RE: [Asterisk-Users] Re: Web interface

2006-02-03 Thread Steve Totaro
] Re: Web interface Yes DRUID is a much better interface than AMP, and I would never buy it because its not that good. Destar is something I have also discovered recently and even though its still in early development it has the best design and its plug in architecture makes it potentially

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: Web interface

2006-02-03 Thread Sean Cook
Message- From: Shidan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2006 11:41 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: Web interface Yes DRUID is a much better interface than AMP, and I would never buy it because its not that good

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: Web interface

2006-02-03 Thread Kevin P. Fleming
Steve Totaro wrote: Another question, If Signate is not using ABE, what are their requirements for releasing source as far as the GUI? The Asterisk GPL has no bearing on the external tools used to manage/configure it, unless those tools require changes in Asterisk itself or loadable modules

[Asterisk-Users] Re: Web interface

2006-01-31 Thread Vikram Rangnekar
+++ Strain Jer [30/01/06 01:29 +]: I was searching thru the internet and I found a wide variety of different web interfaces for asterisks I was curious which one is best suited for asterisks. Thanks ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: Web interface

2006-01-31 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 11:24:54AM +0100, Vikram Rangnekar wrote: +++ Strain Jer [30/01/06 01:29 +]: I was searching thru the internet and I found a wide variety of different web interfaces for asterisks I was curious which one is best suited for asterisks. Thanks Check out

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: Web interface

2006-01-31 Thread Dovid Bender
Generaly you get what you pay for (with very few exceptions such as asterisk). Also as far as a web interface goes its really one that you get used to and like. There are lots out there. You goto find one that works for you. --- Tzafrir Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: Web interface

2006-01-31 Thread Dustin Wildes
Tzafrir Cohen wrote: On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 11:24:54AM +0100, Vikram Rangnekar wrote: +++ Strain Jer [30/01/06 01:29 +]: I was searching thru the internet and I found a wide variety of different web interfaces for asterisks I was curious which one is best

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Re: Web interface

2006-01-31 Thread Steve Totaro
] Re: Web interface Tzafrir Cohen wrote: On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 11:24:54AM +0100, Vikram Rangnekar wrote: +++ Strain Jer [30/01/06 01:29 +]: I

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: Web interface

2006-01-31 Thread Dustin Wildes
Steve Totaro wrote: I don't see how any of these are better than AMP or [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] . What features do any of these have that [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] doesn't? The only problem with [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] is the name.

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: Web interface

2006-01-31 Thread Shidan
Yes DRUID is a much better interface than AMP, and I would never buy it because its not that good. Destar is something I have also discovered recently and even though its still in early development it has the best design and its plug in architecture makes it potentially quite powerful. it's very