRI PBX to do? Get a
channel bank to support one fax? I don't think so. It's hard to sell
Asterisk/Digium as a serious alternative to Nortel with these
embarrassments.
Yeah, well, right now the only options are to do
Marco Parmeggiani wrote:
Can someone explain me what's going on and why the receiver of this
fax guives up saying communication error?
Start tx page 1
EOP: 2f
RTN: 4c
DCN: fb
Disconnecting
The receiver says communication error because txfax's response to the
receiver's RTN signal was a
Steve Underwood wrote:
TxFAX is doing the right thing, according to the spec. If you don't
know how to handle RTN you should disconect. spandsp has not yet been
taught how to retrain and retransmit properly.
Okay, so it's not an error. It's an unimplemented feature. :-)
However, this is
Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:
On Saturday 11 June 2005 19:51, Lee Howard wrote:
I don't think that lack of mindshare completely defines the reasons
behind Asterisk fork failures. It places all of the blame on the
forkers. I think the truth, though, is that they not only fail due to
lack
Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:
On Saturday 11 June 2005 16:10, trixter http://www.0xdecafbad.com wrote:
Personally I dont see a problem with any of this. If digium makes it
too difficult to do stuff asterisk *can* be forked unless that is
forbidden (because its GPL I didnt bother to look at
On Tue, 17 May 2005, Jean-Yves Avenard wrote:
Side questions about spandsp... Is it possible to print the fax
header like what most faxes do (that is: who is sending the fax, how
many pages are included etc...) I'm not talking about printing
callerid, often I receive fax from the US
Nenad Radosavljevic wrote:
OK I see the ponit (although I never said that second page is
interrupted - I said that in some combinations of resolutions and TIFF
options receiving fax spits another blank sheet of paper beside the
clearly received first page).
Oh. Well, then that's another
Steve Underwood wrote:
Jean-Yves Avenard wrote:
Is there any future support for fax in colours? just wondering, I
don't think I've ever used it before anyway :)
Priorities:
1. T.38
2. A more complete T.30
3. ECM (which is really a part of 2)
4. Things like colour FAX (which in part
Nenad Radosavljevic wrote:
Hi everyone !
I have some aditional info on problem with TXFax and sending
multi-page TIFFs.
I have made 6 different multi-page TIFFs (Group3 1D with fillbits EOL
aligned - 3 pages one TIFF in lowres and one in hires, Group3 2D -3
pages againg in both resolutions ,
On Sun, 15 May 2005, Steve Underwood wrote:
Lee Howard wrote:
The other option to color faxing is JBIG compression. The problem
there, is that JBIG is fairly heavily patented still. Thus many fax
machines just aren't supporting it yet.
Thanks Lee. I found that helpful, except
Nenad,
You said that the second page was terminating at some point after the
start of the fax image. There is no handshaking going on after page
image data starts.
Because txfax does not currently support ECM the only reason why a page of
image data would terminate prematurely is because the
On Sun, 15 May 2005, Lee Howard wrote:
Because txfax does not currently support ECM the only reason why a page of
image data would terminate prematurely is because the receiver detected a
carrier drop when there wasn't one.
I'm sorry, this is a bit to broad of a statement. I suppose
Asking someone to spend eleven times more money on a hardware purchase
($220 vs $20) as a gesture of good will is expecting a bit much, I'd say.
Certainly I can understand that Digium doesn't stand to make much money
selling X100Ps at $10 each, and I can certainly understand them choosing
to
On Tue, 5 Apr 2005, Gavin Hamill wrote:
Has anyone done work on this topic?
I guess it depends what you mean by integration.
We have an 8-line fax system using a Diva
Server card that I'd like to get working using one of the kapejod's QuadBRI
adapters :)
I successfully run a HylaFAX
Hello Steve.
It's an excellent read.
In two places you mention that V.34-Fax is 28,800 bps. Actually,
V.34-Fax has speeds ranging from 2400 baud to 33600 baud all using
V.34. And, while most V.34 connections are going to not probably be
more than 28,800 bps, I have seen sustained analog V.34
On 2005.02.27 04:26 Rich Adamson wrote:
Back in the olden days, I recall several modem vendors bundling PC fax
software with their products. All of those old Win v3.1 apps created
a fax file (eg, pdf or otherwise) that could be distributed via email.
