Re: [asterisk-users] Question on resources

2022-08-04 Thread dk
Doesn’t that mean, effectively that you are using the equivalent of 100% of 2.7 CPUs? --Don From: asterisk-users On Behalf Of Jerry Geis Sent: Thursday, August 4, 2022 7:33 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: [asterisk-users] Question on

[asterisk-users] Just a test

2021-12-14 Thread dk
Just a test --Don -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- Check out the new Asterisk community forum at: https://community.asterisk.org/ New to Asterisk? Start here:

Re: [asterisk-users] Between a dumb client and a capable server...

2021-08-18 Thread dk
Sorry about the top-posting...but that's what my app does! I think it's doable, but would take me six months to work it out! Let's see who jumps in. --Don -Original Message- From: asterisk-users On Behalf Of Antony Stone Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2021 10:07 AM To: Asterisk Users'

Re: [asterisk-users] Between a dumb client and a capable server...

2021-08-18 Thread dk
I think I would start by finding an open source SIP client that can manage calls like you want, then figure out how to divide the control and audio responsibilities between these two SIP clients. Curious about why you can't just use the more capable SIP client. --Don -Original

Re: [asterisk-users] STIR/SHAKEN

2021-03-11 Thread dk
You said it in your first post when you said “I reallt don’t understand.” You don’t understand the business that these people are in. A few people showed you a few examples of why it’s important to use more than one carrier--and there are other reasons that stir/shaken is a big deal for some of

Re: [asterisk-users] Stir Shaken

2020-07-14 Thread dk
From: asterisk-users On Behalf Of Saint Michael Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2020 2:35 PM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: [asterisk-users] Stir Shaken I need to point out the this is factually misleading and materially false: "I think this, being the basis of your whole

Re: [asterisk-users] Stir Shaken

2020-07-13 Thread dk
-Original Message- From: asterisk-users On Behalf Of Matthew Fredrickson Sent: Monday, July 13, 2020 2:44 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Stir Shaken On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 2:34 PM Saint Michael wrote: >> >> There is a

Re: [asterisk-users] weather.agi

2015-12-16 Thread dk
-Original Message- From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Jeff LaCoursiere Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2015 11:11 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: [asterisk-users] weather.agi

Re: [asterisk-users] PTT push to talk solution

2015-08-07 Thread dk
If I had this request from a customer, I'd give them a box that sits on the conference table with a big red light that lights when the ptt switch is on. Would work with a regular Plantronics, etc., headset. Check with these folks to make it work: www.sandman.com --Don From:

Re: [asterisk-users] showing sip number insted of pri number

2015-07-31 Thread dk
It is possible. Are your SIP numbers from the same carrier as your PRI trunks? Some carriers will not let you present a calling number that's not on your account (to prevent spoofing). --Don -Original Message- From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com

Re: [asterisk-users] Forward loop protection...

2015-06-03 Thread dk
-Original Message- From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of A J Stiles Sent: Wednesday, June 3, 2015 3:08 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Forward loop

Re: [asterisk-users] Forward loop protection...

2015-06-02 Thread dk
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Kevin Larsen Sent: Tuesday, June 2, 2015 4:09 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Forward loop protection... Ia had a

Re: [asterisk-users] Forward loop protection...

2015-06-02 Thread dk
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Kevin Larsen Sent: Tuesday, June 2, 2015 5:12 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Forward loop protection... The loop

Re: [asterisk-users] PRI Callerid Passthrough

2015-03-18 Thread dk
This depends on what you mean by “not involving the service provider.” If you are literally forwarding calls that come in on the PRI back out on the PRI, the most efficient way is with Two B-Channel Transfer (TBCT). Check it out in the wiki. You need to make sure your carrier supports

Re: [asterisk-users] PRI Callerid Passthrough

2015-03-18 Thread dk
The way it's expected to work: Inbound call to our toll-free number, we pay for the call TO US until terminated Inbound call to our local number, caller pays for the call TO US until terminated (if long distance charges apply for caller) In either case, we pay for the outbound call if

Re: [asterisk-users] Investigating international calls fraud

2015-01-29 Thread dk
It's very unlikely that this was an employee calling Mom for 66 hours (I'm assuming these calls appeared on a single bill). It's also unlikely that someone inside would benefit financially from making these calls. (Follow the money!) Don't discount the possibility that you've overlooked something