Well, I don't remember any of them doing PDFs.
On 2005.02.27 08:34 Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
Hi,
I read it and found it very enlightening. I do have one question
regarding Modems don't like relativity. It says modems need a
constant delay; is there a limit to what it can handle. For example,
would it be possible to configure a jitterbuffer
On 2005.02.27 09:30 Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
On Sun, Feb 27, 2005 at 09:10:48AM -0800, Lee Howard wrote:
Fax cannot handle a one-second delay. As Steve mentions in the
article, per-spec fax has some timings (particularly silence in
direction switching) set at 75 ms +/- 20 ms. So
On 2005.02.27 10:36 Rich Adamson wrote:
Is it at all
realistic to assume that HylaFax could coexist with Asterisk on one
box?
Yes, you could have both Asterisk and HylaFAX running on the same box.
HylaFAX does not require a lot of resources (CPU, RAM, HDD) for small
deployments. I've had
On 2005.02.27 11:28 Jon Gabrielson wrote:
You wouldn't happen to know how to do this would you?
I currently have a box with both hylafax and asterisk installed.
asterisk handles the dedicated voice lines over a t100p and
hylafax handles the dedicated fax lines over a 4port serial card
with
On 2005.02.27 22:20 Jon Gabrielson wrote:
I have some extra FXS ports on my channel bank that I could
plug the modems into, but is asterisk's fax support good
enough for a production system? Everything I seem to read
seems to state that asterisk fax detection and fax send/receive
support is still
On 2005.02.25 05:53 Rich Adamson wrote:
Steve Underwood,
Would you mind summarizing where/how T.38 functions, and maybe how it
compares to the analog fax environment for the asterisk-users arhives?
I don't mean to speak for Steve, so I hope that Steve will still reply
if he chooses to, but I like
On 2005.02.16 18:57 Darren Nickerson wrote:
Granted the Patton 2997 is limited to 14,400 maximum
This is off-topic for this thread, but the Patton 2977 does support
V.34-Fax (speeds 2400 through 33600 baud), at least in recent firmware
revisions. However, you are correct in that the card
On 2005.02.16 09:00 Brian M. Arlinghaus wrote:
My problem is that the 23 channels are going into asterisk. It seems
that there is no way to pick off a couple of them and use them for
faxes. Basically, I have 23 phone lines and can't use them for faxing.
You could always run another T100P into a
On 2005.02.16 11:20 Brian M. Arlinghaus wrote:
You could always run another T100P into a HylaFAX-run T1 fax modem.
That way you can use your T1 for faxing.
Could you explain a litter further? Thanks.
Well, you can do something like this:
T1 -- TE405P(1) -- Asterisk -- TE405P(2) -- Patton 2977
On 2005.01.19 01:39 tim panton wrote:
My options include;
1) get a basic fax machine and plug it into a (iaxy/sipura?)
ATA. Configure the ATA to do alaw
so asterisk doesn't have to do any transcoding and hope it works.
2) use spandsp on my asterisk system and add suitable print
queues
3) get
On 2005.01.19 17:06 Jon Radon wrote:
I use a Multi-Tech Multimodem ZPX and a Sipura SPA-2000 along with
Hylafax. On the Asterisk end I'm using X100P's. This has worked
flawlessly for me thus far. Some tips of my success.
1.) Fax detect on the Sipura breaks faxing. Strange, I know.
2.) Tuning
On 2005.01.18 08:02 Nir Simionovich wrote:
Well,
Nothing much, so I upped the logger.conf to include debug in
messages log,
in addition, here is the tiffinfo of the file I want to fax:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# tiffinfo /tmp/image.tiff
TIFF Directory at offset 0x433a
Subfile Type: (0 = 0x0)
On 2005.01.18 09:03 Jean-Denis Girard wrote:
Andrew Kohlsmith a écrit :
I can now send faxes just fine, but I cannot for the life of me get
reliable fax reception, nor can I get the stamp machine to work
well. I took out the T100P so there was only one TDM card in the
machine (in case there
On 2005.01.18 08:36 Walt Reed wrote:
I'm thinking of hooking up the faxmodem to the line directly, then
hooking the X100P to the modem's Phone port.
From what I've been able to determine, Asterisk would be most unhappy
if you did that. On X100Ps that phone jack/port needs to simply be
ignored.
On 2005.01.18 10:32 Walt Reed wrote:
Yep - I read about all those problems. I have heard very few sucess
stories of running fax through * at all, which is why I was trying to
find a way to avoid it.
If I can get * to do the fax detection only and then kick off the
external process that should be
On 2005.01.07 08:13 Ryan wrote:
H. Did I just ask in the wrong forum, or has _nobody_ experienced
image
corruption using app_rxfax that was NOT due to using the wrong version
of
libtiff?
Oh, you can get image corruption on any non-ECM fax, and that doesn't
have anything to do with anything
On 2005.01.07 09:42 Jeff wrote:
It is my speculation that the 'cutoff' problem was related to some
type of
'line noise' and that others successfully using the spandsp code
_might_ be
using T1/E1 rather than analog lines (1FL) but when I started testing
using
an old Fax machine plugged into a
On 2004.12.19 16:12 Steven Critchfield wrote:
I also despise those who wish to compete with Digium with exactly the
same hardware Digium sells
Well, not only is it legally within the bounds of the GPL licensing on
the Zapata hardware, but I honestly expect that this kind of
competition is what
On 2004.12.19 10:17 Eric Wieling aka ManxPower wrote:
Personally I don't really approve of a company just taking Digium's
design and cloning it.
Huh? To what hardware are you referring? Certainly you wouldn't be
indicating that the GPL only permits one licensee.
On 2004.12.17 05:42 Sergio Serrano wrote:
Hi all,
again I try configure Hylafax with asterisk. I would like
configure
Asterisk in the next way:
1)An incoming fax go into through X100P
2)Asterisk detects Fax and redirect fax to Hylafax
Is it possible?
Yes, but it may not be
On 2004.12.09 17:56 Joseph wrote:
At time to time I receive some junk faxes from some advertising
companies that play smart and don't provide any TSI number so I can
not
bock them by the number in Hylafax.
Do they not provide Caller*ID either?
Despite calling their Fax Removal Service 1-800-...
On 2004.12.09 18:19 Joseph wrote:
I think it is illegal to send faxes with-out any identifier like
caller ID.
I think the historic US regulations (FCC code) have required all fax
sending devices to include an identification line (header or
tagline) within the first inch or so at the top of the
On 2004.12.07 10:06 Matthew Boehm wrote:
Here is the setup:
POTS - PRI - Asterisk - ATA (Fax)
The ATA is set to only 711. Asterisk's sip.conf sets this device to
only
711. Yet, faxing works less than 50% of the time.
I have a couple of different fax arrangements with Asterisk.
POTS - Asterisk
On 2004.12.04 18:24 Jason Lixfeld wrote:
I've read about Fax to Email, but is there such a beast as email to
fax? If not, what do people use to take care of outbound faxing?
Email-to-fax is popular for some types of businesses. See the HylaFAX
project (http://www.hylafax.org) for some good
On 2004.11.19 07:47 Eric Hall wrote:
My question is will a Wildcard T100P work in a Hylafax server?
This question would be best fielded on the [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailing list, but the simple answer to your question is, no.
The real answer to your question, though is this:
PRI - T100P -
On 2004.11.11 14:31 Adam Goryachev wrote:
Did they contribute to the codebase, or did they just write/release a
patch without contributing to the asterisk codebase? ie, have they
submitted the patch to the bug tracker *AND* signed the disclaimer.
In most other open-source projects there is no
On 2004.10.21 14:49 usedcanon wrote:
Hi All,
Is it possible to detect an incomming fax just as it is possible with
Answer
on a Zap channel. If not do others find the possibility of this
enhancement
useful too?
Doing fax over SIP or IAX would be a frustrating effort, and a complete
waste of time,
On 2004.10.15 12:44 Michael Welter wrote:
Does anyone have experience with a Fax Modem that accepts the
DID/DNIS number?
MultiTech MT5634ZBA-DID supports analog DID.
Eicon Diva Server supports digital lines w/DID.
Patton DataFire supports digital lines w/DID.
Does HylaFAX support this modem?
201 - 300 of 318 matches
Mail list logo
